Frank Rich: "No Sympathy for the Hillbilly" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:17:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Frank Rich: "No Sympathy for the Hillbilly" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Frank Rich: "No Sympathy for the Hillbilly"  (Read 6424 times)
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
« on: March 27, 2017, 11:22:14 PM »

People like this foolish, classist man make me wonder if Democrats will win back power for the foreseeable future, despite their various advantages.  I've read several articles with this kind of tone, and they all make me simultaneously angry and very worried.

     This is something I've been saying across many threads. While there certainly is time to change their tune, so many Democrats are coming forth and speaking about the situation with the same condescending tone that drove people to vote for Trump in the first place. If they learned their lesson from the party's collapse in the Midwest, they're doing an excellent job of hiding it.

Umm, perhaps his tone could have been less argumentative, but there is an element of truth that Democrats should not be completely placating voters in a handful of states just to win the electoral college.  Also, they shouldn't think that just because Michigan, Wisconsin, etc. were the closest states in this election that these are necessarily the states they must target next time.

     Reality is, this is a block of voters that used to be solidly Democratic, but has been trending Republican because they don't see the Democrats as caring about the issues they care about. Their concerns are not the end-all be-all, but it would be hard to put together a winning coalition by simply writing them. At the least, harder than it would be to put together a winning coalition by drawing them into the fold.

OK. And?  To win some voters you will turn off others.  If 100% of people wanted the same thing we wouldn't have elections.  Many of these voters are simply not in line with democrats on social issues and many people vote on social issues nowadays.  The fact of the matter is that the Democratic coalition consistently gets more votes in Presidential years and all segments of this coalition are growing in population.  To suddenly appease rural whites as a short term fix would be dumb and threaten to break apart the already fragile coalition Democrats have been building for years.

     Talking about these people like they're hardcore conservatives is a bizarre predilection of many Democrats. Sure there are plenty of conservatives and partisan Republicans in any state, but the Obama-Trump voters who swung these states really aren't a part of that. They would be quite easy to swing back, but it doesn't sound like you're interested in doing that.

     With that said, making this about Presidential elections is an ongoing strategic failure of the Democrats, who have long underemphasized Congressional and state races. Your party has been thoroughly gutted in many state governments, a trend that has been particularly marked in the Midwest. Losing power in so many states is going to have long-term effects on your ability to compete for higher offices, not to mention the mere continued failure to focus on growing state parties. The idea that the Democratic Party is in a healthy electoral situation now is frankly absurd.

Fully agreed. Great point !
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.