Which state Democratic Party is in better shape long-term--KY or WV?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:06:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Which state Democratic Party is in better shape long-term--KY or WV?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which state Democratic Party is better off?
#1
Kentucky
 
#2
West Virginia
 
#3
Neither
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: Which state Democratic Party is in better shape long-term--KY or WV?  (Read 1025 times)
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 26, 2017, 06:06:51 PM »

Which state Democratic Party is in better shape long-term--Kentucky or West Virginia?
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2017, 07:16:22 PM »

Assuming this means locally, easily WV.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,236
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2017, 07:27:49 PM »

They have a higher floor in Kentucky but a higher ceiling in West Virginia.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2017, 08:46:54 PM »

They have a higher floor in Kentucky but a higher ceiling in West Virginia.
So long as the ceiling clears 50%, I think I'd prefer a higher floor.
Logged
Babeuf
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 501


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2017, 09:10:47 PM »

Having a Senator and a (just-elected) Governor has to count for something. They're both in pretty bad shape long-term but I'd put the WV Dems a bit ahead here.
Logged
PAK Man
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 752


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2017, 07:02:00 AM »

From an outsider's perspective, it seems to me that as long as you're aggressively pro-coal in West Virginia, you'll win, regardless of what political party you belong to. Look at Justice; he won by a fairly respectable margin while Clinton got absolutely trounced in West Virginia; part of the reason she did so horribly was because it was perceived that she was anti-coal. I saw a mini-documentary on Facebook about a county in West Virginia that gave Trump his biggest victory in the primary season of any other county in the nation. When they interviewed the people who lived there, they all said Clinton was anti-coal, and that's why they didn't vote for her. One guy admitted he voted for Obama twice and was voting for Trump because he thought he'd bring the coal jobs back.

Again, this is coming from a complete outsider who has never set foot in West Virginia, but it seems to me that's what's happening here.
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2017, 09:33:15 AM »

Kentucky. Where can they build a base from long term in WV? Morgantown? Charleston? In Kentucky, there's a better place to build up from if things keep going the way they are. Louisville, Lexington, and Frankfort have good potential.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2017, 09:35:37 AM »

Not that past politics is that relevant or anything, but while both states have trended away from the Democrats, KY was never that loyal to begin with, at least not compared to WV.  As others have said, that has got to count for something.  West Virginia doesn't have areas like the Louisville and Cincinnati suburbs plus the ancestrally (super-)Republican areas in Eastern Kentucky that create such a large natural (historical) Republican voting bloc, even with semi-popular and moderate Democrats.  There are obviously exceptions in both states (Beshear in KY and Moore-Capito in WV), but generally Democrats have more potential voters in local races in WV, IMO.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2017, 09:36:40 AM »

Kentucky. Where can they build a base from long term in WV? Morgantown? Charleston? In Kentucky, there's a better place to build up from if things keep going the way they are. Louisville, Lexington, and Frankfort have good potential.

The problem is, in Kentucky, all of those cities you named can be outvoted by the Republican margins in their suburbs and exurbs.  West Virginia Democrats still get a lot of support from rural voters.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2017, 01:27:34 PM »

I stick with what I said earlier, but if the Cincinnati suburbs start liberalizing, KY GOP could be in some trouble.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2017, 09:44:58 PM »

They have a higher floor in Kentucky but a higher ceiling in West Virginia.

This is sort of what I think.

WV is newer to supporting the GOP, and it's not impossible that the GOP could sour the relationship by cutting SSI/SSD and all sorts of social net benefits that large numbers of West Virginians need.  Or if the GOP screws over the coal miners on a key issue.  I do think that the road back for WV Democrats is more likely to be found than for KY Democrats.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2017, 11:31:05 PM »

Obviously WV because of the reasons RINO Tom mentioned. Also, the Republican trend in KY is arguably stronger than in WV, which explains why Bevin won and Cole lost.

And no, I don't see the Cincinnati suburbs becoming "more liberal". I know some people here think that all suburban areas are trending Democratic, but it's simply not the case. Even if it were to happen, Kentucky is that Republican that it wouldn't hurt the KY GOP much, especially if they continue to do extremely well in rural KY.
It's certainly a big if. The Indiana and Ohio portions of the Cinci suburbs haven't liberalized, but it isn't unthinkable. So long as the Democratic ceiling in Kentucky tops 50%--and it does, for now--a higher floor is better than a higher ceiling. And KY has a higher floor.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 07, 2017, 11:57:12 AM »

I stick with what I said earlier, but if the Cincinnati suburbs start liberalizing, KY GOP could be in some trouble.

I'm pretty sure Hillary won a precinct in Park Hills. My jaw hit the floor when I saw this.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 07, 2017, 12:35:54 PM »

Kentucky has had some fine Democratic governors -- Beshear and Ford -- I'm surprised that Wendell Ford didn't run for President.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 14 queries.