Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2017, 07:01:53 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Torie)
| | |-+  Why did JFK do so well in Nevada in 1960?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Why did JFK do so well in Nevada in 1960?  (Read 970 times)
The Arizonan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1009


View Profile
« on: March 15, 2017, 07:59:32 am »
Ignore

Not only did JFK win Nevada, but he won several counties in the state. What accounted for his performance and why did the state go pretty much hard Republican between 1964 and 1992?
Logged

"As a North Carolinian born & bred, I think this makes perfect sense. If you get arrested, a cop should have every right to go through your phone. If you are doing something illegal and get caught, then sucks to be you." - Risa in the comments section for an article about cellphones on Forbes.com, not that I agree with her.

(Still) muted by Kalwejt until March 31
Eharding
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3093


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2017, 06:49:42 pm »
Ignore

One word: Clark. Same reason HRC won NV.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1960&fips=32&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I suspect it had a decent Catholic population at the time.
Logged

Make America Great Again

Political Matrix Score:
Economic score: +5.29
Social score: -3.13

Declaration of Grievances and Innocence:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=173972.msg5583015#msg5583015

https://www.youtube.com/embed/2wHDOC2pOzA

Stop the Islamofascist Erdog
mencken
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1731


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2017, 08:47:27 am »
Ignore

One word: Clark. Same reason HRC won NV.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1960&fips=32&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I suspect it had a decent mob Catholic population at the time.


FTFY
Logged

Culturally conservative, economically liberal
Figueira
84285
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8655


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2017, 07:01:21 pm »
Ignore

One word: Clark. Same reason HRC won NV.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1960&fips=32&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I suspect it had a decent Catholic population at the time.


But The Arizonan was asking why Kennedy won a whole lot of other counties in Nevada, not just Clark.
Logged

Note: I am not actually British.

NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2924
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2017, 03:27:40 am »
Ignore

One word: Clark. Same reason HRC won NV.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1960&fips=32&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I suspect it had a decent Catholic population at the time.


But The Arizonan was asking why Kennedy won a whole lot of other counties in Nevada, not just Clark.

It's actually only a relatively recent phenomenon that Mormons have tended to vote overwhelmingly Republican. Additionally as an historically stereotyped religious minority, Nevada Mormons were much more receptive to the Kennedy candidacy than many other populations within America.

Throw in the historic mining tradition in Nevada, add some extra dashes of rural ranchers feeling ok with LBJ as Veep, voila you have a wining combination....
Logged

The Arizonan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1009


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2017, 11:49:18 am »
Ignore

One word: Clark. Same reason HRC won NV.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1960&fips=32&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I suspect it had a decent Catholic population at the time.


But The Arizonan was asking why Kennedy won a whole lot of other counties in Nevada, not just Clark.

It's actually only a relatively recent phenomenon that Mormons have tended to vote overwhelmingly Republican. Additionally as an historically stereotyped religious minority, Nevada Mormons were much more receptive to the Kennedy candidacy than many other populations within America.

Throw in the historic mining tradition in Nevada, add some extra dashes of rural ranchers feeling ok with LBJ as Veep, voila you have a wining combination....


I think that this may be the best answer. It's interesting that Nevada had a Republican voting streak in presidential elections between 1964 and 1992. Is it because it was a very rural state before the nineties?
Logged

"As a North Carolinian born & bred, I think this makes perfect sense. If you get arrested, a cop should have every right to go through your phone. If you are doing something illegal and get caught, then sucks to be you." - Risa in the comments section for an article about cellphones on Forbes.com, not that I agree with her.

ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6688
Austria


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2017, 11:59:27 am »
Ignore

small electorate, not very diverse before, "spirit of the West".....like in all neighbouring states.
Logged

Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4781
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2017, 02:44:50 am »
Ignore

Part of it was due to southern transplants, which is why Stevenson won Clarke County in 1956.
Logged
mianfei
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 77
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2017, 04:11:35 am »
Ignore

One word: Clark. Same reason HRC won NV.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1960&fips=32&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I suspect it had a decent Catholic population at the time.


But The Arizonan was asking why Kennedy won a whole lot of other counties in Nevada, not just Clark.

It's actually only a relatively recent phenomenon that Mormons have tended to vote overwhelmingly Republican. Additionally as an historically stereotyped religious minority, Nevada Mormons were much more receptive to the Kennedy candidacy than many other populations within America.

Throw in the historic mining tradition in Nevada, add some extra dashes of rural ranchers feeling ok with LBJ as Veep, voila you have a wining combination....
All these points made are very true. Mormons in both 1928 and 1960 had far fewer problems with a Catholic than the highly secular and liberal Pacific Northwest did. After all, Kennedy lost Multnomah County, which even George McGovern and Walter Mondale couldn’t do, and won three Utah counties (highly populous Weber, Beaver and Daggett) that no post-Johnson Democrat has carried. Nevada also possessed a highly unionized mining sector, and sizeable Catholic populations not only in the south, but even in remote areas where Basques had settled in the nineteenth century. Those rural counties Kennedy won were mostly won by Al Smith in 1928 too.

In fact, outside the “Solid South” and adjacent areas, Nevada was between 1896 and 1960 the most Democratic leaning state in the nation. It voted Republican only in the six landslides of 1904, 1920, 1924, 1928, 1952 and 1956 – and voted more Democratic than the nation in every election from 1896 to 1960 except those of 1948 and 1952. For comparison, Kentucky was more Republican than the nation in 1928, 1936 and 1960, and Oklahoma in 1928 and 1960 (anti-Catholicism in both cases of course).

It’s true that from 1964 to 1988 Nevada voted more Republican than the nation in every election, but with an economy increasingly based on sin Goldwater’s free-market rhetoric and his wife’s Planned Parenthood history would – at least in the northwest – have been less feared than in most states, and this would apply especially to the state’s growing suburban population in the 1970s and 1980s.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines