Should sugary drinks and soda be taxed?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:18:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should sugary drinks and soda be taxed?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (I/O)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 77

Author Topic: Should sugary drinks and soda be taxed?  (Read 1383 times)
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 11, 2017, 10:16:56 AM »

No, and cut the taxes on fags and alcohol as well.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2017, 12:22:31 PM »

No, and cut the taxes on fags and alcohol as well.

Australia has a tax on homosexuality? Huh
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2017, 12:27:27 PM »

The government needs to work to make healthy food cost less than unhealthy food.

This, but the best way to do this is through better agricultural policy rather than de facto regressive sumptuary taxes.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2017, 12:29:22 PM »

No, and cut the taxes on fags and alcohol as well.

Australia has a tax on homosexuality? Huh

No, it's an anti-tax. Every homosexual in Australia is paid $1,000,000 annually - that's about $750,000 in U. S. dollars according to the article I read.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,838
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2017, 12:55:55 PM »

I'm actually not a fan of it; I know there's an argument about using taxation to change lifestyle habits, but I feel that, in the UK you're already paying 20% on it through VAT.

Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 12, 2017, 08:06:09 PM »

If implemented nationwide I would worry they'd change the sodas to be made with sugar alcohols that can be awful on the digestive system.  There's too much of that going on already. 
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: April 13, 2017, 11:11:27 AM »

Of course. It's time for the poor to pay their fair share.
I am very sympathetic to this argument. I'd rather we cut corn subsidies and shift them to things like carrots and apples. Barring that, though, I don't know what else is to be done. People seem to be blind to the obesity epidemic, which is right up there with heroin, honestly, and the calories in drinks.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,232
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: April 16, 2017, 09:30:23 PM »

I'm undecided on the subject, but if there is to be a tax on sugary drinks, it shouldn't apply to artificial sweeteners and it should be based on the amount of sugar in the drink. The taxes I've seen proposed tax per ounce regardless of amount of sugar or even it's an artificial sweetener. If we're looking at health issues, I'd once again have to point the finger at HFCS, something that didn't appear in our food or drinks until about the mid-1980s.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: April 16, 2017, 11:10:15 PM »

Obviously. Anyone who desires a truly strong nation knows that we cannot afford empty calories.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: April 17, 2017, 12:20:50 AM »

Obviously. Anyone who desires a truly strong nation knows that we cannot afford empty calories.
Indeed! We are becoming a nation of weak Athenians rather than strong Spartans!
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,269
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: April 17, 2017, 03:13:59 AM »

holy hell, when did the left fall in love with regressive taxes?  You hate free speech and love war, think violence is perfectly acceptable tool to use on someone who disagrees with you, you keep coming up with new ways to tax poor people....ugggg...and the right loves Russia and hates free markets....wtf is wrong with you people?
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: April 17, 2017, 11:56:10 AM »

holy hell, when did the left fall in love with regressive taxes?  You hate free speech and love war, think violence is perfectly acceptable tool to use on someone who disagrees with you, you keep coming up with new ways to tax poor people....ugggg...and the right loves Russia and hates free markets....wtf is wrong with you people?

The more time passes, the increasingly archaic I start to realize my political views actually are. Assuming they were ever actually popular, that is. Tongue
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,702
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: April 17, 2017, 05:17:44 PM »

Taxes should not be used as a tool to penalize the poor for enjoying unhealthy food/drink.

If our objective is building the foundation of a healthier society, it may be a smarter idea to enforce stronger food safety standards/regulations, or draft subsidies for real organic foods, and most importantly take a sword to those corps like Coca Cola and McDonalds which thrive on enforcing an unhealthy planet for the purpose of profit.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: April 23, 2017, 02:30:55 AM »

No, and cut the taxes on fags and alcohol as well.

Australia has a tax on homosexuality? Huh

No, it's an anti-tax. Every homosexual in Australia is paid $1,000,000 annually - that's about $750,000 in U. S. dollars according to the article I read.

Fags = cigarettes, my bad.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: April 23, 2017, 07:54:30 AM »

Yes as long as we cut taxes elsewhere. There should be a revenue neutral sugar tax. If we must keep Medicare and Medicaid; then tax sugar and use the funds to pay for society's inevitable obesity related diseases and them clogging up Medicare and Medicaid.

If we didn't have these government programs, then no. Also no soda for food stamp recipients.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: April 23, 2017, 09:50:16 AM »

No, and cut the taxes on fags and alcohol as well.

Australia has a tax on homosexuality? Huh

No, it's an anti-tax. Every homosexual in Australia is paid $1,000,000 annually - that's about $750,000 in U. S. dollars according to the article I read.

Fags = cigarettes, my bad.

Yeah, I had heard that term before. It was a joke. Tongue
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,803
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: April 23, 2017, 10:58:59 AM »

Where does the Starbucks unicorn drink fall on the taxation spectrum?
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,243
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: April 23, 2017, 11:47:11 AM »

Where does the Starbucks unicorn drink fall on the taxation spectrum?

A million percent.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: April 24, 2017, 05:48:32 AM »

No, and cut the taxes on fags and alcohol as well.

Australia has a tax on homosexuality? Huh

No, it's an anti-tax. Every homosexual in Australia is paid $1,000,000 annually - that's about $750,000 in U. S. dollars according to the article I read.

Fags = cigarettes, my bad.

Yeah, I had heard that term before. It was a joke. Tongue

My bad Tongue
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 14 queries.