Why Tulsi Gabbard will win the nomination in 2020

[Sbane]

If Syria escalates there is a chance she will be the nominee. Otherwise I don't see it.

[Sbane]

Gabbard refuses to denounce Bannon: https://twitter.com/tommyxtopher/status/853968963931430912

If a Democrat is going to defeat Trump in 2020, it's not going to be by denouncing Bannon. I don't think Gabbard will be the nominee for a multitude of reasons, but at least she is talking about policy and what she wants to do for her constituency. If the Democrats choose a Clintonesque strategy of solely running against Trump, and not running for something, they will continue to lose.

[Sbane]

I'm seriously doubtful a woman who uses the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism" will be able to get much support from the Democrats, no matter how progressive she is.

It actually is radical Islamic terrorism and Democrats would do better if they called a spade a spade while pursuing an isolationist foreign policy.

[Sbane]

I'm seriously doubtful a woman who uses the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism" will be able to get much support from the Democrats, no matter how progressive she is.

It actually is radical Islamic terrorism and Democrats would do better if they called a spade a spade while pursuing an isolationist foreign policy.

Gabbard isn't an isolationist, but she doesn't support removing Assad , which would only benefit ISIS, Al Qaeda, and the other jihadists running around Syria. The establishment is mad that she's criticized Obama, Hillary, and now Trump there. It's sad that her Stop Arming Terrorists Act is controversial.

By isolationist I mean being against intervention in complex situations like Syria. Americans are ok with covert actions taking out terrorists but they are not interested in getting involved in another conflict.