When Runeghost starts making 50 posts a day, derailing every thread throughout multiple boards, claiming that we shouldn't have any Republican moderators, and attacking specific users, then we'll talk. His statements about Republicans are awful, and need to be addressed with at least a warning (though there are definitely a couple of posters who have made similar remarks about Democrats, and are not banned), but directly attacking users is on a different level. Those of you accusing the forum of bias, but holding up EHarding as some kind of martyr, while calling for Runeghost to be permabanned should realize that the "bias" argument goes both ways.
I wasn't referring specifically to you, and while implying people who vote a certain way (which includes members of this forum) should die is obviously inappropriate, my point was that Eharding did quite a few things that Runeghost hasn't done (to my knowledge.) I think Runeghost has made some absolutely awful posts, and should at least be given a warning, but I wish people didn't bring him up as a way of defending/supporting Eharding.
Poll
