Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

1. She may have gone back to being undercover at a later date
2. Her "company" was outted too, hurting other undercover agents.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown. Another right-wing talking point debunked. I'm very angry at you Republicans for not caring about the integrity of our country, and instead mindlessly repeating talking points that defend Rove and Bush. You hate American, not me.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507150010

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.

Ummm, no it was blown by reporters.
Anyways, nice of you to call all of the lies that this war was based upon a non-issue. It's the most major issue for me. I want some leaders that I can trust to not start wars for no good reasons, and to not lie repeatedly.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.

Ummm, no it was blown by reporters.
Anyways, nice of you to call all of the lies that this war was based upon a non-issue. It's the most major issue for me. I want some leaders that I can trust to not start wars for no good reasons, and to not lie repeatedly.

First off, lets clear this out of the way. You are a dumbass. Ok that being established.

Bush did not "lie" to us. The facts stand that Saddam did have WMDs, did coddle and support terrorism (much like yourself). I have supported us finishing that bastard off since the US failed to do its' job the first time around. Bush did not start any war with Iraq. We were already in a state of war when Iraq decided to violate the ceasefire by firing upon our aircraft. So before you continue lying get your f'in facts straight or STFU, kthx.

Where are the WMD, wise guy? I support terrorism? You seem to not think it's a big deal that Bush ignored the 8/06/01 memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US". You are the terrorist supporter.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Wilson is a proven liar.

Prove it

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Wilson is a proven liar.

Prove it

Already done in the other threads on this topic.  Read there.

Already debunked.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Wilson is a proven liar.

Prove it

Already done in the other threads on this topic.  Read there.

Already debunked.

Is King Fahd dead yet?

Wow, what a logical argument.