Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:51:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed  (Read 1922 times)
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« on: July 15, 2005, 12:55:50 AM »

I've also heard that her cover was pretty much blown once she started to date her current husband. But it doesn't really matter this story is a non-issue/JFern conspiracy nonsense.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2005, 01:05:12 AM »

Scary to think the American people are ignorant enough to put up with the media and the Dems insisting that Rove, who was actually providing a service by revealing Wilson's lies, should somehow be forced to resign.

I doubt most Americans care about this issue. Its not really a hot topic of discussion. Pretty much just partisan hacks, the media, various blogs and JFern types.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2005, 09:15:42 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2005, 09:18:51 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2005, 09:28:56 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.

Ummm, no it was blown by reporters.
Anyways, nice of you to call all of the lies that this war was based upon a non-issue. It's the most major issue for me. I want some leaders that I can trust to not start wars for no good reasons, and to not lie repeatedly.

First off, lets clear this out of the way. You are a dumbass. Ok that being established.

Bush did not "lie" to us. The facts stand that Saddam did have WMDs, did coddle and support terrorism (much like yourself). I have supported us finishing that bastard off since the US failed to do its' job the first time around. Bush did not start any war with Iraq. We were already in a state of war when Iraq decided to violate the ceasefire by firing upon our aircraft. So before you continue lying get your f'in facts straight or STFU, kthx.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2005, 12:50:22 AM »


Is King Fahd dead yet?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.