Democrats: If it is down to Clinton/Sanders rematch who do you support?

[publicunofficial]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

[HagridOfTheDeep]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

[Figueira]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

Believe it or not, the public votes in general elections, so considering their opinion would be a good idea in deciding who to vote for in a primary.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

My god just jerk off to Hillary already.

[Pericles]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

My god just jerk off to Hillary already.

If you Bernie supporters weren't so condescending, insulting and arrogant Bernie could have won. You confirm the worst stereotypes of the 'Berniebros'.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

My god just jerk off to Hillary already.

If you Bernie supporters weren't so condescending, insulting and arrogant Bernie could have won. You confirm the worst stereotypes of the 'Berniebros'.

Yes because Clinton surrogates and supporters were never those things

[7,052,770]

Depends on whether Bernie calls his health care plan the deceitful, dishonest name of "Medicare for All" or the correct, descriptive "Medicaid for All."

This was the primary reason I picked Hillary over Bernie in 2016, despite a closer alignment to Bernie on the issues.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Depends on whether Bernie calls his health care plan the deceitful, dishonest name of "Medicare for All" or the correct, descriptive "Medicaid for All."

This was the primary reason I picked Hillary over Bernie in 2016, despite a closer alignment to Bernie on the issues.

Lol really? Going against someone who is more aligned with you politically over wording? Geez.

[7,052,770]

Depends on whether Bernie calls his health care plan the deceitful, dishonest name of "Medicare for All" or the correct, descriptive "Medicaid for All."

This was the primary reason I picked Hillary over Bernie in 2016, despite a closer alignment to Bernie on the issues.

Lol really? Going against someone who is more aligned with you politically over wording? Geez.

I'm being a little bit facetious of course, but it did always bug me.

He may have been making a reference to Canadian Medicare, not American Medicare, in which case his terminology wasn't wrong.

[Liberalrocks]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

My god just jerk off to Hillary already.

If you Bernie supporters weren't so condescending, insulting and arrogant Bernie could have won. You confirm the worst stereotypes of the 'Berniebros'.

Totally this. I could never support Sanders or any from his brand.

[NOVA Green]

Hillary running again would demonstrate such a complete lack of self-awareness and public opinion to completely disqualify her for Presidency.

Believe it or not, it is actually possible for the public to be wrong.

My god just jerk off to Hillary already.

If you Bernie supporters weren't so condescending, insulting and arrogant Bernie could have won. You confirm the worst stereotypes of the 'Berniebros'.

Totally this. I could never support Sanders or any from his brand.

Unfortunately if you are 100% sincere in this statement, you are a part of the reason why the Democratic Party as we know it will be confined to the Presidential electoral dustbin of history....

I don't believe that I have ever been condescending and insulting towards Clinton supporters on this Forum....

If you haven't yet digested the results from the 2016 Presidential General Election, it's pretty clear that the path forward for the Democratic Party is shifting to the populist Left, and regardless of your personal opinion about Bernie or the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party, the Dems are going to continue to get their butt's kicked if they continue to roll with the corporate Neo-Liberal DLC style of politics that has dominated the National Party since after the defeat of '88.

[Pericles]

For the record, since Clinton has proven herself as a bad candidate, it would be better to go with the possible risk but big reward of Bernie Sanders. I would support Bernie and if I could redo the primary I would not support Hillary Clinton.

[cvparty]

I'd love to see the map in a round 2, but I don't think Hillary is that obtuse to run again

[publicunofficial]

"I'd like this candidate BUT ONLY if their supporters are nicer to me on the internet" was repeated constantly through 2016 and it still makes me think you're a absolute nerd for saying it.

[RaphaelDLG]

"I'd like this candidate BUT ONLY if their supporters are nicer to me on the internet" was repeated constantly through 2016 and it still makes me think you're a absolute nerd for saying it.

Ain't that the goddamn truth

[ProgressiveCanadian]

35 idiots want to lose again?

[7,052,770]

35 idiots want to lose again?

If Trump were running for re-election against Hillary and it was held today, Hillary would almost certainly win, by 2012 margins, if not 2008.

Obviously, that could change by November 2020, but it probably won't. I'm not saying we should Hillary in 2020, just that I doubt she'll blow it if we do.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

35 idiots want to lose again?

If Trump were running for re-election against Hillary and it was held today, Hillary would almost certainly win, by 2012 margins, if not 2008.

Obviously, that could change by November 2020, but it probably won't. I'm not saying we should Hillary in 2020, just that I doubt she'll blow it if we do.

Everyone on atlas told me Clinton would win 100% in 2016...So how can I actually believe she would win next time? (Also Trump will be long gone in 2020)

[Shadows]

35 idiots want to lose again?

If Trump were running for re-election against Hillary and it was held today, Hillary would almost certainly win, by 2012 margins, if not 2008.

Obviously, that could change by November 2020, but it probably won't. I'm not saying we should Hillary in 2020, just that I doubt she'll blow it if we do.

Ohh she will absolutely blow it again if the whole strategy is Trump being bad. For one, if HRC wins the nomination again, there will be a massive defection of people form the Bernie wing, some of whom will feel all that activism & everything is worth nothing & the party is not worth saving anymore & the Greens will get their best result plus many people will not vote. Noway will HRC winning again will be accepted.

Then she will have everyone of those problems that she had - She is fundamentally dishonest, she lies, she sells access in her foundation for money, she is a horrible orator, she has no emotional empathy, she is a poor campaigner, she is totally tied to big money, she doesn't have the health to campaign vigorously across states etc etc - 2020 will again be about 2 Terrible candidates, 1 who is so power hungry that she can't take a GE loss to freaking Trump & wants to run again!

[President Johnson]

This time Bernie. I have some disagreements with him, but we're through with Hillary. I want a candidate who hasn't lost to Donald Trump already.

[Fusionmunster]

35 idiots want to lose again?

How have you not been warned yet? Stop insulting people, at least try to keep the forum civil.

[GoTfan]

35 idiots want to lose again?

How have you not been warned yet? Stop insulting people, at least try to keep the forum civil.

Doesn't make it any less true.

[Technocracy Timmy]

35 idiots want to lose again?

If Trump were running for re-election against Hillary and it was held today, Hillary would almost certainly win, by 2012 margins, if not 2008.

Obviously, that could change by November 2020, but it probably won't. I'm not saying we should Hillary in 2020, just that I doubt she'll blow it if we do.

She'd lose by three points.

[heatcharger]

35 idiots want to lose again?

If Trump were running for re-election against Hillary and it was held today, Hillary would almost certainly win, by 2012 margins, if not 2008.

Obviously, that could change by November 2020, but it probably won't. I'm not saying we should Hillary in 2020, just that I doubt she'll blow it if we do.

She'd lose by three points.

Undecideds wouldn't break evenly when Trump has a 53% disapproval rating. This is irrelevant anyway.

[heatcharger]

35 idiots want to lose again?

If Trump were running for re-election against Hillary and it was held today, Hillary would almost certainly win, by 2012 margins, if not 2008.

Obviously, that could change by November 2020, but it probably won't. I'm not saying we should Hillary in 2020, just that I doubt she'll blow it if we do.

She'd lose by three points.

Undecideds wouldn't break evenly when Trump has a 53% disapproval rating. This is irrelevant anyway.

Her favorability is lower than Trump's right now. (Source)

A more recent Harvard-Harris poll had it at 43/52 compared to Trump's 44/51. Statistical noise.