2016: Jeb/Kasich v. Clinton/Kaine v. Sanders/Brown
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 07:01:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2016: Jeb/Kasich v. Clinton/Kaine v. Sanders/Brown
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016: Jeb/Kasich v. Clinton/Kaine v. Sanders/Brown  (Read 676 times)
RC (a la Frémont)
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,271
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -6.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 19, 2017, 02:03:51 PM »

Republican Primary Scenario: Donald Trump doesn't do well in the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries and drops out. During those primaries and future ones, Jeb Bush has a significantly higher poll rating than most candidates running, with the exception of Ted Cruz, who he mostly focuses on battling for the nomination during the primaries. Jeb wins the nomination, he taps Kasich for his VP nominee. He grudgingly accepts, being quoted before as saying that "he would not accept a Vice President nomination."

Democratic Primary Scenario: The primaries go the same as in IRL, with the DNC and the Clinton campaign screwing over Sanders. Hillary receives the Democratic nomination, but Sanders does not endorse Clinton, instead opting to run as an Independent. Sanders chooses Oregon Governor Kate Brown for Vice President.

So, the 2016 election is set, with Jeb and Kasich being significantly more popular than Trump IRL, and Sanders attracting much of the Millenial vote and some regular democratic votes. How would the election turn out? Discuss using maps.
Logged
tomhguy
Rookie
**
Posts: 122
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -1.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2017, 02:47:42 PM »
« Edited: January 21, 2017, 03:54:59 AM by tomhguy »



Logged
DPKdebator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,080
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.81, S: 3.65

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2017, 09:05:38 PM »

Considering Sanders was running an independent campaign, I find it hard to have him winning 50-60% in NH, the best he could do is probably a 30-45% plurality.
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,978
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2017, 08:20:50 PM »

Practical repeat of 1912.
The Republicans are Wilson.
Clinton is Taft.
Sanders is Roosevelt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.