True there's something to that but is nominating the clear front runner to the opening really corrupt? I mean people are comparing it to Blagojevich and I don't think it's anywhere near that level.
I guess you could argue that the mere action you just described isn't proof of corruption. What is suspicious:
1. How the investigation seemed to stall out on Strange's side
2. A governor nominating the guy who is supposed to be investigating him
This looks very corrupt, but in itself is not proof of corruption. That is why there should be an investigation into it - free from political meddling.
I'm not saying there isn't something there, I just don't think nominating the clear and away front runner from your party for the seat he has openly said he is running for is a corrupt act. If corruption happened behind the scenes we need to know sure, but this in and of itself is not corrupt.