Should POTUS have line-item veto power?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 10, 2024, 07:36:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should POTUS have line-item veto power?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Yes (D)		  
#2
No (D)		  
#3
Yes (R)		  
#4
No (R)		  
#5
Yes (I/O)		  
#6
No (I/O)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Should POTUS have line-item veto power?  (Read 1947 times)
Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,363
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 25, 2017, 09:03:13 PM »
« edited: April 25, 2017, 09:06:39 PM by Senator Scott »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-item_veto

Preferably say why it is where you stand.  I'm a bit on the fence with this one.  Lean no, because I can easily see a situation where Congress is split or D controlled while Trump is in office, and any bargain they get negotiating with Congressional Republicans is vetoed out of the budget.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,972


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2017, 09:11:58 PM »
Yes if it only applies to pork
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,968
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2017, 09:15:55 PM »
No, the Presidency has already become way too powerful.

lol
Logged
Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,073


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2017, 10:30:36 PM »
No, it would make negotiating effectively impossible.


That's adorable.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,463


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2017, 11:21:00 PM »
Quote from: Santander on April 25, 2017, 09:15:55 PM
No, the Presidency has already become way too powerful.

lol
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,234
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2017, 12:51:59 AM »
No. It will only make it even more difficult to pass anything in Congress.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2017, 01:42:32 AM »
Some clause to make sure negotiations aren't broken should be ensured.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2017, 07:07:41 PM »
No (R), we need to stop transferring legislative power to the executive branch.
Logged
Torie
Moderator
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,063
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2017, 10:04:00 AM »
No.  Budgets are a series of compromises, and if the POTUS can unilaterally knock things out, it makes compromises difficult.
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2017, 11:32:33 AM »
Quote from: Santander on April 25, 2017, 09:15:55 PM
No, the Presidency has already become way too powerful.

Ordinarily I would agree with this, but on the other hand....

Quote from: Scarlet Revolution on April 25, 2017, 10:30:36 PM
No, it would make negotiating effectively impossible.

Quote from: En Marche Forcée on April 26, 2017, 12:51:59 AM
No. It will only make it even more difficult to pass anything in Congress.

Quote from: Torie on May 07, 2017, 10:04:00 AM
No.  Budgets are a series of compromises, and if the POTUS can unilaterally knock things out, it makes compromises difficult.

...I think the ends might justify the means in this case.
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,595
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2017, 02:29:44 PM »
Heck no...
Logged
Mercenary
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,574


Political Matrix
E: -3.94, S: -2.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2017, 05:43:12 PM »
The presidency needs less power not nearly unlimited legislative power. Line item veto would make a president ridiculously powerful.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,191
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 12, 2017, 05:45:32 PM »
     The Presidency is too powerful at this time, though I would gladly knock out some of the other powers the office has accrued and give it a line-item veto instead.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,575
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2017, 05:45:17 PM »
Terrible idea. And what year is this? 1995?
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,034
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2017, 05:52:45 AM »
Yes, why not? It's working well in the states for governors
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2017, 10:42:05 AM »
Quote from: Vosem on April 28, 2017, 07:07:41 PM
No (R), we need to stop transferring legislative power to the executive branch.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 14 queries.