Party Focus Question (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:31:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Party Focus Question (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which would you rather see your party emphasize on the campaign trail: economic/class issues, or social/cultural issues?
#1
Economic/Class (D)
 
#2
Economic/Class (R)
 
#3
Social/Cultural (D)
 
#4
Social/Cultural (R)
 
#5
Not a D or an R
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Author Topic: Party Focus Question  (Read 984 times)
Derpist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 997
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -2.96

« on: January 14, 2017, 12:49:55 AM »

Social cultural. There's only one culturally sane party left in this country, though I don't really care for supply side economics.
Logged
Derpist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 997
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -2.96

« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2017, 04:34:50 PM »

We should through this dichotomy out the window, along with vague polemic uses of the term "neoliberalism."

There's nothing vague about neoliberalism. It's a very specific, very definite set of political, economic and moral beliefs and assumptions with a very narrow base of advocates (although a plethora of useful idiots) and translating into very concrete policies.

A narrow base of advocates that apparently run most of our political and economic and media institutions. The entire Obama administration is proof that those advocates matter.
Logged
Derpist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 997
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -2.96

« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2017, 07:37:57 AM »

We should through this dichotomy out the window, along with vague polemic uses of the term "neoliberalism."

There's nothing vague about neoliberalism. It's a very specific, very definite set of political, economic and moral beliefs and assumptions with a very narrow base of advocates (although a plethora of useful idiots) and translating into very concrete policies.

That's a rather vague description for something so specific.

The term over the decades has meant social market ordoliberalism, been used as a broad category including both Austrian and Chicago schools - among others, a synonym for 'Third Way' Blairites and New Democrats , and now whatever this thing is that you are talking about. The term is more confusing than enlightening.

I'd argue that the Austrian/Chicago schools have almost no real life influence, so we're really talking about Blairism, which is the dominant ideology of Davos, Bilderberg, etc.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 15 queries.