Should Sanders continue to campaign for a pro-life progressive?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 02:37:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should Sanders continue to campaign for a pro-life progressive?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Should Sanders continue to campaign for a pro-life progressive?  (Read 1371 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,047
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 21, 2017, 08:33:49 PM »

Apparently Sanders is getting a lot of criticism from the left (and DNC) for campaigning for a progressive Democrat in Nebraska who's pro-life

http://www.npr.org/2017/04/20/524962482/sanders-defends-campaigning-for-anti-abortion-rights-democrat

If you want to win in Nebraska, getting someone elected who's progressive on economic issues, who's progressive on criminal justice issues, who's progressive on environmentalist issues, whose only "conservative" stance is being anti-abortion (and he's not running with it on his platform as mayor, https://heathmello.com/issues/)... that's a pretty good deal, to me.

Funny how it's the DNC with a purity test on this one.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,697


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2017, 08:37:47 PM »

"measure requiring doctors to inform women seeking abortions about the availability of an ultrasound"

Anything more serious than that?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2017, 08:45:31 PM »

I don't have a problem with it, but as the NPR article notes, he's "anti-abortion rights", not anti-abortion. We don't have a problem with people who are anti-abortion. Some people have purity tests on some issues but not others... I, personally, have no purity tests at all, at least for local races. I've always advocated for moderation.
Logged
Cashew
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,566
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2017, 08:47:55 PM »

And people laughed when I said local Democrats in red states would be better off if the national party cut off ties instead of sabotaging them with these cultural purity tests.
Logged
Deblano
EdgarAllenYOLO
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,680
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2017, 08:58:21 PM »

I hate to use the "both sides" argument, but both parties gets insufferably purist on the topic of abortion.

However, back when I used to call myself a Republican, I felt more comfortable calling myself a pro-choice then I hypothetically would have felt calling myself a pro-life Democrat.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2017, 09:26:08 PM »

If you folks have any ambition of promoting an ideology of community as opposed to yet another "liberal capitalism lite", then yes.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2017, 09:38:00 PM »

In Nebraska, yeah, that makes perfect sense in strategic terms.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2017, 09:41:15 PM »

Sanders doesn't care about social issues as much as he cares about electing progressives of all stripes. He knows that it's going to take a big coalition to get his agenda passed.

Bernie can be really stupid at times, strategically, but sometimes, he's quite smart. the stupidity is on Jon Ossoff, who he took a long time to endorse, and other times, he's smart enough to focus on the pocketbook issues.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,697


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2017, 09:47:10 PM »

I'll just LOL if there are John Bel Edwards fans attacking him for this.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2017, 10:04:55 PM »

In Nebraska, yeah, that makes perfect sense in strategic terms.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,633
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2017, 10:34:52 PM »

Yes. In fact we need to bring social conservatives into the party en masse, in particular on gun issues but abortion is good too.
Logged
Technocracy Timmy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,641
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2017, 11:09:27 PM »

Social issues are regional and divisive in nature so I'm not surprised by this.

Yes he should campaign for him.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,235
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 21, 2017, 11:25:54 PM »

Yes. In fact we need to bring social conservatives into the party en masse, in particular on gun issues but abortion is good too.

To be fair the Democratic Party has millions of social conservatives who are loyal voters.  If it wasn't for the Southern Strategy they might mostly be Republicans now.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 21, 2017, 11:28:24 PM »

If he wants to. Nobody's stopping him.

And speaking as a Utah Democrat, I feel like backing away from big-tent candidates like Mello is self-defeating. The way you win in red states is getting candidates with unorthodox views. In some states, it's pro-gun Dems, in others it's anti-abortion Dems. In Utah, it's Democrats who appeal to Mormons.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 21, 2017, 11:31:00 PM »
« Edited: April 21, 2017, 11:40:52 PM by Shadows »

Isn't Tim Kaine & Joe Manchin pro-life as well? By this logic, Dems should abandon them as well. I am not even sure if this guy qualifies to be pro-life, he is probably somewhere between a pro-life & a pro-choice. If this guy was in the Senate, he would be a reliable Democrat vote for the Supreme Court for liberal justices.

If Nebraska, you have a super progressive candidate, but Sanders' should abandon him because he is not 100% pro-choice? This would essentially mean surrendering most parts to the GOP & severely damaging economic progressive ideas !
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2017, 11:35:05 PM »
« Edited: April 21, 2017, 11:39:57 PM by Shadows »

MSNBC's "Morning Joe" panel ripped the Democratic Party's left flank for abandoning an Omaha, Nebraska, mayoral candidate with a mixed record on abortion rights, calling it "stupid," "splintered," and "autocratic." NARAL Pro-Choice America roasted the DNC as "politically stupid" for backing a candidate who will "strip women … of our basic rights." Daily Kos withdrew its endorsement of Mello for his views violating the site's "deepest values."Liberal pundit Joan Walsh trashed Sanders for giving Mello his support but not offering it to Georgia congressional candidate Jon Ossoff.

"He agreed to a bill that said a doctor could tell a woman she had a right to have an ultrasound, and for that, they're blowing up the party?" he asked. "These are not people that want to be in charge of the House and the Senate again."Scarborough said some in the party's behavior was "short-sighted" and "stupid," comparing it to a hypothetical pro-choice Republican not getting support from the party in New England. Historian Jon Meacham relayed his experience growing up in Tennessee and how Democrats used to dominate the state's congressional delegation. Now, Republicans have statewide control, he said, due to Democrats having "autocratic" standards for candidates.

Liberal Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson said the Democratic Party's problem right now was simply being too small."If it's going to recover, it's going to do it by getting bigger and it's going to make a bigger tent, so that means a 50-state strategy," he said. "It's certainly a lot more than the sort of bicoastal strategy that it has now, so it's going to have to accommodate different views or at least nuances of views." "This requirement for 100 percent purity is a recipe to be a coastal minority party," said co-host Willie Geist. "If you're not willing to, on this one sliver of an issue, allow a little leeway for somebody who might be able to win and put a Democrat in that seat, you're not going to win across the country."

Amidst the flurry of anger against his candidacy from the left, Mello told the Huffington Post he would not do anything in office to restrict "reproductive health care."

Full Article - ://freebeacon.com/issues/morning-joe-democratic-stupid-abandonment-omaha-mayoral-candidate-abortion-record/
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 21, 2017, 11:40:04 PM »
« Edited: April 21, 2017, 11:43:48 PM by Ronnie »

I normally roll my eyes at Scarborough's histrionics, but he's absolutely right on this one.  The Democratic Party is a big tent party, so it will naturally have differences across regions, particularly on cultural issues such as abortion, but also on economics (which is where I disagree with Bernie).  The same goes for the GOP.  Factions within the Democratic party have to learn to coexist, or else there is a real risk that it will be consigned to represent the coasts and not much more.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2017, 11:47:59 PM »

I normally roll my eyes at Scarborough's histrionics, but he's absolutely right on this one.  The Democratic Party is a big tent party, so it will naturally have differences across regions, particularly on cultural issues such as abortion, but also on economics (which is where I disagree with Bernie).  The same goes for the GOP.  Factions within the Democratic party have to learn to coexist, or else there is a real risk that it will be consigned to represent the coasts and not much more.

Yeah, being a big tent party is a two-way street, too. If someone like Ossoff who's running in Tom Price's district wants to be a fiscal conservative, he should be able to, and Democrats should be okay supporting that as well. It's not just for social issues like abortion rights or gun regulation. It depends on the district.
Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2017, 11:50:38 PM »

Sometimes party purists just need to shut the hell up. You can't have a San Francisco Democrat running in Nebraska, for God's sake. I'm pretty staunchly pro-choice, but if Nebraskans are largely pro-life then it only makes sense for the Democrat to represent their interests and values, not those of people thousands of miles away.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,087
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 22, 2017, 12:08:55 AM »

He can do what he wants. With that said, I doubt the incumbent will lose.
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,708
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2017, 12:13:04 AM »

Yes. In fact we need to bring social conservatives into the party en masse, in particular on gun issues but abortion is good too.

Great way to break the Democratic Party into two separate ones and insure permanent Republican rule.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2017, 12:17:46 AM »

Yes. In fact we need to bring social conservatives into the party en masse, in particular on gun issues but abortion is good too.

Great way to break the Democratic Party into two separate ones and insure permanent Republican rule.

Because this current "anything goes on economic policies but DON'T YOU DARE oppose abortion or gay marriage" attitude is working so well for Democrats right now.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2017, 12:49:38 AM »

Yes. In fact we need to bring social conservatives into the party en masse, in particular on gun issues but abortion is good too.

Great way to break the Democratic Party into two separate ones and insure permanent Republican rule.

*ensure
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2017, 01:03:52 AM »

I normally roll my eyes at Scarborough's histrionics, but he's absolutely right on this one.  The Democratic Party is a big tent party, so it will naturally have differences across regions, particularly on cultural issues such as abortion, but also on economics (which is where I disagree with Bernie).  The same goes for the GOP.  Factions within the Democratic party have to learn to coexist, or else there is a real risk that it will be consigned to represent the coasts and not much more.

Sometimes party purists just need to shut the hell up. You can't have a San Francisco Democrat running in Nebraska, for God's sake. I'm pretty staunchly pro-choice, but if Nebraskans are largely pro-life then it only makes sense for the Democrat to represent their interests and values, not those of people thousands of miles away.

Exactly right on both of these. Many Utah Democrats are party purists and it's got us... a super-super minority in the state legislature, no Congressional seats, no gubernatorial win in 30 years, no Senate win in 40 years, and so on and so on. They think they're San Francisco Dems (some with an anti-Mormon attitude) in one of the reddest states in the nation.
Logged
Shameless Lefty Hack
Chickenhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,178


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2017, 03:23:08 AM »

If he's good on everything else, I'll take a hit on one issue. Especially if it's an issue he'll have no power over whatsoever as Omaha mayor.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 12 queries.