Conservative Case for Fighting Human-Induced Climate Change
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:31:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Conservative Case for Fighting Human-Induced Climate Change
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Conservative Case for Fighting Human-Induced Climate Change  (Read 1126 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,541
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 08, 2017, 04:20:30 PM »
« edited: February 08, 2017, 04:22:11 PM by Frodo »

A Conservative Case for Climate Action

By MARTIN S. FELDSTEIN, TED HALSTEAD and N. GREGORY MANKIW
FEB. 8, 2017


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2017, 04:32:05 PM »

Yeah, no.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2017, 04:33:48 PM »

I'm not certain that carbon tax is the best approach, but I'll happily support it over the nothing we'll likely see from fake-president Pussygrabber and his American Nazi party.
Logged
(Still) muted by Kalwejt until March 31
Eharding
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,934


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2017, 04:42:57 PM »

Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2017, 04:54:15 PM »

FF plan with a few tweaks.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2017, 08:35:39 PM »

Color me skeptical that putting a 40¢ per gallon tax on gasoline would ever get passed by Congress, especially the current one. (About 20 pounds of CO2 are emitted per gallon of gasoline used, so each dollar per ton of CO2 adds a cent per gallon of gas.) Color me even more skeptical that it would be mostly rebated on a per capita basis.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favor of using a carbon tax the primary method of reducing emissions, but the plan presented here has no chance of getting more than token GOP support. It simply contains far too many betes noires to get Republican support.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2017, 09:02:50 PM »

I'd start by rewriting the nuclear regulatory rules and subsidize the construction of new nuclear plants. That's a much better use of resources than paying lip service to the problem by subsidizing solar and wind. It won't help the coal miners, but it should at least prevent massive cost increases for the rest of American industry.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2017, 09:05:39 PM »

carbon tax would have been a typical conservative idea for a conservative goal.

before the republicans lost their way, imho.

preserving our ecosystem without getting all hyperbole....seems like a good deal.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2017, 09:12:51 PM »

Yeah, I can support this. Carbon taxes make more sense and are more fair than most other form of taxation, IMO. I would also eliminate all current subsides on the oil industry and put that money towards alternative forms of energy, including nuclear.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,381


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2017, 11:39:47 PM »

The conservative case for climate action is that conservatives have to live on this planet too.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,693


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2017, 01:51:40 AM »

I would support a carbon tax if we lowered income taxes by that same percentage
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,349
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2017, 01:55:05 AM »

I'm not certain that carbon tax is the best approach, but I'll happily support it over the nothing we'll likely see from fake-president Pussygrabber and his American Nazi party.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2017, 02:15:22 AM »

Looks good overall, but a citizen's dividend seems really inefficient.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2017, 03:13:32 AM »

The conservative case for climate action is that conservatives have to live on this planet too.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2017, 04:46:29 AM »

Something this simple could be easily sabatoged once started and conservatives would never actually support it. This seems to be the centerpeice of Obamacare for the environment. That is, something that is better than just punting, conservatives will always oppose it and might just cancel it once they are able to.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,475
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 14, 2017, 04:44:48 PM »

Presumably "conservative" isn't synonymous with the fossil-fuel industry so this shouldn't be a problem, right?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 11 queries.