What is a candidate that would cause a "weird" result?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:28:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  What is a candidate that would cause a "weird" result?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is a candidate that would cause a "weird" result?  (Read 817 times)
DPKdebator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,080
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.81, S: 3.65

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 18, 2017, 02:46:41 PM »

What potential candidates could cause a "weird", in terms of causing an unusual state vote (i.e. a Republican that wins Wisconsin but not Ohio and a Democrat that wins Arizona but not Virginia), result in the general election?
Logged
Adam the Gr8
AM33
Rookie
**
Posts: 117
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2017, 04:12:24 PM »

John Bell Edwards vs Charlie Baker could get kinda' funky.
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2017, 04:44:50 PM »

I'm not sure there are any. The election of 2016 cemented voter trends that have been in progress since at least the 1960s and in that sense was probably the "least funky" election of all time (1976 was the "funkiest" in modern times, as strange as that seems). Could the Dems nominate someone more populist than Bernie? Could the GOP nominate someone more moderate than Kasich? Doubtful. R and D primary voters determine our choices long before a single GE vote is cast. The best hope is for a 3rd party candidate to come along who pulls in all the disaffected voter groups (those who voted or would have voted Anderson '80, Perot '92, Perot '96, Nader '00, Stein '12 or '16, Johnson '12 or '16, etc.)
Logged
Bakersfield Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,737
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2017, 05:50:32 PM »

John Bell Edwards vs Charlie Baker could get kinda' funky.

Add Steve Bullock to the Dem ticket and things could get interesting.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2017, 05:58:31 PM »

A complete dark horse.
Logged
Kringla Heimsins
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 346
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2017, 11:16:08 AM »

Roy Cooper/John Bel Edwards against Charlie Baker/Jon Huntsman would be pretty interesting to watch, in addition to being an actually realistic scenario.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,235
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2017, 12:09:11 PM »

Maybe a winning candidate chose a highly unconventional running mate and then didn't finish his or her term.  Then the unconventional Vice President becomes President and governs very differently from the party line, that would be interesting.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2017, 12:58:53 PM »

Roy Cooper/John Bel Edwards against Charlie Baker/Jon Huntsman would be pretty interesting to watch, in addition to being an actually realistic scenario.

Lol

Anyway, why would Baker produce a weird result? He's like Romney without the Mormonism.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,644
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2017, 06:22:52 PM »

Bullock, JBE, or a Mormon Democrat.
Logged
Lourdes
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,810
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2017, 08:28:31 PM »

Joe Manchin maybe, if he can get through the 2018 election.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,901
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2017, 10:08:58 PM »

John Bell Edwards vs Charlie Baker could get kinda' funky.

God that would be a fascinating and no-lose race. Why aren't we that lucky?
Logged
Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas
Ray Goldfield
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,730


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2017, 11:26:29 PM »

Roy Cooper/John Bel Edwards against Charlie Baker/Jon Huntsman would be pretty interesting to watch, in addition to being an actually realistic scenario.

Lol

Anyway, why would Baker produce a weird result? He's like Romney without the Mormonism.

Baker is a genuinely popular moderate. Romney had virtually no appeal in the northeast, Baker would.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2017, 04:14:56 PM »

Roy Cooper/John Bel Edwards against Charlie Baker/Jon Huntsman would be pretty interesting to watch, in addition to being an actually realistic scenario.

Lol

Anyway, why would Baker produce a weird result? He's like Romney without the Mormonism.

Baker is a genuinely popular moderate. Romney had virtually no appeal in the northeast, Baker would.

After going through a Republican primary? I doubt it.
Logged
DPKdebator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,080
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.81, S: 3.65

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2017, 04:19:12 PM »

Roy Cooper/John Bel Edwards against Charlie Baker/Jon Huntsman would be pretty interesting to watch, in addition to being an actually realistic scenario.

Lol

Anyway, why would Baker produce a weird result? He's like Romney without the Mormonism.

Baker is a genuinely popular moderate. Romney had virtually no appeal in the northeast, Baker would.

After going through a Republican primary? I doubt it.

How do you think Baker would do if, because of some magic trick or whatever, he makes it out of the primary as a moderate?
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2017, 04:28:06 PM »

Roy Cooper/John Bel Edwards against Charlie Baker/Jon Huntsman would be pretty interesting to watch, in addition to being an actually realistic scenario.

Lol

Anyway, why would Baker produce a weird result? He's like Romney without the Mormonism.

Baker is a genuinely popular moderate. Romney had virtually no appeal in the northeast, Baker would.

After going through a Republican primary? I doubt it.

How do you think Baker would do if, because of some magic trick or whatever, he makes it out of the primary as a moderate?

In that case he'd do better than average in suburbs, but not enough to win states like MA, or even CT or NJ.
Logged
SoLongAtlas
VirginiaModerate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,219
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2017, 08:01:41 AM »

Jim Webb (moderate Dem, gets a lot of GOP support), Charlie Baker (liberal Rep., gets a lot of ind and some Dem support).
Logged
DK_Mo82
Rookie
**
Posts: 209
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 21, 2017, 01:37:01 PM »

Sanders in a scenario where the economy had not entered recession during Trump presidency.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.