Opinion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:25:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Freedom act (R)		  
#2
Horrible act (R)		  
#3
Freedom act (D)		  
#4
Horrible act (D)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 70

Author Topic: Opinion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965  (Read 1499 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: May 13, 2017, 02:57:41 PM »
Great! The CRA of 1964 should have had a time limit put in it for forty or fifty years, though.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2017, 03:42:54 PM »
Quote from: Virginia on May 13, 2017, 03:16:05 PM
Quote from: Kingpoleon on May 13, 2017, 02:57:41 PM
Great! The CRA of 1964 should have had a time limit put in it for forty or fifty years, though.

Why?

I would have supported anti-discrimination measures at the time, but now the means thereof are not needed and immoral in my opinion. I have been criticized for this before, but I don't support anti-discrimination measures at all today.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2017, 04:41:27 PM »
Quote from: Technocratic Timmy on May 13, 2017, 04:23:37 PM
So far every Democrat has voted Freedom act while the Republicans are split 50/50.
I assume some are confusing it with the CRA of 1964.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2017, 07:51:21 PM »
Quote from: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on May 14, 2017, 06:50:56 PM
Quote from: Kingpoleon on May 13, 2017, 03:42:54 PM
Quote from: Virginia on May 13, 2017, 03:16:05 PM
Quote from: Kingpoleon on May 13, 2017, 02:57:41 PM
Great! The CRA of 1964 should have had a time limit put in it for forty or fifty years, though.

Why?

I would have supported anti-discrimination measures at the time, but now the means thereof are not needed and immoral in my opinion. I have been criticized for this before, but I don't support anti-discrimination measures at all today.

you seriously claiming that racism is over?

No, just that the social need for the CRA of 1964 is no longer a moral imperative but rather an immoral bad thing as it is outweighed by the economic need for free markets.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.