US private sector created 235K jobs in Feb. vs. 190K est BLS (UPDATED)

[I Won - Get Over It]

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/08/private-sector-jobs-february-2017-adp.html

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It is really good news for the country and for Trump. Right?
Will his ratings go up?



UPDATE:
235,000 vs 190,000 predicted (+24%) according to BLS
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

[Classic Conservative]

We're bringing back manufacturing jobs!

[elcorazon]

Thanks Obama

[Gass3268]

Thanks Obama

[Dr. Arch]

Thanks Obama

[America Needs R'hllor]

Thanks Obama

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Thanks Obama

[I Won - Get Over It]

Remember how a crowd of sycophants would emerge to cheer the Dear Leader and remind us all of how good we really had it whenever we had a positive jobs report under the Obama administration, ignoring stagnant median pay, shifting sectors of work, precariousness, and the uneven geography of job growth?

Oh. I guess they're still going to do that.

The good news (for Trump) is that it is much better than expected (+55%).
US private sector created 298K jobs in Feb. vs. 190K est

Thanks Obama

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

"This is the situation that I inherited.  I inherited a mess, believe me." - Benedict Donald, Feb. 24, 2017.

So stupid, I'm amazed he and his cult manage to breathe.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Remember how a crowd of sycophants would emerge to cheer the Dear Leader and remind us all of how good we really had it whenever we had a positive jobs report under the Obama administration, ignoring stagnant median pay, shifting sectors of work, precariousness, and the uneven geography of job growth?

Oh. I guess they're still going to do that.

     This is what bothers me about economics. It makes pretensions of being the most rigorous of the social sciences, yet it is so intertwined with partisan politics that people refuse to recognize what is happening as long as they can spin the numbers.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

We did it, folks! President Trump is helping these people so much, there's no way he doesn't get re-elected!

Can you imagine how ugly Hillary Clinton would've made this picture? Sure recession right after the Greatest Ever was forced out.

[ApatheticAustrian]

are that now REAL numbers or once again those famous faked data points?

[krazen1211]

Wow, so much winning now that Barry is gone and replaced with our new Wonderful President. Barry voters might even have to get jobs.

[(Still) muted by Kalwejt until March 31]

Wow, so much winning now that Barry is gone and replaced with our new Wonderful President. Barry voters might even have to get jobs.

-Krazen, I'm going to have to report this post for trolling.

[Meclazine for Israel]

Remember how a crowd of sycophants would emerge to cheer the Dear Leader and remind us all of how good we really had it whenever we had a positive jobs report under the Obama administration, ignoring stagnant median pay, shifting sectors of work, precariousness, and the uneven geography of job growth?

Oh. I guess they're still going to do that.

     This is what bothers me about economics. It makes pretensions of being the most rigorous of the social sciences, yet it is so intertwined with partisan politics that people refuse to recognize what is happening as long as they can spin the numbers.

Most upsetting to a proponent of the physical sciences indeed.

Trumpy making America great again!

[RI]

Remember how a crowd of sycophants would emerge to cheer the Dear Leader and remind us all of how good we really had it whenever we had a positive jobs report under the Obama administration, ignoring stagnant median pay, shifting sectors of work, precariousness, and the uneven geography of job growth?

Oh. I guess they're still going to do that.

     This is what bothers me about economics. It makes pretensions of being the most rigorous of the social sciences, yet it is so intertwined with partisan politics that people refuse to recognize what is happening as long as they can spin the numbers.

The vast majority of economists don't operate like this. Most economists look down on those who overly politicize everything.

[Beet]

Look, it's evidence that deregulation spurs growth. The markets picked this up after Trump won the election, and they aren't wrong. That's true. Bill Clinton cut tons of regulations in the early 90s as well. But as a liberal, I know that there are externalities to deregulation-driven growth that aren't picked up in the numbers. Laxer emissions standards may lead to more production, but also dirtier air. It's a trade off.

[Dr. Arch]

Wow, so much winning now that Barry is gone and replaced with our new Wonderful President. Barry voters might even have to get jobs.

-Krazen, I'm going to have to report this post for trolling.

Krazen needs to be kicked from this forum. All he does is troll, insult others, and add nothing to conversations.

[publicunofficial]

Wow, so much winning now that Barry is gone and replaced with our new Wonderful President. Barry voters might even have to get jobs.

-Krazen, I'm going to have to report this post for trolling.

Krazen needs to be kicked from this forum. All he does is troll, insult others, and add nothing to conversations.

Once every 5 months or so he'll make a non-trolling post on the Political Geography board and that alone apparently justifies keeping him around.

[I Won - Get Over It]

Great news. We are only just beginning. Together, we are going to #MAGA!

[Hermit For Peace]

So imagine if Trump had started his administration where Obama did, down in the gutter.

How great would he be doing now?

Obama went through a lot of crap and laid the foundation for this growth. It's not all about Trump.

[Dr. Arch]

Seriously, Trump has done absolutely nothing for this, yet somehow you want to attribute it to him? Nah, we'll see how things are this time next year or so.

[pbrower2a]

It's still the Obama economy.

[Sumner 1868]

Remember how a crowd of sycophants would emerge to cheer the Dear Leader and remind us all of how good we really had it whenever we had a positive jobs report under the Obama administration, ignoring stagnant median pay, shifting sectors of work, precariousness, and the uneven geography of job growth?

Oh. I guess they're still going to do that.

^^^^^

[Phony Moderate]

Like it or not, Trump is going to get the credit for this as he's in office now. It's not fair, but that's how it works.