Schechter v US and Wickard v Filburn
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 07:51:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Schechter v US and Wickard v Filburn		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Schechter v US and Wickard v Filburn  (Read 478 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,703
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 27, 2017, 06:08:02 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.L.A._Schechter_Poultry_Corp._v._United_States 1935
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn 1942

Are these two Commerce Clause cases consistent by any logic?  Why did Harlan Stone and Owen Roberts join the unanimous ruling against the government in the first, and the unanimous ruling for the government in the second?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.