Anyone have links to the last polls on re-legalizing segregation/slavery?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:26:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Anyone have links to the last polls on re-legalizing segregation/slavery?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Anyone have links to the last polls on re-legalizing segregation/slavery?  (Read 1829 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 27, 2016, 02:00:30 AM »

Does anyone have links to the last legit national US polls on re-legalizing segregation and slavery/repealing the 13th-15th amendments?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2016, 08:07:16 PM »

Unless you're a hack who thinks this is such a poll, there probably isn't one.  Modern polling began well after the Reconstruction Era had passed.  You might find some polls on keeping segregation in the 40's to 60's, but unless Gallup has put some of its ancient polls online, I have no idea where you'd find them.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2016, 08:37:56 PM »

Unless you're a hack who thinks this is such a poll, there probably isn't one.  Modern polling began well after the Reconstruction Era had passed.  You might find some polls on keeping segregation in the 40's to 60's, but unless Gallup has put some of its ancient polls online, I have no idea where you'd find them.

You misunderstand.

I'm talking about polls done in the 1990's, 2000's, 2010's.

I remember seeing a poll that 10-20% of Americans want to bring back slavery.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,236
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2016, 09:47:51 PM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,283
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2016, 10:19:26 PM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,130
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2016, 10:24:26 PM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.
That's embarrassing.

Even worse: http://www.cnn.com/US/9903/12/interracial.marriage/
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Bigby
Mod_Libertarian_GOPer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,164
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: 3.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2016, 12:29:59 AM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

Why was this change necessary? I thought the Loving case made anti-miscegenation laws illegal in 1967? Was this merely symbolic?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,073
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2016, 12:43:19 AM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

Why was this change necessary? I thought the Loving case made anti-miscegenation laws illegal in 1967? Was this merely symbolic?

It was symbolic, but also necessary. If Loving had somehow been overturned before 2000, the ban would have been enforced again. Better safe than sorry.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2016, 07:07:17 PM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

Why was this change necessary? I thought the Loving case made anti-miscegenation laws illegal in 1967? Was this merely symbolic?

Yes, it was symbolic.

And yet so many STILL voted against it.




I bet if Gallup or Rasmussen or PPP, or whatever legit polling company, conducted a new poll on slavery and/or segregation... right now... the results would shock a lot of people. I'm betting it's now 20-30%.
Logged
I’m not Stu
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2016, 08:46:11 PM »
« Edited: December 28, 2016, 08:54:04 PM by ERM64man »







opinion of brown vs board ruling



Gallup polls from 1964:



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.







People have no idea today how unpopular the Civil Rights movement was...they were basically the SJWs of their time. Hell, if Ben Shapiro was alround back then, he would be calling MLK a cuck
They were not the SJWs of their time. I strongly disagree with that. That is an insult to the Civil Rights Movement. SJW movements today are not at all like the Civil Rights Movement, which was a real freedom movement. It is true the Civil Rights Movement was unpopular, but it wasn't wacky, it was a kind of activism that needs to be commended. There are some good people today who fight for equality who have important legitimate concerns who are not these wacky SJW loons. Anyone who wants to return to segregation or slavery is also a wacky loon; almost nobody supports that, except a few kooks.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,236
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2016, 10:56:04 PM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

Obviously some parts of the country are more supportive than others.

Also remember that people who vote are disproportionately older and whiter than the general public.  And this was 16 years ago.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,735


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2016, 11:16:32 PM »

Mississippi decided to ratify the 13th amendment. In 2013.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/02/mississippi-officially-abolishes-slavery-ratifies-13th-amendment/
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2016, 01:22:45 PM »


No we did it in the 1990s. We just screwed it up then and had to redo once we realized.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2016, 01:32:35 PM »

They had a poll on interracial marriage not that long ago.  Less than 15% were opposed.

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

Why was this change necessary? I thought the Loving case made anti-miscegenation laws illegal in 1967? Was this merely symbolic?

Yes, it was symbolic.

And yet so many STILL voted against it.




I bet if Gallup or Rasmussen or PPP, or whatever legit polling company, conducted a new poll on slavery and/or segregation... right now... the results would shock a lot of people. I'm betting it's now 20-30%.

I remember this vote quite well. There is an extremely good voter analysis somewhere on line by a grad student. He makes a compelling case that the black vote in favor of the amendment was better than 95 to 5, whereas sadly the white vote was esentially tied. Sad
Logged
kyc0705
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,756


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2016, 05:14:53 PM »


That's not really much better.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2016, 08:39:38 PM »

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

The counties that voted against it seem generally poorer and whiter than the state as a whole.

Most surprising is that the extremely Republican, wealthier suburban counties (Shelby, Elmore, Baldwin) voted for it. This wasn't strictly a partisan vote.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,130
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2016, 09:07:21 PM »

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

The counties that voted against it seem generally poorer and whiter than the state as a whole.

Most surprising is that the extremely Republican, wealthier suburban counties (Shelby, Elmore, Baldwin) voted for it. This wasn't strictly a partisan vote.
Well of course not. I expect wealthier whites would be more likely to either approve of interracial marriage or vote for repealing it to avoid appearing racist.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2016, 11:50:19 PM »

Alabama voted to remove its interracial marriage ban from the state constitution as recently as 2000.



59-41.

The counties that voted against it seem generally poorer and whiter than the state as a whole.

Most surprising is that the extremely Republican, wealthier suburban counties (Shelby, Elmore, Baldwin) voted for it. This wasn't strictly a partisan vote.

I don't find that surprising...
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2016, 03:06:40 AM »

Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2016, 11:22:38 AM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.254 seconds with 12 queries.