GA-6 Special election discussion thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:37:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  GA-6 Special election discussion thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 ... 120
Author Topic: GA-6 Special election discussion thread  (Read 250206 times)
Jeppe
Bosse
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,806
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1375 on: April 18, 2017, 09:16:32 PM »

Almost 47%
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1376 on: April 18, 2017, 09:16:48 PM »

Pretty cool that he's doing this much better than I expected.

Once again the GOP posters are moving the goal post.

Once again ShadowsOverwhateverwhatever mucking up the thread with his TYT induced nonsense.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,476
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1377 on: April 18, 2017, 09:16:59 PM »

and ? the goal is not to beat trump, the goal is to get 50%+

A goal is to get 50%+. That would have been amazing, and few people projected it here.

If he's scoring at 48 or 49%, that's a very good position to be in heading into the runoff. Better than the low 40s showing in the polls where he'd never make up the gap to 50.



you are right but 2 hours ago, expectations were that ossoff would win without runoff. And 2 months are an eternity in politics...

That's patently false. The "expectations" were not he'd win OUTRIGHT. The expectations were a big shoulder shrug and the HOPE was he'd win.

not my impression... look at the previous pages on this thread...
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1378 on: April 18, 2017, 09:17:02 PM »

Its funny thinking of all the outside money and celebrity money that is getting flushed down the toilet.

Republicans spent almost 2x more than Republicans here.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1379 on: April 18, 2017, 09:17:23 PM »

What % of the vote did Clinton get in this district?
46%
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1380 on: April 18, 2017, 09:17:31 PM »

What % of the vote did Clinton get in this district?

46.8%

Points to Ossoff ending at 48% unless Fulton's behavior changes in ways Dekalb's and Cobb's didn't since November.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1381 on: April 18, 2017, 09:17:38 PM »


My posts aren't for others enjoyment.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1382 on: April 18, 2017, 09:18:17 PM »




So, Ossoff ran 1.6% ahead of Clinton in DeKalb. Running 1.5% ahead of her in Cobb with 96% in. Would work out to 48% overall.
https://twitter.com/SeanTrende/status/854517533306736641


The Ossoff party has turned off CNN and is now playing When Doves Cry. In other words, it's a runoff.
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/854519157513216000
Logged
SCNCmod
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1383 on: April 18, 2017, 09:19:09 PM »

It seems like total Dem candidates will have more votes than total Repub candidates... so the runoff should not be a foregone conclusion... at all.
Logged
wjx987
Rookie
**
Posts: 145
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1384 on: April 18, 2017, 09:19:23 PM »

and ? the goal is not to beat trump, the goal is to get 50%+

A goal is to get 50%+. That would have been amazing, and few people projected it here.

If he's scoring at 48 or 49%, that's a very good position to be in heading into the runoff. Better than the low 40s showing in the polls where he'd never make up the gap to 50.



you are right but 2 hours ago, expectations were that ossoff would win without runoff. And 2 months are an eternity in politics...

That's patently false. The "expectations" were not he'd win OUTRIGHT. The expectations were a big shoulder shrug and the HOPE was he'd win.

not my impression... look at the previous pages on this thread...

Yeah that's crazy Atlas expectations being sensational. We are not pundits (thank God). Actual Punditry was far more measured. The last few polls showed Ossoff at 44%. He'll likely do better.
Logged
Lothal1
Rookie
**
Posts: 228
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1385 on: April 18, 2017, 09:19:35 PM »

Its funny thinking of all the outside money and celebrity money that is getting flushed down the toilet.

Republicans spent almost 2x more than Republicans here.
Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,476
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1386 on: April 18, 2017, 09:20:38 PM »

Decision Desk HQ‏Compte certifié @DecisionDeskHQ  39 sil y a 39 secondes
Plus
 Fulton went just over 60% in the early vote to Ossoff, dropped to 55% with some of the precincts reporting. #GA06
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1387 on: April 18, 2017, 09:21:10 PM »


Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

as we know, actors are totally influencing races, only taking the backseat to newspaper endorsements.
Logged
SCNCmod
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1388 on: April 18, 2017, 09:21:17 PM »

If Dem candidates get more votes than total Repub candidates, wouldn't the Dem be favored in a runoff?
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1389 on: April 18, 2017, 09:21:50 PM »

Its funny thinking of all the outside money and celebrity money that is getting flushed down the toilet.

Republicans spent almost 2x more than Republicans here.
Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

The district went about for Romney 20% over Obama in 2012
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1390 on: April 18, 2017, 09:22:26 PM »

Also a lot of GOP posters are assuming all GOP votes will go to Handel (which, might not be true - people could stay home or cast their ballot for Ossoff [far less likely])
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,476
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1391 on: April 18, 2017, 09:22:38 PM »

If Dem candidates get more votes than total Repub candidates, wouldn't the Dem be favored in a runoff?

50/50.. don't forget that some voters are going to die... 2 months it's long...
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1392 on: April 18, 2017, 09:22:41 PM »

Its funny thinking of all the outside money and celebrity money that is getting flushed down the toilet.

Republicans spent almost 2x more than Republicans here.
Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

They did improve significantly from the 2016 House election. Which might be a better thing to compare this race to because it isn't a Presidential race.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1393 on: April 18, 2017, 09:22:43 PM »


Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

as we know, actors are totally influencing races, only taking the backseat to newspaper endorsements.

A district once represented by Newt Gingrich is notoriously seduced by glamour and good looks
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,708
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1394 on: April 18, 2017, 09:22:46 PM »

Its funny thinking of all the outside money and celebrity money that is getting flushed down the toilet.

Republicans spent almost 2x more than Republicans here.
Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

Could still be a good sign if a house race in an off-year have the Dems exceeded the GE %, given how the Dems usually don't show up to polls for non-presidential races.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1395 on: April 18, 2017, 09:22:59 PM »

nate cohn, again, being bullish on ossoff.


I don't know if I noticed when this happened, but Ossoff at 48.7 percent in our estimate--which is a little higher than it has been/was

That's getting in the range where it's worth checking in on the cumulative .8 percent going to non-Ossoff Democrats.
https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/854520087436546050
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1396 on: April 18, 2017, 09:23:08 PM »

Its funny thinking of all the outside money and celebrity money that is getting flushed down the toilet.

Republicans spent almost 2x more than Republicans here.
Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

Sure, but the Republicans still had more outside spending.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,112
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1397 on: April 18, 2017, 09:23:15 PM »

Ossoff winning outright was definitely the preferred outcome, but it definitely wasn't expected and even the Ossoff campaign was prepping it's volunteers for that. As the numbers stand right, he is in a great position for the runoff.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1398 on: April 18, 2017, 09:23:42 PM »


Dems got 8 mil (95% out of district) and every possible liberla hollywood actor/actress to descend on the district and are barely improving from the general election.

as we know, actors are totally influencing races, only taking the backseat to newspaper endorsements.

A district once represented by Newt Gingrich is notoriously seduced by glamour and good looks
Isakson is quite a looker as well.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1399 on: April 18, 2017, 09:23:45 PM »

If Dem candidates get more votes than total Repub candidates, wouldn't the Dem be favored in a runoff?

50/50.. don't forget that some voters are going to die... 2 months it's long...

Do you see Trump's situation improving over the next two months?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 ... 120  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 11 queries.