Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2013, 03:31:53 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
| | |-+  Dean's running mate
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 Print
Author Topic: Dean's running mate  (Read 19234 times)
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4348
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

View Profile
« on: December 30, 2003, 07:40:24 am »
Ignore

Assuming that Dean will receive the Democratic nomination (and that still hangs in the balance, no matter what the polls say), who do you think will or should be his Vice Presidential candidate?

If you support someone else for the nomination, or think someone other than Dean will win the primaries, then by all means let us know who their running mate should be.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2003, 08:00:32 am by Michael Zeigermann »Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26101


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2003, 07:48:05 am »
Ignore

It depends on whether Dean is the crazy liberal the reps make him out to be. If he is pragmatic he will balance the ticket with someone more to the right, like Clark or Lieberman. If he is going to go all the way he will chose a cloned version of himself. Reagan chose Schweiker in 1976 in a desperate attempt to sway liberal republicans over to his side at the convention but it didn't work. Then he chose Bush the second time, who was arguably close to him. Usually a candidate makes a pragmatic choice, but you never know with Dean...
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53003
Norway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2003, 07:54:40 am »
Ignore

Dean has always been good at playing to his audiance... so he will probably choose a centrist as VP.
Logged

'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2003, 09:25:42 am »
Ignore

Dean has some problems in picking a running mate.  he is running against the establishment of the Democrat party.  So how can he pick a senator or Congressman.  Did you see he just attacked Terry McAulliffe in the last few days.

Edwards has said no.  Clark and Dean had a little spat about it already, and very publicly.  

Another governor would be the most logical, considering Dean's rants, but who ever knows with Dean.
Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4348
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2003, 11:58:26 am »
Ignore

You're right, Dean has massive problems picking a running mate. I agree that Clark and Edwards are unrealistic choices, but then so is Hillary. I guess it's a question of personal preference, who Dean supporters would like to see as his RM.

In any case, Dean would do well to choose a rival, namely Dick Gephardt. It's a move that would unite the Party and go some way to heal the fractions his campaign has opened up (much the same way Reagan chose his closest rival from the 1980 primaries, George Bush. It was an inspired move because it displayed party unity - something the Democrats desperately need to convey next year).
« Last Edit: December 30, 2003, 12:02:54 pm by Michael Zeigermann »Logged
jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2003, 12:17:06 pm »
Ignore

But of allt eh Candidates Gephardt si the most establishment candidate of all the candidates.  

His TAX INCREASE proposals do line up with Dean's though.


You're right, Dean has massive problems picking a running mate. I agree that Clark and Edwards are unrealistic choices, but then so is Hillary. I guess it's a question of personal preference, who Dean supporters would like to see as his RM.

In any case, Dean would do well to choose a rival, namely Dick Gephardt. It's a move that would unite the Party and go some way to heal the fractions his campaign has opened up (much the same way Reagan chose his closest rival from the 1980 primaries, George Bush. It was an inspired move because it displayed party unity - something the Democrats desperately need to convey next year).
Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2003, 12:20:47 pm »
Ignore

oh and Gephardt has no foreign policy experience either.
Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
Clay
GWBFan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3632


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -6.61

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2003, 12:26:08 pm »
Ignore

Seeing how Dean has had so much success with the Internet, wouldn't it be cool if he had a poll asking voters who should be his running mate?

I doubt many Dean supporters would like Clark - he's tried time and time again to stop Dean (with no success, I might add).  Edwards would be Clark with no "stop Dean" credentials.  But judging by Edwards failure to even beat Kucinich in some polls, I doubt he'd be a possibility.

Dick Morris thinks Hillary might be the VP pick of Dean, but who knows?  The Clinton's have tried their own "Stop Dean" scenarios (enter Clark), so they might be out too.

Harold Ford, Jr. would be a good pick.  Or John Lewis from my state of Georgia.  Lewis wouldn't win GA for Dean, but it could help some - along with other southern states.
Logged

jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2003, 12:33:35 pm »
Ignore

True and good point.  Dean did ask the followers about it when it came to opting out of the Campaign finance laws.

I like ford as an intrguing candidate, but he now supports Kerry.  Plus as it is with hima d Lewis and they are black and not sure how that would play.  It will happen someday, but not sure if it will be 2004, would help Dean with credentials among blacks though.

Clark would add foreign policy, but recent tiff with Dean won't help, plus Clark hasn't said anything about DOMESTIC issues.

I would still think Graham would be the top pick.  He is a governor and getting out of the senate but with the experience to govern the senate ( what would Clark know about that?) Plus Graham is froma battleground state of FL which would make it more competitive but I still think Bush wins it.


Seeing how Dean has had so much success with the Internet, wouldn't it be cool if he had a poll asking voters who should be his running mate?

I doubt many Dean supporters would like Clark - he's tried time and time again to stop Dean (with no success, I might add).  Edwards would be Clark with no "stop Dean" credentials.  But judging by Edwards failure to even beat Kucinich in some polls, I doubt he'd be a possibility.

Dick Morris thinks Hillary might be the VP pick of Dean, but who knows?  The Clinton's have tried their own "Stop Dean" scenarios (enter Clark), so they might be out too.

Harold Ford, Jr. would be a good pick.  Or John Lewis from my state of Georgia.  Lewis wouldn't win GA for Dean, but it could help some - along with other southern states.
Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34271
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2003, 12:54:21 pm »
Ignore

I would like Russ Feingold better than anyone on this list.  The reason being, he tilts the midwest more to our side.  Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisonsin, Michigan, and Ohio will decide this election.

Out of the choices cited, I would choose John Edwards.  He helps us in the south, at least making more competitive if nothing else, and Edwards (only 50 on election day) could be groomed for a 2012 run at the presidency.  Gephardt would be in his early seventies and Clark in his sixties.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2003, 12:56:20 pm »
Ignore

See why GOP likes this election cycle, the battleground states will mostly in in gore states.

feingold is up for reelection and edwards has said no.


I would like Russ Feingold better than anyone on this list.  The reason being, he tilts the midwest more to our side.  Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisonsin, Michigan, and Ohio will decide this election.

Out of the choices cited, I would choose John Edwards.  He helps us in the south, at least making more competitive if nothing else, and Edwards (only 50 on election day) could be groomed for a 2012 run at the presidency.  Gephardt would be in his early seventies and Clark in his sixties.
Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34271
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2003, 12:59:54 pm »
Ignore

See why GOP likes this election cycle, the battleground states will mostly in in gore states.

feingold is up for reelection and edwards has said no.


I would like Russ Feingold better than anyone on this list.  The reason being, he tilts the midwest more to our side.  Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisonsin, Michigan, and Ohio will decide this election.

Out of the choices cited, I would choose John Edwards.  He helps us in the south, at least making more competitive if nothing else, and Edwards (only 50 on election day) could be groomed for a 2012 run at the presidency.  Gephardt would be in his early seventies and Clark in his sixties.
I still thin Edwards would accept the vP nod if it was offered to him.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4348
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2003, 01:12:43 pm »
Ignore

Clark would add foreign policy, but recent tiff with Dean won't help, plus Clark hasn't said anything about DOMESTIC issues.

Like I said before, I can see Clark as Secretary of State (or Defense) in a Dean administration. He definitely has the credentials for it. But VP is unrealistic, true.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34271
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2003, 01:25:22 pm »
Ignore

Clark would be a good cabinet member.  I would also like Edwards as attorney General, maybe.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53003
Norway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2003, 01:31:18 pm »
Ignore

Agreed(what about Gephardt as sec. of Labor?)
Logged

'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34271
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2003, 01:35:23 pm »
Ignore

Agreed(what about Gephardt as sec. of Labor?)
I don't think he would accept.  Kucinich could be secretary of Agriculture.  That way he could tell us how many barrels of corn we produced every year...
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
MAS117
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5297
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2003, 07:10:35 pm »
Ignore

Although I think Sen. John Edwards is a good man, and would be a great VP, i doubt he will accept. ON FOX NEWS SUNDAY, he was asked directly about it and he said:

WALLACE: Senator, you have made a point in this campaign of not criticizing your opponents. In fact, you resisted a couple of my efforts today. Some people say that that's a pretty good way to run for vice president.

Do you have any interest in being the vice presidental nominee? And specifically, would you accept it if offered?

EDWARDS: I'm absolutely not interested in being vice president. No, the answer to that question is no.


It's out there clearly he doesn't want it. I hope and think he might if given the oppournity. I don't know why Rep. Harold Ford Jr. is on the list. Ford is a supporter and he endorsed Sen. Kerry for the nomination. Hilliary will be on the list, and I believe so will retiring Sen. Graham. Gen. Clark maybe too. For the rest I doubt it.
Logged
MAS117
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5297
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2003, 07:12:16 pm »
Ignore

For all those listing listing candidates like Dick Gephardt, and Kuchinich as cabinet members, I wouldn't get your hopes up. They are negatively attacking Dean who will win the nomination. Clark is the best shot. the next colin powell
Logged
DarthKosh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 902


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2003, 07:24:49 pm »
Ignore

For all those listing listing candidates like Dick Gephardt, and Kuchinich as cabinet members, I wouldn't get your hopes up. They are negatively attacking Dean who will win the nomination. Clark is the best shot. the next colin powell

Clark is not as smart as Powell.
Logged
zorkpolitics
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1028
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2003, 07:32:31 pm »
Ignore

The selection of a running mate may give everyone a clear idea of Dean's compaign strategy:
Clark, Edwards, or Ford, would indicate he is going for Southern border states (MO, AR, TN, LA, KY, WV, FL)
Feingold or Gephardt, or another midwesterner: OH, MO, and solidify IA, WI, MN)
Richardson a Southwest strategy: (NV, AZ, CO, solidify NM)
I don't think Kerry or Lieberman would make anything more competititve for Dean

Logged

"Scientists are treacherous allies on committees, for they are apt to change their minds in response to arguments" C.M. Bowra

The only way to reverse the failed polices of the past is OMG: Obama Must Go!
CHRISTOPHER MICHAE
Guest
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2003, 10:25:04 pm »

For all those listing listing candidates like Dick Gephardt, and Kuchinich as cabinet members, I wouldn't get your hopes up. They are negatively attacking Dean who will win the nomination. Clark is the best shot. the next colin powell

Clark is not as smart as Powell.
Yes, you're right. He's smarter! Although I really admire Colin Powell. His wife won't let him run for anything.
Logged
jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 31, 2003, 12:46:11 am »
Ignore

I wouldn't get your hopes up either as Dean will go down in flames no matter his running mate and thus no cabinet positions.


For all those listing listing candidates like Dick Gephardt, and Kuchinich as cabinet members, I wouldn't get your hopes up. They are negatively attacking Dean who will win the nomination. Clark is the best shot. the next colin powell
Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
jravnsbo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 31, 2003, 12:48:49 am »
Ignore

Yes it will tell us some and I think narrow the map also.  Take away Graham and I think GOP EASILY wins Florida.  Take away Clark and MO and AR become a lot safer.  

I just don't see Gephardt and Dean joining together after there many battles and Gephardt being such an establishment candidate and Dean is running against the establishment in Washington and the Democrat primary.


The selection of a running mate may give everyone a clear idea of Dean's compaign strategy:
Clark, Edwards, or Ford, would indicate he is going for Southern border states (MO, AR, TN, LA, KY, WV, FL)
Feingold or Gephardt, or another midwesterner: OH, MO, and solidify IA, WI, MN)
Richardson a Southwest strategy: (NV, AZ, CO, solidify NM)
I don't think Kerry or Lieberman would make anything more competititve for Dean


Logged

Currently in Iraq, risking my butt to protect yours!

Republicans think every day is July 4, Democarts think every day is April 15
President Reagan

Well I can hear you and soon the whole world will hear all of us. President George Bush
swampdude
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 31, 2003, 02:02:28 am »
Ignore

My gut tells me that Dean will select Wesley Clark as VP candidate, but there will be some fences to mend between them.   John Edwards would give him some credibility in the South, but I don't really think it would help much in the long run.  As a Republican, I can only dream of a Dean/Gephardt ticket!   I can't help but believe that Karl Rove would salivate at that prospect.  Hillary would never allow herself to be connected to a Dean candidacy.  She is planning to be the Democrat party's salvation in 2008.   She may be slicker than Slick Willie!!
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53003
Norway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: December 31, 2003, 05:13:25 am »
Ignore

For all those listing listing candidates like Dick Gephardt, and Kuchinich as cabinet members, I wouldn't get your hopes up. They are negatively attacking Dean who will win the nomination. Clark is the best shot. the next colin powell

Clark is not as smart as Powell.

Grow up...
Logged

'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory