If Warren doesn't run?

[Hindsight was 2020]

If somehow Warren doesn't run due to health/scandal/or whatever, who would be the favorite to win the democratic nominee?

[Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas]

None of the above. It'll be whoever takes up the progressive mantle most effectively and likely gets the endorsements of Sanders and Warren. Harris is the odds-on favorite right now, although Baldwin or Ellison could be lesser-known candidates depending on where the mood of the party is at the moment.

Watch Cuban spend 500M of his own money and swamp the field, though.

[Former Senator Haslam2020]

None of the above. It'll be whoever takes up the progressive mantle most effectively and likely gets the endorsements of Sanders and Warren. Harris is the odds-on favorite right now, although Baldwin or Ellison could be lesser-known candidates depending on where the mood of the party is at the moment.

Watch Cuban spend 500M of his own money and swamp the field, though.

Cuban or Brown imho, maybe Steyer if Cuban doesn't enter.

[Confused Democrat]

Out of these choices?

Probably Klobuchar.

[BaldEagle1991]

Cory Booker is likely the person.

Julian Castro is another wild card.

If it's anyone else I'd be surprised.

[Cynthia]

SHERROD BROWN

[Sir Mohamed]

Out of these ones: Probably Booker. In the end, it could be a Booker/Bullock ticket. I would be fine with it.

[Coolface Sock #42069]

I really don't think Mark Cuban is liberal enough to win a Democratic nomination, though my inner Sharknado fan would love to see him as president.

[Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas]

I really don't think Mark Cuban is liberal enough to win a Democratic nomination, though my inner Sharknado fan would love to see him as president.

I wouldn't have thought thrice-married Clinton-donatng wrestling star Donald Trump was conservative enough to win the GOP nomination either.

Weird things happen when celebrities with bottomless money pits and universal name-recognition decide to run.

Although he probably needs to hope for the candidates not to unite behind one candidate early to have a shot.

[Wiz in Wis]

Seriously? Enough with the Tulsi Gabbard nonsense.

[politics_king]

Seriously? Enough with the Tulsi Gabbard nonsense.

I'd vote for her.

[Crumpets]

I'm still giving Biden a better than 50/50 shot of getting in. And if he does, in a Warren-less field, he'd probably be about has formidable a candidate as Hillary when she first got in.

[America Needs R'hllor]

I'd say that out of these, Booker would be favoured, but I think it would be someone else.

[Liberalrocks]

Hillary

[Wiz in Wis]

Seriously? Enough with the Tulsi Gabbard nonsense.

I'd vote for her.

Why? What has she accomplished, aside from cozying up with Bashar al-Assad and saying mean things about DWS? She's a two term congresswoman from Hawaii. Even Barack Obama had more policy and political experience, and he wasn't palling around with foreign dictators.