Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2017, 09:08:59 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Torie)
| | |-+  What would have been your prediction a year before each election
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: What would have been your prediction a year before each election  (Read 649 times)
Old School Republican
Computer89
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4973


View Profile
« on: February 13, 2017, 09:53:19 pm »
Ignore

since 1968

Here's Mine

1968:


Romney/Reagan 289
LBJ/Humphrey 249

1972:



Nixon/Agnew 439
Muskie/Jackson 99

1976:



idaho should be blue
Henry Jackson/Birch Bayh 448
Gerald Ford/Nelson Rockerfeller 90


1980:



Reagan/Baker 304
Kennedy/Bayh 234

1984:



Reagan/Bush 363
Mondale/Hart 175


1988:


Gore/Glenn 287
Bush/Dole 251




Bush/Quayle 433
Brown/Gore 105

1996:  Clinton/Gore vs Dole/Voinovich  is too close to call



Missouri decides who wins

2000: Gore/Kerry vs Bush/Ridge is too close to call


Florida decides election

2004: Bush/Cheney over Dean/Gephart



Bush 355
Dean 183

2008: Clinton/Bayh over Guiliani/McCain



Clinton 305
Guiliani 233

2012: Romney/Rubio over Obama/Biden



Romney 292
Obama 246

2016: Rubio/Walker over Hillary/Warren



Rubio 301
Clinton 237
« Last Edit: March 19, 2017, 07:20:55 pm by Old School Republican »Logged

Favorite Current Politician - John Kasich
Favorite of last 50 years- Reagan, Bush Sr

Economic Score: 3.61
Social: -0.1


"http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/grid/28x23.gif

Foreign Policy: 1.6
twenty42
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 75
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2017, 10:10:56 am »
Ignore

2015...Rubio over Clinton
2011...Gingrich over Obama
2007...Romney over Edwards (never thought Clinton was gonna be nominee, and I was right)
2003...Bush over Dean
1999...McCain over Gore
1995...Clinton over generic R
1991...Bush over Harkin
1987...Bush over Cuomo
1983...Reagan over Hart
1979...Reagan over Kennedy
1975...Scoop Jackson over Ford
1971...Nixon over Muskie
1967...LBJ over Nixon
Logged
L.D. Smith
MormDem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9991
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2017, 06:33:13 pm »
Ignore

1951: Eisenhower over Truman    (61-38)
1955: Nixon over Stevenson        (52-46)                   
1959: JFK over Nixon                  (same result)                               
1963: JFK over Goldwater            (72-28)                 
1967: LBJ over Romney               (51-45)
1971: Nixon over Muskie              (51-48)
1975: Church over Ford                (55-44)
1979: Kennedy over Reagan         (49-49)
1983: Reagan over Generic D       (54-44)
1987: Cuomo over Bush Sr           (55-44)
1991: Bush Sr over Generic D       (49-49)
1995: Clinton over Dole               (51-47)
1999: McCain over Gore               (50-48)
2003: Bush Jr over Dean              (51-49)
2007: Clinton over McCain            (same result)
2011: Obama over Romney          (54-44)
2016: Rubio over Clinton              (50-48)
Logged

Political Spectrum

Government: 3.65 (Authoritarian)
Economics: -7.05 (Liberal)
Foreign Policy: -6.66 (Dove)
Culture Wars: -3.1 (Centrist)

Political Compass

Economics: -7.88
Social/Libertarian-Authoritarian: 0.92
Old School Republican
Computer89
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4973


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2017, 07:36:17 pm »
Ignore

1951: Eisenhower over Truman    (61-38)
1955: Nixon over Stevenson        (52-46)                  
1959: JFK over Nixon                  (same result)                                
1963: JFK over Goldwater            (72-28)                  
1967: LBJ over Romney               (51-45)
1971: Nixon over Muskie              (51-48)
1975: Church over Ford                (55-44)
1979: Kennedy over Reagan         (49-49)
1983: Reagan over Generic D       (54-44)
1987: Cuomo over Bush Sr           (55-44)
1991: Bush Sr over Generic D       (49-49)
1995: Clinton over Dole               (51-47)
1999: McCain over Gore               (50-48)
2003: Bush Jr over Dean              (51-49)
2007: Clinton over McCain            (same result)
2011: Obama over Romney          (54-44)
2016: Rubio over Clinton              (50-48)

A few questions

In 1955 Why are assuming IKE steps down and why do u think stevenson would be renominated

In 1979 how do you have Kennedy winning, even if you add Illionis and Oregon from my map to Kennedy , Reagan still has 272 electoral votes, if kennedy wants to win he needs to win Kentucky or Missouri which i dont think he can do

in 1999 wasnt Bush leading McCain in every poll by large margins

in 2007: wasnt McCain losing to Rudy or Mitt in every poll
« Last Edit: March 19, 2017, 08:18:43 pm by Old School Republican »Logged

