Why can't we go back to the Eisenhower tax code? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:20:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Why can't we go back to the Eisenhower tax code? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why can't we go back to the Eisenhower tax code?  (Read 6367 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: December 06, 2016, 07:44:32 PM »
« edited: December 06, 2016, 07:50:10 PM by DC Al Fine »

Also: note I say "Eisenhower" but what i really mean is the 50s....  I imagine being a Republican, Dwight was not really a fan of those high tax rates. 

and does anyone know if there were tax cuts in 1953-1954 after Republicans had a trifecta?

Nothing material

Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2016, 08:02:12 PM »

From what I've heard, weren't those 50's tax rates very very high?*

Technically yes, effectively no.

Wouldn't we be able to have so much more revenue to do the things we all want to do: balance the budget, make huge payments to get us out of debt, and have the first surplus in 16 years if we simply just went back to a tax code where the people that actually had the most money to spare were asked to pay much higher rates?

Not really, no. See above.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2016, 08:14:27 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2016, 08:19:25 PM by DC Al Fine »

To be less cryptic: You are decrying a combination of tax cuts and new loopholes arising since the 1950's and the 1980's in particular. The former is true but the latter is the exact opposite. It was much, much easier to reduce one's income tax burden through a variety of measures (e.g. More deductions, income smoothing, running quasi-personal expenditures through a business etc.) in the 1950's than now.  This resulted in next to no one actually paying the top rates.

I mean yes, the rich could probably stand to pay a few more percentage points, but the idea that the budget can be solved by taxing the rich is a farce.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.