Oklahoma may require restroom signs in anti-abortion effort

[JA]

https://apnews.com/c76e852b4ec948f7be4ccf9eda02a8a1/Oklahoma-may-require-restroom-signs-in-anti-abortion-effort?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Mike67]

Freedom Law

[Gass3268]

Yuck

[JA]

Freedom Law

Isn't this an example of government intrusion on the rights of businesses? Is that not decried by the GOP when government mandates businesses serve LGBTQ individuals? And isn't a $2.3 million expense like this also an example of meddlesome regulations?

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

bizarre tbh

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

>Jokelahoma

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Freedom Law

Isn't this an example of government intrusion on the rights of businesses? Is that not decried by the GOP when government mandates businesses serve LGBTQ individuals? And isn't a $2.3 million expense like this also an example of meddlesome regulations?

Government small enough to fit inside your pussy.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

OK is literally the worst state in the union.......

[RI]

How dare the government give people information!

[Gass3268]

How dare the government give people information!

So you are okay with California requiring Crisis Pregnancy Centers that abortion is an safe option?

[RI]

How dare the government give people information!

So you are okay with California requiring Crisis Pregnancy Centers that abortion is an safe option?

That's an opinion not a fact.

[Bojack Horseman]

 This is so stupid I don't even know what to say.

[Gass3268]

How dare the government give people information!

So you are okay with California requiring Crisis Pregnancy Centers that abortion is an safe option?

That's an opinion not a fact.

What Oklahoma is doing here is also an opinion not a fact.

[KingSweden]

I fail to see how this will prevent abortions

[RINO Tom]

Freedom Law

Isn't this an example of government intrusion on the rights of businesses? Is that not decried by the GOP when government mandates businesses serve LGBTQ individuals? And isn't a $2.3 million expense like this also an example of meddlesome regulations?

Yes to both, which is why it's stupid.

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Any law that could stop one person from getting an abortion and demonstrate that they are terrible, terrible things is a freedom law.

[DrScholl]

Pointless law and a waste of resources for businesses.

[KingSweden]

Any law that could stop one person from getting an abortion and demonstrate that they are terrible, terrible things is a freedom law.

So do you support making preventative (not Plan B) contraception more available? Seems the best laws to prevent abortion are ones that help people avoid unintended pregnancies

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Any law that could stop one person from getting an abortion and demonstrate that they are terrible, terrible things is a freedom law.

So do you support making preventative (not Plan B) contraception more available? Seems the best laws to prevent abortion are ones that help people avoid unintended pregnancies

I don't have a problem with contraception other than Plan B being available

[progressive85]

I think its a harmless law and it may actually help women who really want to keep their babies but are being pressured by a man to get rid of it find safe places to go.

[JA]

Any law that could stop one person from getting an abortion and demonstrate that they are terrible, terrible things is a freedom law.

How does the government have any right to mandate that a business use its own money to advertise something that, while potentially helpful to a woman, could be viewed as a political position? Would it be acceptable for the government to mandate that businesses direct women to places where they could receive an abortion? Or is the only difference between the two that you oppose abortion?

[SWE]

How dare the government give people information!

So you are okay with California requiring Crisis Pregnancy Centers that abortion is an safe option?

That's an opinion not a fact.

What Oklahoma is doing here is also an opinion not a fact.

How so? Sounds like all they're doing is providing women with information as to where they can go to get help should they choose to carry out their pregnancy.

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Any law that could stop one person from getting an abortion and demonstrate that they are terrible, terrible things is a freedom law.

How does the government have any right to mandate that a business use its own money to advertise something that, while potentially helpful to a woman, could be viewed as a political position? Would it be acceptable for the government to mandate that businesses direct women to places where they could receive an abortion? Or is the only difference between the two that you oppose abortion?

Basically, ending abortion is such a justified cause that the ends justify the means (as long as you aren't killing people)

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

How dare the government give people information!

So you are okay with California requiring Crisis Pregnancy Centers that abortion is an safe option?

That's an opinion not a fact.

What Oklahoma is doing here is also an opinion not a fact.

How so? Sounds like all they're doing is providing women with information as to where they can go to get help should they choose to carry out their pregnancy.

i would tend to doubt that oklahoma's recommended centres actually help women in any way

[Mercenary]

I am pr life but that is a bad law. It is worse since they want businesses to pay for it.