Did the losing party over perform or under perform electorally in each election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:42:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Did the losing party over perform or under perform electorally in each election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did the losing party over perform or under perform electorally in each election  (Read 1350 times)
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« on: February 03, 2018, 11:35:10 PM »

In '68 the Dems overperformed, Humphrey shouldn't have made it that close, with the war and LBJ.
In '72 they underperforned but it was mainly in nominating McGovern and with Eagleton.
In '76 Carter should've won 400+ EVs.
In '88 we should've won much more, if not the election.
In '08, the GOP overperformed, Obama should have won around 400 EVs with the economy as it was.
The rest were pretty much what could be expected.


 
The GOP over performed and prevented Obama from getting 400+ EV's because their vote was pretty resilient. Losing only three million voters while had it been in the past Obama would had won 10%+ and 400+ EV's easily.

Obama was a very poor fit for TX and the Deep South compared to past Democratic nominees. This kept it from being an electoral blowout in 2008.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.