Intell
Junior Chimp
Posts: 6,817
Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24
|
 |
« on: January 11, 2017, 09:01:39 PM » |
|
The first question was sh**t to begin with, characterising eminent domain, and property rights in the same boat as freedom of speech, media and assembly.
The fourth question is also dumb as it conflates interventionism with humanitarian internationalism, and internationalism, with foreign entangling alliances such as NATO, I presume. It has no foreign policy to be used for the push for peace and human rights around the world, cooperating with the international world to defeat ISIS and other islamofacists terrorist organisations, while opposing human rights abuses and trying to rectify them in islamic contours, or african dictatorships, through a strong foreign policy, that is not interventionist, is peaceful, but is still internationalist, and looks out for others, and looks out for others not through NATO, but through the UN.
|
