British PM: Trump Told Her He Supports NATO 100%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 03:36:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  British PM: Trump Told Her He Supports NATO 100%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: British PM: Trump Told Her He Supports NATO 100%  (Read 1092 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,509
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 29, 2017, 04:26:15 PM »

http://www.politico.com/video/2017/01/british-pm-trump-confirmed-he-is-100-percent-behind-nato-062097
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2017, 07:03:41 PM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,192
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2017, 07:40:29 PM »

Although both are full of bluster, this is very much a case of a stoppable force meeting a movable object.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2017, 10:21:12 AM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,178
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2017, 10:23:33 AM »

Bullsh**t, the only thing Donald Trump supports 100% is himself.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,612
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2017, 10:41:59 AM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.
Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.
I don't count on Republican Senators for anything anymore, and neither should you. They will always fall in line.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,221


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2017, 10:51:38 AM »

Trump also told his creditors he will pay their bills 100%, and his wives he will be faithful to them 100%.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,285


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2017, 12:07:51 PM »

Although both are full of bluster, this is very much a case of a stoppable force meeting a movable object.

This made me lol.

I'm pretty sure May heard what she wanted to hear.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2017, 01:39:58 AM »

Yuhh, NATO is horrible.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2017, 11:13:38 AM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.
Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.
I don't count on Republican Senators for anything anymore, and neither should you. They will always fall in line.
This wouldn't be just confirming a cabinet secretary, this would be radically changing America's place in the World and indeed the entire alignment of world geopolitics. Most likely they just wouldn't let it come up for vote in the Senate in order to avoid voting against the President.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,612
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2017, 01:10:36 PM »

This wouldn't be just confirming a cabinet secretary, this would be radically changing America's place in the World and indeed the entire alignment of world geopolitics.
Which... is exactly what the Trump administration wants? Expect anything crazy.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,367


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2017, 05:17:19 PM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.

Why would the Pussygrabber regime pay any more attention to treaties, than to the Constitution and court orders?
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,221


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2017, 05:26:35 PM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.

Why would the Pussygrabber regime pay any more attention to treaties, than to the Constitution and court orders?
...because every adversary (and frienemy, and even the pluckier allies) of the US will also decide to ignore the treaties which enshrine the US as the world's dominant power?
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,367


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2017, 01:18:35 AM »

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.

Why would the Pussygrabber regime pay any more attention to treaties, than to the Constitution and court orders?
...because every adversary (and frienemy, and even the pluckier allies) of the US will also decide to ignore the treaties which enshrine the US as the world's dominant power?

You're hoping for rational self interest from a regime that spent the past two weeks needlessly shooting itself in the ass?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.