Why is Labour supporting this?
I know whenever we have these over-confident snap elections in Canada, the governing party gets turfed. See Ontario 1990 and Alberta 2015.
Because the official opposition cannot say no to a GE, it's like admitting they're pointless
Snap elections are incredibly unpopular. The Tories can spin that any way they like, but I can't see it overcoming the population's disgust with having to go to the polls again. Now Labour can't use this issue as leverage.
What about the 2000 federal? Chretien called the Alliance's bluff and won an even bigger majority.
It is a pretty good analogy, yes. I know I'm grasping at straws here, but the 1997-2000 term was 3.5 years long, while my Ontario and Alberta examples are closer to an even 3. Perhaps those six months made all the difference in voter's minds?
Anyways, the UK election will only be 2 years after the last one, which is extremely reckless in my mind, and would never fly over here.