Justice Department to withhold grants from sanctuary cities
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 07:51:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Justice Department to withhold grants from sanctuary cities
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Justice Department to withhold grants from sanctuary cities  (Read 2080 times)
SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 27, 2017, 05:04:40 PM »

There's a difference between refusing to aid ICE and actively sabotaging. What several cities are doing under far-left leaders crosses the line into the latter. That's not states' rights, that's nullification.

Examples?

Bill De Blasio refusing to honor warrants from ICE for known gang criminals and choosing to release them into the general public rather than ICE custody.
Source?
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,456


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 27, 2017, 05:14:58 PM »

There's a difference between refusing to aid ICE and actively sabotaging. What several cities are doing under far-left leaders crosses the line into the latter. That's not states' rights, that's nullification.

Examples?

Bill De Blasio refusing to honor warrants from ICE for known gang criminals and choosing to release them into the general public rather than ICE custody.
Source?

Probably some respectable and proven news organization with White House press credentials. Like Breitbart, Infowars and the Russian government RT.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 27, 2017, 05:18:06 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2017, 05:20:28 PM by Ebowed »

Who pays for the Justice Department if not the taxpayers in "sanctuary cities"?
Logged
Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas
Ray Goldfield
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 27, 2017, 05:50:27 PM »

There's a difference between refusing to aid ICE and actively sabotaging. What several cities are doing under far-left leaders crosses the line into the latter. That's not states' rights, that's nullification.

Examples?

Bill De Blasio refusing to honor warrants from ICE for known gang criminals and choosing to release them into the general public rather than ICE custody.
Source?

Probably some respectable and proven news organization with White House press credentials. Like Breitbart, Infowars and the Russian government RT.

It was literally a mainstream national news story.

http://pix11.com/2017/02/22/alleged-gang-members-prison-release-highlights-divide-between-ice-mayor-de-blasio/
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,633
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 27, 2017, 06:32:05 PM »

Have the states where these cities are located (since many of them are in liberal states) withhold said states tax revenue to the federal government.
Logged
SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 27, 2017, 06:43:43 PM »

There's a difference between refusing to aid ICE and actively sabotaging. What several cities are doing under far-left leaders crosses the line into the latter. That's not states' rights, that's nullification.

Examples?

Bill De Blasio refusing to honor warrants from ICE for known gang criminals and choosing to release them into the general public rather than ICE custody.
Source?

Probably some respectable and proven news organization with White House press credentials. Like Breitbart, Infowars and the Russian government RT.

It was literally a mainstream national news story.

http://pix11.com/2017/02/22/alleged-gang-members-prison-release-highlights-divide-between-ice-mayor-de-blasio/
Oh that's the one I assumed you were referring to. Yeah an ICE detainer request isn't a warrant. Big difference.
Logged
rafta_rafta
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 926


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 27, 2017, 07:00:34 PM »

ICE is getting a big budget boost, surely they should be able to undertake immigration operations without expecting state forces assistance.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 27, 2017, 07:58:20 PM »

I typically hate the term 'common sense policy' but I don't think it has ever made sense for cities to blatantly break federal law and expect to receive funding regardless. Good move by the administration. Sanctuary cities are wrong.
Logged
SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 27, 2017, 08:19:29 PM »

I typically hate the term 'common sense policy' but I don't think it has ever made sense for cities to blatantly break federal law and expect to receive funding regardless. Good move by the administration. Sanctuary cities are wrong.

What laws are the cities "blatantly breaking?" Can you name one?
Logged
Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas
Ray Goldfield
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 27, 2017, 08:20:23 PM »

There's a difference between refusing to aid ICE and actively sabotaging. What several cities are doing under far-left leaders crosses the line into the latter. That's not states' rights, that's nullification.

Examples?

Bill De Blasio refusing to honor warrants from ICE for known gang criminals and choosing to release them into the general public rather than ICE custody.
Source?

Probably some respectable and proven news organization with White House press credentials. Like Breitbart, Infowars and the Russian government RT.

It was literally a mainstream national news story.

http://pix11.com/2017/02/22/alleged-gang-members-prison-release-highlights-divide-between-ice-mayor-de-blasio/
Oh that's the one I assumed you were referring to. Yeah an ICE detainer request isn't a warrant. Big difference.

Procedural difference, maybe, but a city can't expect to actively sabotage and undermine a federal agency without financial retaliation.
Logged
SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 27, 2017, 08:43:38 PM »

There's a difference between refusing to aid ICE and actively sabotaging. What several cities are doing under far-left leaders crosses the line into the latter. That's not states' rights, that's nullification.

Examples?

Bill De Blasio refusing to honor warrants from ICE for known gang criminals and choosing to release them into the general public rather than ICE custody.
Source?

Probably some respectable and proven news organization with White House press credentials. Like Breitbart, Infowars and the Russian government RT.

It was literally a mainstream national news story.

http://pix11.com/2017/02/22/alleged-gang-members-prison-release-highlights-divide-between-ice-mayor-de-blasio/
Oh that's the one I assumed you were referring to. Yeah an ICE detainer request isn't a warrant. Big difference.

Procedural difference, maybe, but a city can't expect to actively sabotage and undermine a federal agency without financial retaliation.
No, not a "procedural difference"; a Constitutional difference. A letter from ICE doesn't amount to probable cause for anything. Absent a proper arrest warrant from the federal agency, state law enforcement has no jurisdiction to extend the period of someone's detention once their state case is dispensed with (and are in fact violating that person's constitutional rights if they do so). If ICE has actual probable cause to believe that a person is in this country illegally, and they know that person is in state jail for a couple days, then thats probably a good time to go get an arrest warrant. Every other law enforcement agency recognizes they need a warrant to go pick somebody up. Why is it so hard for ICE?
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 27, 2017, 11:24:49 PM »

I really don't see this as an issue... this is certainly within the Trump administration's right.


Honestly, I don't like how the federal government orders states to do things and then provides funding. Either the federal government should do it completely, or the state should be self-sufficient.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,684
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 28, 2017, 02:12:09 AM »

What are these grants that they won't be able to get?   It sounds from the announcement that there are other methods of making the cities comply with this that they are looking at also (?)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 12 queries.