US states consider laws allowing Creationism to be taught by science teachers (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:19:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  US states consider laws allowing Creationism to be taught by science teachers (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support allowing Creationism to be taught by science teachers in public school classrooms?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 88

Author Topic: US states consider laws allowing Creationism to be taught by science teachers  (Read 4195 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« on: March 16, 2017, 02:21:55 PM »

If it is taught in an elective class yes but not in a science class
All science classes should be electives, except for math. I do agree that evolution should be taught in science classes.

The only required classes in school should be math, post-classical European history including the secular study of Abrahamic religions, and civics. Why is teaching Darwinian evolution to every student a good thing?

     Students would benefit from a solid conception of how the world operates. If science can be dispensed with, then why not math after the grade school level?
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2017, 05:10:30 PM »
« Edited: March 16, 2017, 08:54:18 PM by Senator PiT, PPT »

Moderate Hero position: The Bible should be taught in school, but if it's going to be taught literally, it would be better if it weren't taught at all.

     I like this, actually. The Bible has influenced so much literature that familiarity with it is critical to gaining a serious grounding in the history of literature. The caveat is that this approach must consider the Bible as literature to be successful; teaching it as Truth will miss the point quite widely. Oh, and also interfere with the free exercise of religion.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2017, 12:32:55 AM »

^ One could argue that Molecules-to-man evolution is not science then, as no one can reproduce it. Do you really want to use that definition?

     It can be verified without being reproduced. The theory of evolution has a vast body of evidence that supports its veracity, even though the evolutionary chain from the first eukaryote to animals today cannot actually be reproduced.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.