MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:42:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 119
Author Topic: MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25  (Read 231834 times)
rob in cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,982
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1275 on: May 24, 2017, 10:56:12 AM »

  Has Wicks run much of a visible campaign, and is he trying to tailor his appeal either toward the left or right?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1276 on: May 24, 2017, 11:43:39 AM »

Questions Continue to Swell: No Record That Rob Quist Registered for Selective Service Says National Archives
Washington Free Beacon/Brent Scher
May 24, 2017 5:00 am

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is probably the last oppo dump on Quist - and likely too late to have any effect anyway.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1277 on: May 24, 2017, 11:45:14 AM »

If that had been released earlier on, that could have made a big impact. Bad idea by the GOP to do it so late.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1278 on: May 24, 2017, 12:08:26 PM »

Why do so many people on the left here think Quist will win? Outside of (very) dubious google polling, we have actual firms showing +15 (emerson), +14 (gravis), and +7 (change).

This isn't GA-6 where trump won by only 1.5, this is a statewide election where trump won by 20.

Is there any evidence that quist will win here? At all?
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1279 on: May 24, 2017, 12:11:53 PM »

Why do so many people on the left here think Quist will win? Outside of (very) dubious google polling, we have actual firms showing +15 (emerson), +14 (gravis), and +7 (change).

This isn't GA-6 where trump won by only 1.5, this is a statewide election where trump won by 20.

Is there any evidence that quist will win here? At all?

Consider the Republican Candidate, A candidate for Governor in 2016 who voters may be weary of, who has flipped on the AHCA, an unpopular bill, has been subject to numerous attacks not only in this race but also in the Governor's race, and the fact that Quist has a decent campaign with a number of high profile and popular names campaigning with and backing him, in addition to numerous donations from small donors.  Quist won't win that's for sure, but he's made it far closer than anyone expected, in no small part thanks to Gianforte being a sub-par candidate.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,634


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1280 on: May 24, 2017, 12:19:49 PM »

Why do so many people on the left here think Quist will win? Outside of (very) dubious google polling, we have actual firms showing +15 (emerson), +14 (gravis), and +7 (change).

This isn't GA-6 where trump won by only 1.5, this is a statewide election where trump won by 20.

Is there any evidence that quist will win here? At all?

Consider the Republican Candidate, A candidate for Governor in 2016 who voters may be weary of, who has flipped on the AHCA, an unpopular bill, has been subject to numerous attacks not only in this race but also in the Governor's race, and the fact that Quist has a decent campaign with a number of high profile and popular names campaigning with and backing him, in addition to numerous donations from small donors.  Quist won't win that's for sure, but he's made it far closer than anyone expected, in no small part thanks to Gianforte being a sub-par candidate.

Yes, exactly.  And if Gianforte wins narrowly, which is what I expect, the GOP will probably try to spin it as the voters rejecting Democratic liberalism.   But if the margin is in single digits, that should be a huge warning sign to the GOP.
Logged
Bakersfield Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,738
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1281 on: May 24, 2017, 12:55:01 PM »


That was a really good read. Thanks for sharing!

Questions Continue to Swell: No Record That Rob Quist Registered for Selective Service Says National Archives
Washington Free Beacon/Brent Scher
May 24, 2017 5:00 am

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is probably the last oppo dump on Quist - and likely too late to have any effect anyway.

So, he didn't register during the Vietnam era? That would make me want to vote for him even more.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1282 on: May 24, 2017, 01:02:37 PM »
« Edited: May 24, 2017, 01:04:11 PM by MT Treasurer »

Consider the Republican Candidate, A candidate for Governor in 2016 who voters may be weary of, who has flipped on the AHCA, an unpopular bill, has been subject to numerous attacks not only in this race but also in the Governor's race, and the fact that Quist has a decent campaign with a number of high profile and popular names campaigning with and backing him, in addition to numerous donations from small donors.  Quist won't win that's for sure, but he's made it far closer than anyone expected, in no small part thanks to Gianforte being a sub-par candidate.

