Who was the better leader for China after Deng Xiaoping?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:39:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Who was the better leader for China after Deng Xiaoping?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the better leader for China after Deng Xiaoping?
#1
Jiang Zemin
 
#2
Hu Jintao
 
#3
Xi Jinping
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: Who was the better leader for China after Deng Xiaoping?  (Read 673 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,662


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 14, 2017, 10:29:25 AM »

.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,314
Papua New Guinea


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2017, 12:27:09 PM »

Hu. The other two were/are awful.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2017, 11:43:14 PM »

Jiang. He became leader by accident after the Tiananmen Square crackdown, and steered China through some pretty turbulent times which easily could have gone pear-shaped.

Hu accomplished nothing big, and simply coasted along the cheap-labour-and-investment boom.

Xi is a big enigma. He's done so much to consolidate his power, but it's still unclear what exactly he wants to accomplish. But when you have his pictures in public places you know something's not right.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,568
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2017, 07:05:04 PM »

Ever the optimist, I was hoping that Xi Jinping would have been the leader to reformed the state-owned enterprises system, create a social safety net on par with Taiwan's model, and move the country's economy away from exports towards consumerism instead.  His consolidation of power (I assumed) would enable him to do that.  And then whoever comes after him would begin the long-awaited process of political liberalization. 

Logged
peterthlee
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
China


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2017, 09:29:57 AM »

Xi, just because he abolished the immunity for Politburo standing committee members from charges of corruption (this might be just a tactic for targeting his foes in the CCP). In addition, he was firmly held onto the sovereignty principles (South China Sea, East China Sea, etc). You might disagree with my opinion, but this is what a pan-Chinese nationalist, like me, believe in.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2017, 04:14:55 PM »

Hu or Xi. I have not heard good things about Jiang.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,518
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2017, 08:45:42 AM »

Xi then Jiang then Hu. I had a lot of high hopes for Hu but in the end he was all talk and lacked the real power to push through necessary economic reforms even though the conditions were ripe for such reforms.  Xi is making more progress even in a much more difficult environment.  Part of it of course was post-1995 Jiang had a free reign as Deng faded away while Hu (who was anointed by Deng and was never Jiang's pick to succeed him) had to grapple with an active behind-the-scenes Jiang.  Under Xi both Hu and Jiang has pretty much faded into the background giving him much more free reign.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 14 queries.