Second most powerful Communist Nation during the Cold War?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:55:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Second most powerful Communist Nation during the Cold War?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Number 2?
#1
East Germany
 
#2
Czechoslovakia
 
#3
Poland
 
#4
Yugoslavia
 
#5
Romania
 
#6
China
 
#7
North Korea
 
#8
Vietnam
 
#9
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: Second most powerful Communist Nation during the Cold War?  (Read 1925 times)
JasonDebenah89
Rookie
**
Posts: 130
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 04, 2017, 07:56:29 PM »

Which Communist country in your opinion was the second most powerful in the Cold War after the Soviet Union?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2017, 08:09:19 PM »

Albania (sane)
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2017, 10:04:32 PM »

would be needed to define "power", otherwise china.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2017, 01:38:11 PM »

What an odd question to ask. In any event East Germany, Czecho and Poland were all puppet states and Romania was mostly one, so I'm struggling to understand why you would include them.
Logged
SoLongAtlas
VirginiaModerate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,219
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2017, 08:00:02 PM »

PRC
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,056
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2017, 09:08:58 PM »

This poll would have been more interesting if you were looking for #3, and excluded both the Soviets and Chinese.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,728


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2017, 09:20:23 PM »

Yugoslavia is 3rd.
Logged
Axel Foley
Rookie
**
Posts: 127


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2017, 09:42:17 PM »

Titoist Yugoslavia had an enormous prestige.

CRVENA ZVEZDA!
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2017, 10:33:49 PM »

Calling Yugoslavia "Communist" is like calling India "NATO-aligned" in that it overestimates and simplifies the truth.
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2017, 02:42:34 AM »

East Germany maybe for #3? By the 1970's and 1980's the East German's had by far the highest GDP per capita in the Eastern Bloc. Putin said he was jealous of the East German abundance of jeans and other consumer goods compared to the USSR, when he was stationed there as a KGB agent in the 1980's.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2017, 06:59:18 AM »

One could argue that the Soviet Union was. After all the People's Republic of China was willing to engage the west directly in Korea and without Mao's support it's doubtful that Hồ could have succeeded in Vietnam.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2017, 12:35:22 PM »

East Germany maybe for #3? By the 1970's and 1980's the East German's had by far the highest GDP per capita in the Eastern Bloc. Putin said he was jealous of the East German abundance of jeans and other consumer goods compared to the USSR, when he was stationed there as a KGB agent in the 1980's.

Heh, we used to make comparisions between Poland and East Germany: they have more luxury goods, but far less freedom (People's Republic of Poland was perhaps the least represive regime after 1956).
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2017, 03:01:24 PM »

Calling Yugoslavia "Communist" is like calling India "NATO-aligned" in that it overestimates and simplifies the truth.

Not exactly, Yugoslavia claimed to be Communist, just like China does today when it's very capitalist.  Calling Yugoslavia "Warsaw Pact-aligned" would be the equivalent to calling India "NATO-aligned."
Logged
Murica!
whyshouldigiveyoumyname?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,295
Angola


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 16, 2017, 07:37:27 PM »

Calling Yugoslavia "Communist" is like calling India "NATO-aligned" in that it overestimates and simplifies the truth.
So the nation which had a literal socialist economy was the least socialist*?

*I refuse to use the word Communist in relation to any nation state
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2017, 07:40:40 AM »

Calling Yugoslavia "Communist" is like calling India "NATO-aligned" in that it overestimates and simplifies the truth.

Not exactly, Yugoslavia claimed to be Communist, just like China does today when it's very capitalist.  Calling Yugoslavia "Warsaw Pact-aligned" would be the equivalent to calling India "NATO-aligned."
or the PRC " very capitalist".  "capitalist" govts don't control all the banks and important industries in a country.
Logged
Murica!
whyshouldigiveyoumyname?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,295
Angola


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2017, 10:38:25 AM »

Calling Yugoslavia "Communist" is like calling India "NATO-aligned" in that it overestimates and simplifies the truth.

Not exactly, Yugoslavia claimed to be Communist, just like China does today when it's very capitalist.  Calling Yugoslavia "Warsaw Pact-aligned" would be the equivalent to calling India "NATO-aligned."
or the PRC " very capitalist".  "capitalist" govts don't control all the banks and important industries in a country.
But they are producing for profit, no? China very much is capitalist, regardless of who owns said capital.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2017, 08:28:22 PM »

Calling Yugoslavia "Communist" is like calling India "NATO-aligned" in that it overestimates and simplifies the truth.

Not exactly, Yugoslavia claimed to be Communist, just like China does today when it's very capitalist.  Calling Yugoslavia "Warsaw Pact-aligned" would be the equivalent to calling India "NATO-aligned."
or the PRC " very capitalist".  "capitalist" govts don't control all the banks and important industries in a country.

Socialist Countries, also don't have business, which are in essence controlled by chinese companies, for their enormous profit.
Logged
Senator-elect Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,726
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 07, 2017, 03:15:38 PM »

China, they had the most influence over Eastern Asia.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 14 queries.