John Glenn vs Ronald Reagan 1984
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 08:20:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  John Glenn vs Ronald Reagan 1984
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: John Glenn vs Ronald Reagan 1984  (Read 1272 times)
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,929
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 08, 2016, 11:34:03 PM »

With the passing of the late great John Glenn I cant help but wonder if he would have been nominated in 1984 what might the map have looked like? Would he have chosen a bold VP pick like Ferraro or another male?....
Logged
Mike67
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 396
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2016, 11:39:30 PM »

With the passing of the late great John Glenn I cant help but wonder if he would have been nominated in 1984 what might the map have looked like? Would he have chosen a bold VP pick like Ferraro or another male?....

Gary Hart would have been a good VP pick for John Glenn
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2016, 11:24:33 AM »

No Democrat could have defeated Reagan in 1984, but Glenn would have made it a much more competitive race.

The year for Glenn to run would have been either 1988 or 1976, though he may have been considered too inexperienced yet in 1976 since he had only been in the Senate for two years (national celebrity notwithstanding).
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2016, 11:57:57 AM »

No Democrat could have defeated Reagan in 1984, but Glenn would have made it a much more competitive race.

The year for Glenn to run would have been either 1988 or 1976, though he may have been considered too inexperienced yet in 1976 since he had only been in the Senate for two years (national celebrity notwithstanding).
1976 would have been a good year for any competent Democrat, but Glenn would be basically running as a celebrity with less than 1/3 of a Senate term, not to mention a Republican would take his Senate seat. His year would have definitely been 1988, where he would have won if he chose a more "mainstream" running mate, like Bentsen
Logged
Mike67
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 396
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2016, 12:01:24 PM »

No Democrat could have defeated Reagan in 1984, but Glenn would have made it a much more competitive race.

The year for Glenn to run would have been either 1988 or 1976, though he may have been considered too inexperienced yet in 1976 since he had only been in the Senate for two years (national celebrity notwithstanding).
1976 would have been a good year for any competent Democrat, but Glenn would be basically running as a celebrity with less than 1/3 of a Senate term, not to mention a Republican would take his Senate seat. His year would have definitely been 1988, where he would have won if he chose a more "mainstream" running mate, like Bentsen

A very interesting ticket in 1988 would have been John Glenn for President and Mike Dukakis for VP.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2016, 03:59:58 PM »

No Democrat could have defeated Reagan in 1984, but Glenn would have made it a much more competitive race.

The year for Glenn to run would have been either 1988 or 1976, though he may have been considered too inexperienced yet in 1976 since he had only been in the Senate for two years (national celebrity notwithstanding).
1976 would have been a good year for any competent Democrat, but Glenn would be basically running as a celebrity with less than 1/3 of a Senate term, not to mention a Republican would take his Senate seat. His year would have definitely been 1988, where he would have won if he chose a more "mainstream" running mate, like Bentsen

A very interesting ticket in 1988 would have been John Glenn for President and Mike Dukakis for VP.

Yeah, a technocrat like Dukakis would've been better off as  Vice President rather than being the face of the party/ticket as the Presidential nominee.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.