If Gianforte is a subpar candidate, then what is Quist? Don't get me wrong, but blaming Gianforte for the closeness of this race is ridiculous. For the most part, he's run a pretty good campaign (which is why I still think he will win), even though I think he would make a better governor than Congressman, honestly. I can think of only one Republican (Ed Buttrey) who would have done better than Gianforte (and even that's a big if). Yes, he doesn't have a lot of crossover appeal, that's true, but there isn't any Montana Republican other than maybe Tim Fox who would have won over more (Democratic-leaning) Independents here, especially with Trump in the White House. This idea that Ken Miller, Carl Glimm, Ed Walker, or any other Republican nominee would have been spared from Democratic attack ads (Remember Denny Rehberg and Rick Hill, anyone?) is beyond ridiculous. So if Republicans lose this race, the last conclusion they should draw from this is that it only happened "because Quist ran a great campaign and Gianforte ran an awful one". Both of these things aren't true. A loss here would be pretty devastating for the MT GOP, and I have no doubt that both sides will do a lot of "spinning" tomorrow.

As for why the race is close... Montana Democrats have always done well in statewide and Senate races here and Quist can - despite all of his flaws - appeal to many people in the state, especially "Independents" who didn't like Clinton (yes, Trump won by 20 points, but like I said, it would have been much closer with any other Democratic nominee). The Democrats also have a high floor in the state and some of the attacks against Gianforte ("rich multimillionaire from NJ who wants to sell off public lands, cut access to health insurance and slash education funding) are resonating with a non-negligible number of voters and make it easy for Quist to rally his base, especially since the Democrats used basically the same attacks against him in the gubernatorial race in 2016. Plus, Quist is benefiting from a strong ground game, higher Democratic enthusiasm (probably), support from the national Democratic party, donations from small donors, the health care debate, etc.
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,109


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1283 on: May 24, 2017, 01:05:10 PM »

My final prediction:

Gianforte (R): 49.5%
Quist (D): 47.5%
Wicks (L): 3%

I want to believe Quist can win, and he still might be able to. But I think Gianforte is narrowly favored.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1284 on: May 24, 2017, 01:45:00 PM »

As of 5/23:

County (2016 Presidential vote, Gubernatorial vote) % returned

Cascade (voted for Trump by 22%, Bullock by 10%) 68.3% of mail-ins returned (+2.9)

Flathead (voted for Trump by 36%, Gianforte by 15%) 72.2% of mail-ins returned (+4.8 )

Gallatin (voted for Clinton by 1%, Bullock by 15%) 65.4% of mail-ins returned (+2.9)

Lake (voted for Trump by 21%, Bullock by 1%) 76.3% of mail-ins returned (+4.7)

Lewis & Clark (voted for Trump by 7%, Bullock by 23%) 73.3% of mail-ins returned (+2.2)

Missoula (voted for Clinton by 16%, Bullock by 34%) 65.9% of mail-ins returned (+3.6)

Ravalli (voted for Trump by 38% Gianforte by 14%) 74.8% of mail-ins returned (+1.4)

Silver Bow (voted for Clinton by 14%, Bullock by 44%) 71.7% of mail-ins returned (+2.1)

Yellowstone (voted for Trump by 27%, Gianforte by 1%) 70.8% of mail-ins returned (+2.7)

STATEWIDE: 70.2% of mail-ins returned (+3.0)

Added the change (5/22-5/23) in brackets.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Gianforte loses, it won't be because of low turnout in Republican areas, that's for sure:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Link.
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1285 on: May 24, 2017, 01:51:15 PM »

As of 5/23:

County (2016 Presidential vote, Gubernatorial vote) % returned

Cascade (voted for Trump by 22%, Bullock by 10%) 68.3% of mail-ins returned (+2.9)

Flathead (voted for Trump by 36%, Gianforte by 15%) 72.2% of mail-ins returned (+4.8 )

Gallatin (voted for Clinton by 1%, Bullock by 15%) 65.4% of mail-ins returned (+2.9)

