What is your opinion of Obama's performance as President?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:50:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What is your opinion of Obama's performance as President?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: In comparison to my expectations, Obama was...
#1
Much worse than expected
#2
Somewhat worse than expected
#3
Around the same
#4
Somewhat better than expected
#5
Much better than expected
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: What is your opinion of Obama's performance as President?  (Read 4552 times)
Saint Milei
DeadPrez
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,011


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -7.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 04, 2017, 04:07:26 AM »

Worst president ever
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2017, 01:44:32 PM »

Speaking of prescience, here's another post that I came across while combing through some of the old health care reform threads. It comes across as much more solemn today than it did over six years ago.

History will probably judge him badly for not being able to prevent the final victory of fascism, as well-meaning but ultimately ineffectual leader, though he really did about as well as he could given the circumstances.

Very strange coming from Lief!
Logged
PresidentSamTilden
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 507


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2017, 08:42:01 PM »

Speaking of prescience, here's another post that I came across while combing through some of the old health care reform threads. It comes across as much more solemn today than it did over six years ago.

History will probably judge him badly for not being able to prevent the final victory of fascism, as well-meaning but ultimately ineffectual leader, though he really did about as well as he could given the circumstances.

Respect is due...wow.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 05, 2017, 07:53:42 AM »

Speaking of prescience, here's another post that I came across while combing through some of the old health care reform threads. It comes across as much more solemn today than it did over six years ago.

History will probably judge him badly for not being able to prevent the final victory of fascism, as well-meaning but ultimately ineffectual leader, though he really did about as well as he could given the circumstances.

haha.  solemn?

More like sensationalistic, which is rather the opposite of solemn.  Also the channeling of opebo was a charming touch, though it lacks mention of The Bad Place.  

We have no idea how history will judge Obama.  He was a major disappointment to those of us who voted for him, but judging a president's legacy during the first few years after he leaves office, or while he is still in office, is a tricky business.  If you read the OP carefully, it does not ask you to do that.  It only asks your personal opinion of the president relative to your personal expectations upon his entering office.

Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 05, 2017, 09:35:47 PM »

relatively mainstream Democratic commentators

"relatively mainstream Democratic commentators" do not spend 18 months helping Donald Trump become president of the united states.  

The "Democratic commentator" in question made a very sensationalistic comment, but it was not one uncharacteristic of him, or of his on line persona, six years ago and today.

And yes, I have read anything else in this thread, in fact I have read all that has been posted in this thread, and your post was the most unrelated to the original topic among them, and the only one deserving to be called out as unrelated to the OP.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 06, 2017, 08:25:57 AM »

That description was not in reference to Lief, and I'm still struggling to understand your point.

It was only that solemnity is not the description that comes to my mind when I read the post you quoted, the one totally unrelated to this thread.
Logged
PresidentSamTilden
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 507


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: January 06, 2017, 09:24:03 PM »

I think it's solemn...in 2010, calling republicans fascist was a "haha" thing. Now it's an "oh crap" thing, with Trump very much playing the part of Authoritarian. Most liberals view Trump's victory as a punch in the face and the curtain raiser on a suddenly frightening future...solemn fits that feeling pretty well.

Of course, if you support Trump, you won't get it - but it does make sense to the people who feel that way.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: January 07, 2017, 07:46:22 PM »

in 2010, calling republicans fascist was a "haha" thing.

Just as it was in 2000 and again in 1980, as I well remember.  I suspect it was like that even before then, but I wouldn't know personally.  Nothing was solemn about it then and nothing is solemn about it now.  Look up the word sometime, you'll find that calling Republicans fascist is, in fact, the opposite of solemnity.  It is sensationalism, just as calling Obama a socialist (or, better yet, a Muslim) is sensationalist.  Those who do it think it's cute, I suppose--and apparently some of those who hear or read it think it's cute as well, as you and Averroës and the Fox News Channel remind us--but solemn is what it is not. 
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: January 08, 2017, 12:35:08 PM »

I expected little but his performance was still much worse than I could've ever expected. His weak 'leadership' foreign policy and general portrayal of weakness was incredibly detrimental and his betrayal of Israel was appalling. His supreme court justices are incredibly liberal. Throughout his eight years My family lost or health insurance only to get a new one that is worse than before with 3 times that of what we paid before. He continuely lied and overreached his authority. He did nothing to help my family at all. He doesn't care about me or my family. Granted my parents have seen their business flourish in the past few years, but the only thing Obamacare did was hinder them and hurt their employees. I'm incredibly excited for a president who I believe  cares about me and my family to be in office and who has already laid out policies to help the middle class. his entire tenure has been marred by policy failure and foreign policy bill under. The saving grace: he built his legacy on sand using executive orders and failed to help the Democratic  party avoid utter decimation. Frankly, I would be upset with him even if I was a Democrat.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: January 08, 2017, 12:44:12 PM »

Better than expected. He didn't do a far left turn and was surprisingly liberal on social issues.

That being said, I'm still disappointed about his approach concerning the NSA.
Logged
Waterfall
Rookie
**
Posts: 118
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 19, 2017, 11:01:00 PM »

Who could have had any confident expectations to begin with? Obama had never done hardly anything when he became president. I don't understand how anyone can answer the question meaningfully.
Logged
JustinTimeCuber
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,323
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2017, 12:36:22 PM »

Kyle Kulinski gave him like a 68% I think
Tend to agree with that
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 21, 2017, 12:57:37 PM »

I'm still disappointed about his approach concerning the NSA.

Agreed. I had hoped he would make meaningful changes, but nope. This is one area where I find little difference between the two parties. Both of have defenders of privacy rights, and Democrats may in some cases pay more lip service to reducing the power of this surveillance behemoth, but in the end nothing ever gets done.

Obama could have made a lot of big changes in this regard and yet he didn't, with the end result being him handing arguably the world's most powerful surveillance apparatus to Donald Fking Trump.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2017, 01:05:36 PM »

Let's face it, we have no clue what information a President has when he makes decisions like those involving the NSA (a horrible hideous agency).

Perhaps Obama felt the good outweighed the bad.  We have know way to know, but yes, he had a chance and he didn't take it.  Why?  It seems like he thought it would be worse than letting the monster roam free.
Logged
Torie
Moderator
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2017, 02:27:15 PM »

Let's face it, we have no clue what information a President has when he makes decisions like those involving the NSA (a horrible hideous agency).

Perhaps Obama felt the good outweighed the bad.  We have know way to know, but yes, he had a chance and he didn't take it.  Why?  It seems like he thought it would be worse than letting the monster roam free.

What monster did you have in mind?
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 21, 2017, 04:22:35 PM »

Let's face it, we have no clue what information a President has when he makes decisions like those involving the NSA (a horrible hideous agency).

Perhaps Obama felt the good outweighed the bad.  We have know way to know, but yes, he had a chance and he didn't take it.  Why?  It seems like he thought it would be worse than letting the monster roam free.

What monster did you have in mind?

The NSA, of course.
Logged
(Still) muted by Kalwejt until March 31
Eharding
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,934


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 21, 2017, 08:19:23 PM »

First term somewhat better than I expected, second term much, much worse. I expected him to be better than W. Bush, and I was badly disappointed by his being worse. What a disgrace this country's in.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 21, 2017, 09:03:34 PM »

Somewhat better than expected, though amusingly my experience is totally counter to Eharding's. The first term, and probably including the year 2013, was godawful, but then towards the end we actually had a decent presidency for a few years (Obama was actually doing pretty well 2014-2015, in hindsight), but then started to drop the ball at the very end of his term, again, and was particularly awful during his final lame duck period. Better than I expected, since I had very low expectations of him back in 2009, but still not that great on the whole.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 14 queries.