What Atlas #Analysis will be rejected after the 2020 election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 12:27:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  What Atlas #Analysis will be rejected after the 2020 election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What Atlas #Analysis will be rejected after the 2020 election?  (Read 4644 times)
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« on: March 01, 2017, 12:35:10 PM »

We now see that much Atlas #analysis of the 2016 election was wrong or is now seen to be wrong. I am sure that much of what we think about the 2020 election will be proven wrong? Which pieces of current conventional wisdom on this forum do you view as ridiculous and wrong? What do you think will be proven wrong after the 2020 election? Discuss!

There will be plenty of posters predicting a 1932/1980ish repudiation of Trump, who will then be promptly disappointed and disenchanted when both major party candidates receive at least 45% of the popular vote.
Logged
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2017, 12:49:18 AM »

To make a meta-analysis here, the notion that presidential elections are predictable, scientific events is rather laughable. 2020 may be another 1932, and it may be another 1984. Both seem extremely unlikely at this point, but it really all depends on Trump's first term.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.