Favorite Current Politician - John Kasich
Favorite of last 50 years- Reagan, Bush Sr

Economic Score: 3.61
Social: -0.1


"http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/grid/28x23.gif

Foreign Policy: 1.6
mencken
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1573


Political Matrix
E: -8.84, S: -2.87

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2017, 09:15:37 pm »
Ignore

Of elections I was aware enough to prognosticate, I had Clinton beating Romney in 2007, Obama beating Romney in 2011, and Clinton beating Bush or Rubio (depending on how early I am making the prognostication) in 2015.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5418
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: -5.83

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2017, 01:45:32 am »
Ignore

Only doing elections that I at least vaguely remember following:

2004


Dean/Clark - 311
Bush/Cheney - 227

2008


Clinton/Bayh - 361
Giuliani/Huckabee - 177

2012


Obama/Biden - 275
Romney/Portman - 263

2016


Clinton/Heinrich - 346
Rubio/Kasich - 192
Logged

A notorious art thief and prolific womanizer

"I didn't want this job."
- Rex Tillerson

"I didn't seek this job."
- Rex Tillerson

"My wife told me Iím supposed to do this."
- Rex Tillerson
DPKdebator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 509
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 2.26

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2017, 07:33:32 pm »
Ignore

(Only doing 2016 here Tongue) I never really thought about EV matchups that much in 2015, though I predicted Trump and Clinton would win the primaries. At that time, I believed that besides Trump the GOP primary field was a clown show and that Bernie Sanders was a random fringe candidate from nowhere Vermont that would never get anywhere. If I did make a map then, it probably would've looked like this:


Trump - 312 EV
Clinton - 226 EV
Logged

Political Matrix score: Economic +2.58, Social +2.26

Political Typology Quiz: Young Outsider

Political Party Quiz: Views are closest to moderate Republicans

Political Compass score: Economic Left/Right .13, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian .82

Political Spectrum score: Right 1.79, Libertarian 2.26

ISideWith: Trump 100%, Johnson 39%, Clinton 17%, Stein 15%

"Every child in America should be able to play outside without fear." - President Donald J. Trump
Skill and Chance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2950
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2017, 08:45:37 pm »
Ignore

Even assuming you were told the candidates, the only ones in the 20th century that would be anything close to the actual outcome would be 1912 (a Wilson win with <50% would be a given), 1932, 1936, 1964, and 1996.  That leaves 20 out of 25 that weren't really predictable.  I wanted to include 1944 and 1976, but I think most would overstate FDR and Carter's margins predicting those a year in advance.
Logged
Da-Jon
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15952
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2017, 02:50:48 pm »
Ignore



instead of the 272 blue wall, including Iowa;

Cory Booker/Tulsi Gabbard will have 266 electoral votes to use

« Last Edit: March 25, 2017, 02:53:48 pm by Da-Jon »Logged
Old School Republican
Computer89
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4973


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2017, 06:05:59 pm »
Ignore

Even assuming you were told the candidates, the only ones in the 20th century that would be anything close to the actual outcome would be 1912 (a Wilson win with <50% would be a given), 1932, 1936, 1964, and 1996.  That leaves 20 out of 25 that weren't really predictable.  I wanted to include 1944 and 1976, but I think most would overstate FDR and Carter's margins predicting those a year in advance.

Definitly not 1996 , Clinton popularity didnt recover till Newt shutdown the goverment in Dec 95 and Jan of 96.
Logged

Favorite Current Politician - John Kasich
Favorite of last 50 years- Reagan, Bush Sr

Economic Score: 3.61
Social: -0.1


"http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/grid/28x23.gif

Foreign Policy: 1.6
Skill and Chance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2950
View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2017, 02:48:11 pm »
Ignore

Even assuming you were told the candidates, the only ones in the 20th century that would be anything close to the actual outcome would be 1912 (a Wilson win with <50% would be a given), 1932, 1936, 1964, and 1996.  That leaves 20 out of 25 that weren't really predictable.  I wanted to include 1944 and 1976, but I think most would overstate FDR and Carter's margins predicting those a year in advance.

Definitly not 1996 , Clinton popularity didnt recover till Newt shutdown the goverment in Dec 95 and Jan of 96.

OK, great point.  It wasn't until just under a year before that 1996 became obvious.  Then I would sub in 1944, as it was clear the Allies were going to win WWII by late 1943, and if the observer knew that FDR would run again as an incumbent while winning a war, they would obviously predict a substantial.  That being said, I think they would be surprised that he only won by 7.  But there was also going to be some uniform swing away from FDR because the great majority of men in the military could not vote back then, and men were more Dem than women in that era.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines