Primus Inter Pares - A UK Election Series (Master Thread)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:06:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Primus Inter Pares - A UK Election Series (Master Thread)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Primus Inter Pares - A UK Election Series (Master Thread)  (Read 4011 times)
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 20, 2017, 09:35:48 PM »
« edited: April 13, 2017, 05:02:23 PM by Lumine »

Primus Inter Pares:

In a Britain fast approaching the new millenium, how will the political stage develop?

List of British Prime Ministers:

John Major (Conservative Majority): November 1990 - July 1995
Michael Heseltine (Conservative Majority): July 1995 - November 1996
John Prescott (Labour Majority): November 1996 - July 2002
Ken Livingstone (Labour Majority, then Minority): July 2002 - December 2006
Chris Patten (Conservative/Alliance Coalition): December 2006 - December 2011
Andy Burnham (Labour Majority): December 2011 - Unknown

Intro:

Having grown fascinated with British politics over the past few months, I've decided to start one of these interactive TL's, and see how different (or similar) things could be in the span of twenty years or so. Inspired by a thread concerning the potential downfall of John Major in 1995, this TL begins at the Conservative Leadership Election of 1995. In the original race John Major recieved only three more votes than his self-imposed limit for resignation, and in this timeline a bigger number of abstentions and votes for his challenger John Redwood forces Major to resign, creating an open race for the leadership. We will be following the main leadership races of the Labour and Conservatives parties, referendums and general elections, and see how things develop until the present time.

List of Conservative Leaders:

John Major: 1990 - 1995
Michael Heseltine: 1995 - 1997
John Redwood: 1997 - 2001
Ann Widdecombe: 2001 - 2005
Iain Duncan Smith: 2005 - 2006
Chris Patten: 2006 - 2012
Boris Johnson: 2012 - Unknown

List of Labour Leaders:

John Smith: 1992 - 1994
John Prescott: 1994 - 2002
Ken Livingstone: 2002 - 2007
Andy Burnham: 2007 - Unknown

List of Lib Dem Leaders:

Paddy Ashdown: 1988 - 1997
Don Foster: 1997 - 2005
Simon Hughes: 2005 - 2006
Nick Clegg: 2006 - 2012
Ed Davey: 2012 - Unknown

List of New Labour Leaders:

Tony Blair: 2004 - 2012

List of New Deal Leaders:

Robert Kilroy-Silk: 2005 - 2015
Steven Woolfe: 2015 - Unknown

List of Green Leaders:

Siân Berry: 2009 - Unknown

List of Reform Leaders:

David Miliband: 2012 - Unknown
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2017, 11:32:41 PM »
« Edited: February 24, 2017, 11:39:36 PM by Lumine »

Conservative Leadership Election, 1995:

Michael Heseltine, Britain's new Prime Minister

First Ballot:

John Major: 211
John Redwood: 94
Abstentions: 10
Spoilt/No Vote:14

The 1995 Conservative Leadership Election was launched after John Major's decision to confront his Eurosceptic critics head on. Resigning the leadership to the call of "put up, and shut up", a widely expected challenge from former Chancellor Norman Lamont failed to materialize, leaving the Welsh Secretary and ardent Eurosceptic John Redwood to challenge the Prime Minister directly. The first ballot was filled with speculation on whether Redwood could damage Major enough to force his resignation, allowing for a change in leadership in the party and for new candidates to stand on the second. Major won, but having scored less votes than his target of 215 he quit as Prime Minister.

Second Ballot:

Michael Heseltine: 157
John Redwood: 82
Michael Portillo: 71
Gillian Shephard: 20

Many in the party unwilling to accept Redwood as PM, heavyweights Michael Heseltine on the left and Michael Portillo on the right launched their campaigns, followed by dark horse moderate Gillian Shephard. Portillo and Redwood fought hard for the Eurosceptic, Thatcherite vote until a scandal developed in the media as Portillo was outed for his homosexual experiences in university, leading prominent social conservatives from his camp to defect to Redwood. With many MP's turning to Heseltine seeing him as the only electable candidate, Heseltine led in the second ballot, Redwood becoming his main challenger.

Third Ballot:

Michael Heseltine: 225
John Redwood: 104

With Shephard backing Heseltine, it all came down to Portillo's historic decision. Rattled by the personal attacks from former allies and with Redwood resenting Portillo's inability to stand against Major, Portillo decided to cut a deal with Heseltine, securing the Treasury and some key policy consessions from his rival, ambitious enough for the crown to be willing to negotiate. The deal damaged Portillo among Eurosceptics but allowed many MP's in the right to find Heseltine acceptable enough, allowing him to trounce Redwood in the final ballot. After two decades of yearning the leadership and Downing Street 10, Michael Heseltine has finally become Prime Minister. Can he turn the Conservative Party around?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2017, 12:39:39 PM »
« Edited: February 25, 2017, 03:22:19 PM by Lumine »

Labour Leadership Election, 1994:

John Prescott, Labour's new champion

First Preference:

Leader:
John Prescott: 35,9%
Tony Blair: 30,8%
Gordon Brown: 23,1%
Margaret Beckett: 10,2%

Deputy Leader:
Margaret Beckett: 55,9%
John Prescott: 44,1%

The 1994 Labour Leadership Election came about due to the sudden and unexpected death of Labour Leader John Smith, stunning the party and the nation as Smith was widely believed to be Britain's next Prime Minister. With John Prescott and Margaret Beckett waving the banner of the soft-left while also battling for Deputy Leader, the modernizing wing failed to make a united stand after Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both insisted in launching their own campaigns, splitting their faction and poisoning their previously strong relationship. With Brown and Blair locked in civil war Prescott led in the first ballot, while Beckett captured the Deputy Leadership.

Final Preference:

Leader:
John Prescott: 60.7%
Tony Blair: 39,3%

With Beckett endorsing Prescott his campaign turned into the frontrunner for the leadership, despite heavy media and polling backing for Blair. The exact role of Gordon Brown has been shrouded in mystery as Brown half-heartedly endorsed Blair, yet many of his supporters appear to have turned towards Prescott rather than Blair, who during the contest was percieved to have gone too far on his proposals for modernization and taking the Labour Party deep into the center. As a result, Prescott won a resounding mandate to halt modernization and take Labour into a more leftist stance once again. The shockwaves were felt early as Prescott reassembled the entire leadership team following the Shadow Cabinet elections, demoting Blair, Brown and Jack Cunningham to form a team of his own trust:

Labour Leader: John Prescott
Deputy Labour Leader: Margaret Beckett
Shadow Chancellor: Robin Cook
Shadow Home Secretary: Frank Dobson
Shadow Foreign Secretary: George Robertson

But with a growing rift in the party between modernizers and Prescott loyalists, could John Prescott finally take Labour into Government?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2017, 12:46:57 PM »

The Heseltine Ministry (1995-1996)Sad


Prime Minister: Michael Heseltine
Deputy Prime Minister: Michael Howard
Foreign Secretary: Kenneth Clarke
Chancellor of the Exchequer: Michael Portillo
Home Secretary: Gillian Shephard

Michael Heseltine entered Downing Street 10 as the result of an unholy alliance within his party, many of his usual critics seconding his bid for the leadership out of the belief that Heseltine was the one man who spare the Conservative Party from a full-scale disaster in the next election. And despite his strongly Europhile views, Heseltine had decided to compromise with Portillo to attempt to unite the party before the election. Portillo became Chancellor as fellow Eurosceptic Michael Howard was kicked upstairs to become Deputy Prime Minister as a signal of unity, Ken Clarke was moved to the Foreign Office and Shephard, having put down a marker despite a less than ideal performance, became the Home Secretary.

Heseltine, therefore, got on the business to trying to steer his party into success and the country into trusting the Conservative Party again, with mixed results [1]. His biggest break came due to the election of John Prescott as Labour Leader, as despite Prescott’s populist appear it didn’t take long for Prescott and his supporters to enter a full-scale civil war with Tony Blair and the modernizers, who feared Labour was turning too far into the left under the new Leader. Indeed, Heseltine often bested Prescott in PMQ’s (leading to several memorable sketches in the revived satiric show Spitting Image) and made much of the Labour Party’s return into socialism to portray that they weren’t to be trusted. Polling for the Conservatives steadily improved, despite Prescott still holding a large lead.

On actual policy performance, the Conservatives also found a degree of renewal and success with the new Prime Minister. Having inherited an increasingly steady economy by Ken Clarke, Chancellor Portillo took the chance to significantly lower taxes in the 1996 Budget, attempting to do his best to deliver on past promises of lower taxation as inflation went down and employment was reasonable contained within a 6% range. In domestic term, Heseltine led a personal charge for efficiency in government, establishing several new committees in cabinet with the target of reducing unnecessary bureaucracy in Whitehall while promoting several schemes to improve services in the National Health Service and improve the competitivity of British industries (the noteworthy failure being that of British Rail, whose privatization has been poorly handled). In foreign policy Clarke secured successes as well, charting a steady course with China over the imminent Hong Kong handover and finding growing consensus inside Europe.

But two issues made governing immensely difficult for Heseltine.

On the first front was the “sleaze” problem, which wouldn’t let the Conservatives go. Even as Heseltine did his best to avoid promoting ministers involved in scandals (outside of a few close allies) stories of Tory MP’s involved in sexual and financial scandals continue to appear periodically in the press, leading to much ridicule and scorn. Of a much serious note was the appearance of the so called Scott Report on arms sales to Iraq during the late 1980’s by the Conservative Government back then, the one major success of the opposition as Shadow Foreign Secretary George Robertson inflicted heavy damage on the government as the issue became more publicised.

The worst problem by far was, however, backbench discipline. John Redwood’s refusal to serve in a Heseltine-led Cabinet signalled that infighting was not to end, leading to constant battles and rebellions against Heseltine’s European policy in a manner resembling of Major. Heseltine was, on one side, to prevent a few MP’s from defecting to Labour and the Lib Dems and therefore able to save the dwindling Tory majority, yet the constant attacks by the Eurosceptic backbenchers despite the official support of Howard and Portillo by the Prime Minister became harder and harder to control.

By the end of 1996 and after a year in office Heseltine faced the critical strategic decision: he could wait until May 1997 for the economy to continue its recovery but face his backbenchers bringing down the government, or he could call an early election in the hope of a shock Conservative victory despite unencouraging polls. Against the objections of Clarke, Shephard and Howard, Heseltine and Portillo agreed to take the gamble, calling a General Election by November 1996. With a somewhat successful 16 months in office and moderately popular, Heseltine hopes to bank on a growing economy and the change of leadership to take the Conservatives into their fifth straight victory.
_________________________________________________________________

[1] The performance of each Prime Minister is to be determined via dice roll on seven different categories that measure different aspects of performance.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2017, 03:09:15 PM »

This is awesome! Jimmy Goldsmith for Downing Street (or wherever the Deputy PM would reside if there is an official residence).
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2017, 10:35:36 PM »

Can't Trashbin the Heseltine. Tongue
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2017, 03:38:08 PM »

November 1996 General Election:


November 1996 - Heseltine and Prescott fight the battle of their lives

Labour Party: 47% (426 MP's)
Conservative Party: 33.4% (185 MP's)
Liberal Democrats: 10.6% (19 MP's)
Others: 9% (29 MP's)

The campaign started on a good note for the Conservatives, Heseltine taking the Opposition by surprise by launching an early election. Running on a moderate yet modernizing manifesto Heseltine was particularly successful in taking advantage of Paddy Ashdown's left-turn for the Lib Dems, preventing key defections from voters into the Lib Dem camp. Yet by the second week Labour was fully adapted and prepared for battle, and John Prescott took the fight to the Conservatives with a fiery disposition and a burning desire for victory. Despite having neared 40% in the initial polls, Heseltine would soon see his numbers go down.

In retrospect, most political experts agree too many factors were against the Tories for Heseltine to overcome them all. Despite a strong economy and a change in government, the division of the party over Europe was as plain as ever, many MP's still defying Heseltine in the middle of the campaign. That had to be combined with the memory for Black Wednesday, the internal injuries of Major's resignation, the steady stream of "sleaze" scandals from MP's such as Neil Hamilton and, more important than anything, that the electorate was not inclined to give the Conservatives the benefit of the doubt after seventeen years in government. To make matters worse, the Referendum Party of Sir James Goldsmith captured about 3% of the vote despite poor organization, costing the Conservatives as much as twenty seats.

Labour didn't had a slick media operation (as Prescott refused to hand the campaign to modernizers like Peter Mandelson), but it compensated with a deep sense of Conservative fatigue, a strong and clear message (if significantly to the left) and above all, the charisma and appeal of John Prescott. Widely mocked by the Conservatives due to his confusing sentences, lack of syntaxis and his rough manners, his attitude was well received and even embraced as fresh by the voters, in deep desire for something new [1]. Compared to the sheer energy behind Labour, the Liberal Democrats failed to make a serious impact in the polls and the public debate, sinking rapidly.

The night was a hard one for the Conservatives as seat after seat fell to Labour, although Heseltine's approach and campaign strategy was believed to have saved at least a couple dozen seats from capture by the Lib Dems. Several government ministers like Ian Lang, Edwina Currie, Malcolm Rifkind and Michael Forsyth fell, but the toughest blow was when Chancellor of the Exchequer Michael Portillo lost his seat to Labour. The Lib Dems faced a gloomy night as well, with a net gain of 1 MP (losing several seats won in by-elections), the loss of almost half their voteshare and the fall of key MP's to Labour in Simon Hughes, Robert Maclennan, Vince Cable and particularly Charles Kennedy.

Speaking with beaming confidence and joy, John Prescott declared a new dawn for Britain to end almost two decades of Conservative governments. On their own side, Michael Heseltine and Paddy Ashdown decided to stay on for a few months to stabilize their parties, and then hold a leadership election.
_________________________________________

[1] In this case, Prescott being a sort of Boris Johnson in terms of appeal.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2017, 06:25:56 PM »

I remember watching newsnight coverage of the 1994 election, and a lot of people at first liked Prescott- saw him as trustworthy, honest etc. His biggest problem is that imo Labour Prime Ministers only survive if they're good at well jumping around the ideological spectrum (aka Harold Wilson/Blair) Prescott certainly has a bit of Harry Perkins to him

Prescott certainly poses an interesting Dilemma; as the economic growth inherited means that Labour will do relatively well
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2017, 09:18:43 PM »

A map of the election would be great. Smiley
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2017, 03:50:00 PM »

Lib Dem Leadership Election, 1997:

Don Foster, the Lib Dems's new hope

Only Round:

Don Foster: 53,6%
David Rendel: 32,1%
Menzies Campbell: 14.3%

Afer a disappointing performance in the 1996 General Election and the widespread loss of many voters, Lib Dem Paddy Ashdown resigned. The party appeared to be a crossroads, lacking a clear sense of purpose while also needing to score gains at the next election to appear a truly viable option. With the defeat of MP's such as Charles Kennedy preventing them to enter the contest (and with candidates likes Malcolm Bruce finding little support), the race was envisioned to be one in which heavyweight Menzies "Ming" Campbell would fight the lesser known challengers Don Foster (from the left) and David Rendel (from the right). That this didn't happen was in large part due to concerns over Campbell's age and health, as his claims of being fit for the leadership appeared hollow following a series of serious health-scares through the campaign.

His efforts collapsing due to these concerns and a badly run campaign, the contest turned into a battle on whether to take the Lib Dems back to the center, as Rendel argued, or further into the left, option which Foster embraced. Despite Rendel's continued criticisms of the Prescott government the contest was believed to be civil, and it ended with Foster securing a convincing majority on the first round while Rendel, to his solace, found a strong base of support. Humilliated by his poor result Campbell retired from the frontbench, despite remaining an MP. Whereas John Prescott was adamant in shutting down talk of a Lib-Lab coalition (to the disappointment of Tony Blair and others), Foster nonetheless would do his best to turn the Lib Dems into a progressive left party over the next four years. It would remain to be seen whether it would help the party or not.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2017, 04:09:33 PM »

Conservative Leadership Election, 1997:

John Redwood, the Eurosceptic champion

First Ballot:

Ken Clarke: 81
John Redwood: 65
Michael Howard: 16
Stephen Dorrell: 15
Gillian Shephard: 8

Hampered by health issues and the election defeat, soon Michael Heseltine had to concede that leading the party was no longer possible for him, and so a leadership election was called for June 1997. With important contenders like Portillo, Rifkind, Patten and Lang out of the race due to no longer being MPs, the race was broadly believed to be battle of the left and right under Ken Clarke and John Redwood, with Michael Howard, Gillian Shephard and Stephen Dorrell launching bids of their own in an attempt to dethrone the frontrunners. Neither Dorrell nor Shephard managed to make a huge impact on their own, and while Howard presented a relevant challenge to Redwood in the right his bid was soon destroyed by a blistering attack by his former subordinate Ann Widdecombe on the media, stating among other things that Howard had "something of the night" about him.

Second Ballot:

John Redwood: 114
Ken Clarke: 71

The race therefore turned into a Clarke-Redwood contest, many giving the advantage to Clarke due to Dorrell's endorsement and his strong support in the constituency associations. That Redwood managed to win the contest after a hard fought campaign was believed to be an upset, and one most people blamed on the poor nature of the Clarke campaign in the second round. First because due to his confidence in victory Clarke did not temper his pro-Europe views, even making positive statements about the Euro that turned many moderates against his bid. The feeling was further enforced when it emerged that Clarke and William Hague (Howard's running mate) were discovered to be planning a pact between the Europhiles and Hague's minor faction, which many derided as throughly cynical and opportunistic. With Lady Thatcher herself doing everything possible to sink Clarke and promote Redwood, Clarke's fate was finally sealed with an unexpected defeat. Finally, the Thatcherites had gotten their man in.

After Clarke's refusal to join the shadow cabinet, Redwood took the bold step of allowing many party heavyweights to retire, promoting several of his rivals and the younger MP's in the party to his Shadow Cabinet:

Conservative Leader: John Redwood
Deputy Leader: Gillian Shephard
Shadow Chancellor: Peter Lilley
Shadow Home Secretary: Francis Maude
Shadow Foreign Secretary: Michael Howard

And yet, could the divisive Redwood prevent a split in the Conservative Party?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2017, 04:41:20 PM »

The Prescott Ministry (1996-2000)Sad


Prime Minister: John Prescott
Deputy Prime Minister: Margaret Beckett
Foreign Secretary: George Robertson, then Clare Short
Chancellor of the Exchequer: Robin Cook
Home Secretary: Frank Dobson

Backed by the strongest mandate in decades John Prescott entered Downing 10 Street as the first Labour Prime Minister since James Callaghan, having taken Labour back into the soft left following the efforts of Kinnock and Smith. Taking on virtually the same cabinet as his Shadow Cabinet (with exceptions like Tony Blair, who was sacked over his opposition to nationalization and George Roberson, replaced as Foreign Secretary after being chosen as NATO Secretary General), Prescott onto the business of delivering on his large scale proposals for Britain, resulting in a controversial (if popular with the electoral) tenure as Prime Minister.

The largest success of the Labour government is believed to be economic performance, as the current government inherited a strong economy which Chancellor Robin Cook has handled with skill, keeping spending moderate in 1997 before engaging in large-scale raises in public-spending in 1998, 1999 and 2000 which so far appear to have had a positive effect in investment and public services. Similarly, the government has also steered clear of most political scandals beyond inquiries on a couple of MP's like Peter Mandelson, and a few controversies over Prime Minister's Prescott fondness for expensive Jaguar cars, leading to Prescott being personally popular with the electorate due to his bluntness and perceived honest, a popularity which however hasn't extended to much of the Labour Party.

Of a more mixed nature was foreign policy. On the successful side, Prescott and his Foreign Secretaries Robertson and Short led acclaimed humanitarian interventions in Kosovo and particularly in Sierra Leone, where Short and Prescott are held in great esteemed after restoring a sense of stability in the country. On the more questionable side, a lack of coherence in both European policy and stances in Northern Ireland have proved a serious headache to the government, as the civil war over Europe that plagued the Conservative Party now takes place as well inside Labour, with the modernizing rebels defending entry into the Euro. To make matters more complicated, the Northern Ireland peace process has stalled due to the Unionists being distrustful of Prescott's approach and stances.

But what became the most controversial side of the Prescott government was, ironically, domestic policy. After a few first victories on devolution for a Scottish Parliament and a Mayor of London, the ambitious devolution agenda stalled after a shocking defeat in the referendum for a Welsh parliament. Similarly, Prescott's commitment to nationalization and the repeal of trade union legislation has strongly backfired, with several nationalized companies (water, rail and so on) proving unprofitable and incapable of improving public services in the way that was expected. Furthermore, the large-scale repeal of trade union laws under Margaret Beckett has empowered the unions to allow them to stage several successful strikes over 1999 and 2000, playing hard with the government and reminding people of the 70's under Wilson and Callaghan.

Governing has been made difficult by the ongoing rift inside Labour, as the modernizer faction has become more and more rebel over issues like nationalization and Europe. Led by Tony Blair (famously sacked by Prescott over nationalization), the rebels have often stalled some of Prescott's more leftist initiatives, aided by the fact that even with Prescott's immense majority a large part of the parliamentary party is formed by modernizers (although the Gordon Brown faction has continued to support the Prime Minister on most issues). With Don Foster's proposals for joint collaboration turned down the Lib Dems have turned more hostile, and despite the divisions inside the Conservatives John Redwood as proved a competent opposition leader, bringing disappointed eurosceptics back to the Tory fold while plans for a rebel Pro-Euro Conservative Party have failed after Heseltine and Clarke refused to support it.

Increasingly tired of the struggles over domestic policy and after almost four years in office Prescott has called another election to regain a mandate to push forward. It remains to be seen whether he can replicate his majority from 1996.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2017, 10:26:03 AM »

October 2000 General Election:


October 2000 - Prescott sails into a second victory

Labour Party: 40.9% (407 MP's)
Conservative Party: 33.6% (183 MP's)
Liberal Democrats: 16.5% (42 MP's)
Others: 9% (27 MP's)

The 2000 Campaign started in one of the oddest notes of any General Election, as while Prime Minister John Prescott was touring a marginal seat a protester threw an egg against him. Prescott quickly punched him, and the incident completely overshadowed the launch of the Labour manifesto. Seeing a chance for both of them, Redwood and Foster attempted to seize the agenda and did so for the first week of the campaign before Prescott apologized and returned to the warpath. Whatever doubts the incident created about his character, his personal popularity allowed him to ride out the storm despite Labour losing points in the polls.

Just how vulnerable Labour was or not became a moot point, though, as while Redwood's extremely right-wing manifesto closed his right flank and drew the Eurosceptic parties to near extinction in the popular vote, his stances turned off the political center which Heseltine had so carefully tried to court in 96', voters which soon found another appealing alternative in the Lib Dems despite their sharp turn towards the left. Indeed, Foster proved a highly effective leader on account of his enthusiasm and public appearances, recovering the lost ground from 1992 and targeting several seats he saw as winnable. Against this backdrop, all the inroads Redwood made against the Labour vote ended up quickly cancelled by all the votes lost to the Liberal Democrats.

Despite the ongoing mess on domestic policy issues the economy remained strong, the Prime Minister was personally popular and the Opposition considered too extreme to win, factors which combined to produce another clear victory for John Prescott. Labour lost almost 20 seats and over 6%, but remained above 400 votes and retained an unassailable majority. The Lib Dems finally made a breakthrough by winning over 6%, doubling their share of MP's and securing the return of MP's defeated in 1996 like Charles Kennedy, Vince Cable and Simon Hughes. The Conservatives had the most bitter night, barely winning votes overall and with a net loss of 2 seats. As John Prescott returned to Downing Street 10 amidst the cheer of the crowds and Don Foster celebrated an excellent result with his party, John Redwood promptly resigned. It was time for the third Conservative leadership election in five years.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2017, 11:43:42 AM »
« Edited: March 08, 2017, 11:46:44 AM by MAINEiac4434 »

Are there any changes in the cabinet?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2017, 11:48:09 AM »

Are there any changes in the cabinet?

We'll get to that after the write-up of the Prescott II cabinet, but there should be a few.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2017, 06:15:11 PM »

Will there be maps?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2017, 06:45:21 PM »


How could there be maps? (Honest question)
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2017, 08:40:08 PM »

I know that there are maps out there of what seats are being held by which party
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2017, 08:47:25 PM »

I know that there are maps out there of what seats are being held by which party

Oh, those!

Sorry, no way, I don't have the time to make a map that accounts for 658 seats.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2017, 09:13:01 PM »

I know that there are maps out there of what seats are being held by which party

Oh, those!

Sorry, no way, I don't have the time to make a map that accounts for 658 seats.
If you could give me the template and an idea of what areas would swing I'd be happy to do it for you Smiley
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2017, 11:05:49 AM »
« Edited: March 12, 2017, 06:33:42 PM by Lumine »

The Prescott II Ministry (2000-2002)Sad


Prime Minister: John Prescott
Deputy Prime Minister: Margaret Beckett
Foreign Secretary: Clare Short
Chancellor of the Exchequer: Robin Cook
Home Secretary: Mo Mowlam

Despite the difficulties of a controversial tenure John Prescott was returned as Prime Minister with a large majority, even if Labour had lost a substantial number of votes from 1996. Prescott extensively reshuffled the cabinet while retaining most of the holders of the great offices of state, with noteworthy additions such as Mo Mowlam as Home Secretary (as a olive branch to the modernizers) and the return of Gordon Brown to the backbenches. Determined not to get bogged down on his agenda like the past term, Prescott made it an immediate priority to deliver on his two pet proposals: Lords Reform and a devolution experiment in Northern England. To Prescott’s disappointment English voters turned down a local parliament in a 2001 referendum, but with the support of the Liberal Democrats the House of Lords was finally reformed. While unable to get rid of the Lords altogether, Prescott secured a plurality of the Lords elected via PR under party lists for each general election.

Thankfully, Labour managed to reduce their constant infighting in order to focus on governing, and continued to avoid major scandals affecting the cabinet outside of Prescott’s outbursts and gaffes. But despite the triumph of delivering on Lords Reform the domestic front for the Prescott Ministry continued to be filled with challenge and failures at implementing policy, the nationalized industries continuing to represent a major financial drain, public services failing to take off and immigration taking a large role in public debate as the government was unable to reduce the increasing influx of migrants into the United Kingdom. The economy, while still healthy was losing the effects of its earlier boom, leading Cook to continue to drive spending up in order to compensate.

Initially with few objectives beyond securing peace in Northern Ireland (with Clare Short obtaining a ceasefire in early 2002) on the foreign stage, the Prescott government had to face an ever-changing world due to the impact of the 9/11 attacks in the United States (with one of the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol hit by planes), which led US President John McCain to pursue a global strategy to hunt down the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda and their leader Osama Bin Laden. Through the remainder of 2001 and early 2002 Prescott gave his full support to McCain, seconding his decision to launch a full-scale invasion of Afghanistan that has seen the collapse of the Taliban regime as fighting spreads across the entire country. But with Bin Laden still on the run, McCain has decided to go further, devising a global strategy to combat Al-Qaeda and supporting regimes (or areas they control) which has targeted the al-Turabi regime in Sudan, Yemen, Somalia, and possibly Syria or Iraq for targets, something that has drawn scepticism from Prime Minister Prescott and Foreign Secretary Short.

To many it seemed Prescott would be forced to spend the next couple of years dealing with the fall-out of 9/11, until a bombshell was dropped in May 2002. Several tabloids ran a story (later confirmed) of Prescott having had several affairs in the past and a current one with one of his secretaries in Downing Street. Defiant at first and determined to fight, Prescott was successively worn down by criticism inside his party, attacks from the media and crucially, the steadfast refusal of his wife to support him after learning the truth. His position became increasingly untenable due to the pressure and particularly for several devastating defeats on PMQ’s, with the Conservatives delivering blow after blow to Prescott’s credibility. In the end, many in the cabinet advised him to step down, and Prescott finally conceded. Deeply shaken, Prescott emerged out of Downing Street 10 on June 2002 and announced his resignation, staying as a caretaker until Labour chose its new leader (and the new Prime Minister) in July 2002.

After more than five and a half years in office (one more than John Major), the Prescott Ministry was over.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2017, 06:19:10 PM »

This is one of my favorite parts of Atlas right now.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2017, 06:21:58 PM »

This is one of my favorite parts of Atlas right now.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2017, 06:32:31 PM »


Thank you, gentlemen!

