Does Kander prove MO is not completely gone for Dems? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 01, 2024, 04:42:04 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)

Does Kander prove MO is not completely gone for Dems? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Does he?

#1 Yes		35 (61.4%)
#2 No		22 (38.6%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 57

Author

Topic: Does Kander prove MO is not completely gone for Dems? (Read 3212 times)

Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution

Posts: 88,755

Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

Re: Does Kander prove MO is not completely gone for Dems?

« on: May 21, 2017, 03:04:13 PM »

Quote from: Bagel23 on May 21, 2017, 01:29:55 PM

McCaskill does.

Locally, MO votes for Democrats. However, as a Veep Presidential candidate, he can help carry MO. Otherwise, Dems have 266 electors v. GOP 235, with either Iowa, Virginia or Ohio will get them the WH.

Logged

Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution

Posts: 88,755

Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

	Re: Does Kander prove MO is not completely gone for Dems? « Reply #1 on: May 29, 2017, 09:39:46 AM »
	« Edited: May 29, 2017, 09:41:20 AM by Da-Jon »

This is exactly what Cory Booker needs is a Afghanistani Vet to reach out to military families. Dems don't need MO, NC or even FL. But, they can reach out to the white working class in PA and Iowa and FL, that Clinton failed to win over as she failed to win the presidency

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.