DisruptJ20

[EnglishPete]

First part of what looks like a very interesting James O'Keefe report on the #disruptJ20 anti-Trump inaugural protests. Just as left wing thugs were previously exposed by O'Keefe as being behind violence around Trump rallies it looks like the same sort are planning the same sort of thing for the inauguration

James O'Keefe
‏@JamesOKeefeIII
BREAKING: Undercover video exposes groups plotting criminal activity and violence at @realDonaldTrump inauguration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHZSfhd1X_8

[Grumpier Than Thou]

First part of what looks like a very interesting James O'Keefe report

Well, there goes both this story's credibility and my interest.

[Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy]

The Acorn guy? yeah...

[Deblano]

First part of what looks like a very interesting James O'Keefe report

Well, there goes both this story's credibility and my interest.

"muh soros conspiracy!!11!1!!!1!"

[Ban my account ffs!]

Fake news. 

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

[SWE]

Hopefully this is true.

[EnglishPete]

O'Keefe on Sean Hannity radio show now

[GlobeSoc]

The Acorn guy? yeah...

[Dr. Arch]

First part of what looks like a very interesting James O'Keefe report

Well, there goes both this story's credibility and my interest.

[Devout Centrist]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

[EnglishPete]

Looks like the criminal leftist element are going to be on their guard

[EnglishPete]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/821112040899092485

[Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy]

Looks like the criminal leftist element are going to be on their guard

OK? Even assuming this is real ...Some random guy made a sh**tty Word document.. so what?

[JA]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

He's a conspiracy theorist. There's literally nothing you can do or say to convince him his sources and beliefs could be wrong. Trust me, I've been one before and I know what it does to you.

[EnglishPete]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Green Line]

F.A.K.E.  N.E.W.S. 

Suck it

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

There's literally nothing you can do or say to convince him his sources and beliefs could be wrong.

You mean like people who are convinced that CNN and The Washington Post are reliable and trustworthy news sources?

[EnglishPete]

F.A.K.E.  N.E.W.S. 

Suck it

I think you're someone else who is confusing Project Veritas with the Washington Post

[DrScholl]

Oh, how ominous.

[Wells]

Hopefully this is true.

[JA]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

There's literally nothing you can do or say to convince him his sources and beliefs could be wrong.

You mean like people who are convinced that CNN and The Washington Post are reliable and trustworthy news sources?

Oh yes, the fact that the two sources you mentioned are generally considered reputable and are staffed by professionals within their field makes them less trustworthy than some guy spouting nonsensical conspiracy theories via his twitter. Again, I understand that you reject the very basis of those sources, since you consider their professional credentials suspect at best and any alignment with the establishment immediate grounds for being discredited. As I said, you're a conspiracy theorist who rejects universities, reputable news agencies, and so on as agents of left-wing propaganda, whose discoveries and discourse is heavily skewed by an inherent or learned bias; therefore, the only trustworthy sources are free agents who report via online social media outlets.

I know what you believe; I've believed it as well. That's why I'm not trying to convince you of anything, because I know that I can't.

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

There's literally nothing you can do or say to convince him his sources and beliefs could be wrong.

You mean like people who are convinced that CNN and The Washington Post are reliable and trustworthy news sources?

Oh yes, the fact that the two sources you mentioned are generally considered reputable and are staffed by professionals within their field makes them less trustworthy than some guy spouting nonsensical conspiracy theories via his twitter. Again, I understand that you reject the very basis of those sources, since you consider their professional credentials suspect at best and any alignment with the establishment immediate grounds for being discredited. As I said, you're a conspiracy theorist who rejects universities, reputable news agencies, and so on as agents of left-wing propaganda, whose discoveries and discourse is heavily skewed by an inherent or learned bias; therefore, the only trustworthy sources are free agents who report via online social media outlets.

I don't agree with that. Free agents who report via online social media outlets aren't trustworthy at all. In every case whether its the Washington Post or Project Veritas or just some guy on twitter a report has to be judged on the evidence provided to back up its claims examined in the light of reason. Conspiracy theories are ten a penny and most of them are rubbish or just plain disinfo. The report by Project Veritas isn't a 'conspiracy theory' its an undercover report showing some people planning a crime on video.

[Fusionmunster]

Nobody in their right mind takes O'Keefe seriously.