Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 06:38:40 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2008 Elections
| | |-+  Mike Naso's Top Ten List #1 (AUG 2005)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Mike Naso's Top Ten List #1 (AUG 2005)  (Read 6840 times)
tarheel-leftist85
krustytheklown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1286
United States


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 03, 2005, 12:13:02 am »
Ignore

I know, I think it was New Haven to be specific.
Logged

Democrats: The more effective evil
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/why-barack-obama-more-effective-evil

Shirtless beer pong, brah, with brObama's speechwriter

Bros before hoes, brah
Reaganfan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12272
United States


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: August 03, 2005, 06:12:41 pm »
Ignore

Okay, so in general, what do you think of my list?
Logged
Max Power
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6234
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 03, 2005, 06:14:00 pm »
Ignore

Okay, so in general, what do you think of my list?
It's half-baked. Santa Claus has a better list.
Logged
tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35450
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 03, 2005, 06:15:38 pm »
Ignore

Okay, so in general, what do you think of my list?

Naso, if you're looking for positive feedback, you're in the wrong place.
Logged
Max Power
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6234
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 03, 2005, 06:17:34 pm »
Ignore

Okay, so in general, what do you think of my list?

Naso, if you're looking for positive feedback, you're in the wrong place.
He's been in the wrong place his whole life.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10796
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

View Profile
« Reply #30 on: August 03, 2005, 11:14:58 pm »
Ignore

Okay, so in general, what do you think of my list?

It's sexy.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10497


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: November 29, 2005, 06:55:03 pm »
Ignore

Okay, so in general, what do you think of my list?

Great work Mike.  Some top tier candidates.

McCain with either Allen or Romney would make an incredible ticket, as would Allen and Romney or Romney and Allen.

Pawlenty and Sanford are certainly up and comers on the national scene.

We will be hearing more from Hagel, Santorum, Frist and Brownback.

I doubt that Pataki, though, has too much of a political life ahead of him, at least not in an elective capacity. 
Logged




WORST PRESIDENT SINCE WORLD WAR II
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10497


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: November 29, 2005, 07:11:22 pm »
Ignore

Please pick Romney.

I totally agree.

Romney would mop the floor with any the current crop of potential Democrat nominees. 
Logged




WORST PRESIDENT SINCE WORLD WAR II
tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35450
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #33 on: November 29, 2005, 07:18:31 pm »
Ignore

Please pick Romney.

I totally agree.

Romney would mop the floor with any the current crop of potential Democrat nominees. 

I know you'll never understand this concept, but Romney is not a good candidate for several reasons.

He has a 43% approval rating and will simply be an ex-Governor in 2006, when he ducks a challenge from Reilly.

He is a Mormon.  Don't say this isn't a negative.  Listen to the religious right on this board!  jmfcst said just a few days ago that 'Mormons are not christians.'  The RR would NOT fall in lockstep with Romney under any circumstances, especially considering Romney has advocated legal abortions in the past (although he'd likely flip-flop here in a presidential run).

Against Mark Warner, Romney would be smoked.  A Roy Moore-type would spring up and take a uniform 15-20% across the south, fracturing the GOP base and we'd probably see Warner come close to, if not completely, sweep the south with pluralities.

Romney has no base.  It's hard to form a campaign when you really have no region you can count on, outside of Utah and Idaho.
Logged
tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35450
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #34 on: November 29, 2005, 07:23:32 pm »
Ignore

I should add that against Hillary Clinton, he'd still lose.

He wouldn't win anything in the northeast, save MAYBE New Hampshire.

The Roy Moore-type would still spring up, and this time be stronger, winning AL, MS, maybe the new and less black LA, etc.  Hillary might win AR and TN on the fracturing of the GOP base and Bill's influence.

It would be closer, but Hillary probably take a little over 50% of the vote against Romney's 40-42% and Roy Moore's 7-9%+.

Warner would crack 53% or so easily against Romney, who'd get a little over 40%.  Moore would be weaker.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10497


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: November 29, 2005, 09:42:56 pm »
Ignore

Thank you for expressing your views, which I always value.

I will take them under advisement.
Logged




WORST PRESIDENT SINCE WORLD WAR II
Reaganfan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12272
United States


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: November 30, 2005, 05:03:36 am »
Ignore

My list is from July 31, 2005....that's 122 days old, I'll be making an updated list soon since my views have changed slightly.
Logged
Paul Kemp
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5842
United States
View Profile
« Reply #37 on: June 27, 2011, 07:46:50 pm »
Ignore

A true piece of history. Too bad we haven't had one for 2012.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines