2016: Sanders/Warren vs. Kasich/Rubio

[SingingAnalyst]

Would the campaign, as well as voter's approval ratings of the candidates, been more positive? (18% disapproved both Trump and Clinton; only 2% approved both).
Would the by-state correlation between education and GOP voting be less strongly negative?
Would the age and income gradients have been stronger?

Discuss with maps.

[Kingpoleon]

350: John Kasich/Marco Rubio - 53.5%
188: Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren - 44.4%
Others - 2.1%

Kasich won 53.5% of the vote, the most since 1984.

[JustinTimeCuber]

lol it's hard to imagine Sanders losing NH, but also ME, MN, WI, MI, CO.

[OSR stands with Israel]

350: John Kasich/Marco Rubio - 53.5%
188: Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren - 44.4%
Others - 2.1%

Kasich won 53.5% of the vote, the most since 1984.

This plus New Mexico- Maine at large

[MAINEiac4434]

lol it's hard to imagine Sanders losing NH, but also ME, MN, WI, MI, CO.

No it isn't. It'd be extremely easy to portray Sanders as some wild-eyed radical and Kasich would be a very acceptable Republican candidate for northern New England and the Rust Belt.