Lake (voted for Trump by 21%, Bullock by 1%) 76.3% of mail-ins returned (+4.7)

Lewis & Clark (voted for Trump by 7%, Bullock by 23%) 73.3% of mail-ins returned (+2.2)

Missoula (voted for Clinton by 16%, Bullock by 34%) 65.9% of mail-ins returned (+3.6)

Ravalli (voted for Trump by 38% Gianforte by 14%) 74.8% of mail-ins returned (+1.4)

Silver Bow (voted for Clinton by 14%, Bullock by 44%) 71.7% of mail-ins returned (+2.1)

Yellowstone (voted for Trump by 27%, Gianforte by 1%) 70.8% of mail-ins returned (+2.7)

STATEWIDE: 70.2% of mail-ins returned (+3.0)

Added the change (5/22-5/23) in brackets.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Gianforte loses, it won't be because of low turnout in Republican areas, that's for sure:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Link.

He loses or wins based on the margin in Yellowstone, I wonder what Bullock voters think of Quist.
Logged
Bakersfield Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,738
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1286 on: May 24, 2017, 02:49:06 PM »
« Edited: May 24, 2017, 02:52:11 PM by On Marchent »

Trump's recorded call going out to Montanans is against exploiting loopholes in state law. That same law is why polls have been few and rubbish.

Edit: WaPo is garbage at titles
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1287 on: May 24, 2017, 02:57:07 PM »


You have to use live operators to place a robo call in Montana.  That's one reason why we've gotten so few polls there.  It's more expensive to do so.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1288 on: May 24, 2017, 03:37:47 PM »

Why do so many people on the left here think Quist will win? Outside of (very) dubious google polling, we have actual firms showing +15 (emerson), +14 (gravis), and +7 (change).

This isn't GA-6 where trump won by only 1.5, this is a statewide election where trump won by 20.

Is there any evidence that quist will win here? At all?

You had a good case there, and I was listening, but when you gave Gravis credibility, you lost me. It's entirely possible that Gianforte wins, but I'll be darned if his margin of victory is anywhere higher the mid to upper single digits. There is little debate that Quist will do substantially to significantly better than Clinton, because that's almost a given. The quistion (pun intended) is whether he can pull it off or not, and it's probably likely that he will not.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1289 on: May 24, 2017, 04:12:52 PM »

Why do so many people on the left here think Quist will win? Outside of (very) dubious google polling, we have actual firms showing +15 (emerson), +14 (gravis), and +7 (change).

one is a bunch of college kids back in august, one is a new firm doing their first poll, and one is gravis.
Logged
Kantakouzenos
Rookie
**
Posts: 74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1290 on: May 24, 2017, 04:35:31 PM »

Two questions. 

What time do the polls close tomorrow, and what is a good website to use for watching the results come in county by county?
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1291 on: May 24, 2017, 04:43:51 PM »

Two questions. 

What time do the polls close tomorrow, and what is a good website to use for watching the results come in county by county?

1.) 10 PM EST = 8 PM MST.
2.) Definitely the NY Times. Their maps are excellent.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1292 on: May 24, 2017, 06:10:47 PM »

So this happened:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1293 on: May 24, 2017, 06:12:37 PM »

So this happened:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Proof?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1294 on: May 24, 2017, 06:14:35 PM »


usually published reporters do not randomly slander republican tech billionaires
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,119
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1295 on: May 24, 2017, 06:16:04 PM »

Republicans have gone totally insane.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1296 on: May 24, 2017, 06:21:37 PM »


audio coming up in a minute but we should trust one of the more serious journalists anyway.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1297 on: May 24, 2017, 06:24:27 PM »

All over Twitter now, Jacobs confirmed it really happened. Violent thug Gianforte. The party is maniacal.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1298 on: May 24, 2017, 06:28:02 PM »

relax for now, could easily have been an accident.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,646
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1299 on: May 24, 2017, 06:29:10 PM »

A Bob Etheridge moment?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 119  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 9 queries.