If you could give me the template and an idea of what areas would swing I'd be happy to do it for you Smiley

Excellent!

Here are the full 1996 results: (with Bury St Edmunds, Colchester and Lichfield added as Conservative due to the margin)

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi-bin/usercode.py?CON=33.4&LAB=47&LIB=10.6&UKIP=&Green=&NewLAB=&TVCON=&TVLAB=&TVLIB=&TVUKIP=&TVGreen=&SCOTCON=&SCOTLAB=&SCOTLIB=&SCOTUKIP=&SCOTGreen=&SCOTNAT=&display=AllMajoritySorted&regorseat=%28none%29&boundary=1997

And here is 2000:

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi-bin/usercode.py?CON=33.6&LAB=40.9&LIB=16.5&UKIP=&Green=&NewLAB=&TVCON=&TVLAB=&TVLIB=&TVUKIP=&TVGreen=&SCOTCON=&SCOTLAB=&SCOTLIB=&SCOTUKIP=&SCOTGreen=&SCOTNAT=&display=AllMajoritySorted&regorseat=%28none%29&boundary=2001ob
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 14, 2017, 03:34:44 PM »

Conservative Leadership Election, 2001:

Ann Widdecombe, the Tories's Fighting Lady

First Ballot:

Ann Widdecombe: 58
Ken Clarke: 37
David Davis: 29
Francis Maude: 22
Peter Lilley: 22
Stephen Dorrell: 15

Having scored a disappointing performance in the 2000 General Election John Redwood resigned as Leader of the Conservative Party, starting the third leadership election in six years. With Michael Portillo and Chris Patten declining to return as MP’s and Malcolm Rifkind failing to retake a seat the contest saw six candidates fighting for the leadership: Ann Widdecombe, Ken Clarke, David Davis, Francis Maude, Peter Lilley and Stephen Dorrell (with potential candidates like William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith staying out). Despite speculation focusing on Clarke, Maude and Lilley as the main candidates, neither Maude nor Lilley managed to find success despite being considered the champions of their respective factions and the heirs to either Redwood and Portillo. Added with the inability of Dorrell to make grounds beyond his small base of MP’s all three were eliminated or withdrew after the first ballot. With Ken Clarke standing strong and the dark-horse David Davis surging as a clear option, it fell to Ann Widdecombe to emerge ahead of the divided field.

Second Ballot Results:

Ken Clarke: 78
Ann Widdecombe: 56
David Davis: 49

Turned into a three-way contest between Clarke, Widdecombe and Davis the contest turned towards the two candidates chosen for the membership ballot. It was Ken Clarke who proved more successful courting MP’s, bringing Dorrell and even Maude on board to form a larger coalition to take the leadership. Widdecombe, losing some ground on account of a few questionable media interventions, saw Davis rising behind her as the other notable Eurosceptic candidate on the race. With Clarke winning a large plurality of MP’s in the second round, Widdecombe edged Davis by seven votes to reach the final membership ballot.

Membership Ballot Results:

Ann Widdecombe: 54.2%
Ken Clarke: 45.8%

The final ballot was positively described as a “clash of the titans”. Widdecombe and Clarke both had enormous support amongst the membership, and quite possibly the two more popular MP’s in the party. Despite the clear policy differences (contrasting the social-conservative, Eurosceptic, authoritarian Widdecombe with the social-liberal, Europhile, and more relaxed Clarke), it was a mostly civil contest, supported by Clarke and Widdecombe’s positive personal relationship. Whilst both rejected the idea of serving in the Shadow Cabinet should they be defeated, they also did the best they could to prevent another civil war from taking place should either be elected. In the end, it was Widdecombe who proved to be more in tune with the feelings of the party membership, and despite a close result she defeated Clarke to take the leadership. Widdecombe moved to heal the wounds of the contest as soon as possible, assembling a Shadow Cabinet that represented different factions:

Conservative Leader: Ann Widdecombe
Deputy Leader: Stephen Dorrell
Shadow Chancellor: Oliver Letwin
Shadow Home Secretary: David Davis
Shadow Foreign Secretary: William Hague

Ann Widdecombe had taken her party by storm, could she do the same with the nation?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.241 seconds with 11 queries.