AZ-02: Dem internal shows McSally in trouble

[Figueira]

Fearless Leader X, 2016 was not a republican wave, as Republicans lost the Senate races in NH, NV, CO, lost NV, VA, CO, NH at the presidential level, lost NC-GOV, and lost a net six house seats.

Wow, I agree with Wulfric. 2016 was definitely not a Republican wave, especially not in Arizona.

I agree though that Kirkpatrick should run for statewide office. Just not McSally's seat. Unless literally no one else is running.

[Terry the Fat Shark]

It was a joke lol

[Heisenberg]

Fearless Leader X, 2016 was not a republican wave, as Republicans lost the Senate races in NH, NV, CO, lost NV, VA, CO, NH at the presidential level, lost NC-GOV, and lost a net six house seats.

It's fair to call it a Republican wave in some places. Also, there's always going to be some "anti-bellwethers" in some places. VA is too pro-deep state, pro-swamp, and pro-big government for Trump to have won it, and Nevada and New Hampshire were too pro-choice for Trump to win.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Fearless Leader X, 2016 was not a republican wave, as Republicans lost the Senate races in NH, NV, CO, lost NV, VA, CO, NH at the presidential level, lost NC-GOV, and lost a net six house seats.

Wow, I agree with Wulfric. 2016 was definitely not a Republican wave, especially not in Arizona.

I agree though that Kirkpatrick should run for statewide office. Just not McSally's seat. Unless literally no one else is running.

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Fearless Leader X, 2016 was not a republican wave, as Republicans lost the Senate races in NH, NV, CO, lost NV, VA, CO, NH at the presidential level, lost NC-GOV, and lost a net six house seats.

Wow, I agree with Wulfric. 2016 was definitely not a Republican wave, especially not in Arizona.

I agree though that Kirkpatrick should run for statewide office. Just not McSally's seat. Unless literally no one else is running.

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

Not in Arizona.

[The Other Castro]

Fearless Leader X, 2016 was not a republican wave, as Republicans lost the Senate races in NH, NV, CO, lost NV, VA, CO, NH at the presidential level, lost NC-GOV, and lost a net six house seats.

Wow, I agree with Wulfric. 2016 was definitely not a Republican wave, especially not in Arizona.

I agree though that Kirkpatrick should run for statewide office. Just not McSally's seat. Unless literally no one else is running.

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

Republicans won the House vote by 1.1%, and lost the Presidential vote by 2.1%. That's a wash, not a wave (they also lost the Senate vote by a lot but that's not a representative sample).

[Holmes]

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

[Gass3268]

Fearless Leader X, 2016 was not a republican wave, as Republicans lost the Senate races in NH, NV, CO, lost NV, VA, CO, NH at the presidential level, lost NC-GOV, and lost a net six house seats.

Wow, I agree with Wulfric. 2016 was definitely not a Republican wave, especially not in Arizona.

I agree though that Kirkpatrick should run for statewide office. Just not McSally's seat. Unless literally no one else is running.

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

Republicans won the House vote by 1.1%, and lost the Presidential vote by 2.1%. That's a wash, not a wave (they also lost the Senate vote by a lot but that's not a representative sample).

Depends on how you count the Senate votes out of California.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

Losing seats never qualifies as a wave. Period.

[Figueira]

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

Losing seats never qualifies as a wave. Period.

In the House, I agree (with the possible exception of years ending in 2). In the Senate, this isn't necessarily true, especially with current polarization.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

Losing seats never qualifies as a wave. Period.

You're wrong.  Period.

[Ebsy]

lol what sort of moron could possibly think 2016 was a wave?

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

lol what sort of moron could possibly think 2016 was a wave?

This one:

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

It's really in the same camp as the whole "Trump is the only R who was capable of beating Hillary" crap - lies people tell themselves to feel better about what happened in 2016.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

lol what sort of moron could possibly think 2016 was a wave?

This one:

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

It's really in the same camp as the whole "Trump is the only R who was capable of beating Hillary" crap - lies people tell themselves to feel better about what happened in 2016.

You mean like the one where you pretend people care who you "endorse?"  Also I'm pretty sure no one thinks Trump was the only Republican who could beat Hillary in 2016, but whatever.

[Brittain33]

2016 was a good Republican year. Not a wave.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

lol what sort of moron could possibly think 2016 was a wave?

This one:

2016 was absolutely a Republican wave.

It's really in the same camp as the whole "Trump is the only R who was capable of beating Hillary" crap - lies people tell themselves to feel better about what happened in 2016.

You mean like the one where you pretend people care who you "endorse?"  Also I'm pretty sure no one thinks Trump was the only Republican who could beat Hillary in 2016, but whatever.

A bunch of people on Atlas have said it.

[The Arizonan]

Having a net loss of seats is definitely not a wave.

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

Losing seats never qualifies as a wave. Period.

You're wrong.  Period.

This entire thread is on its period. Period.

[GeorgiaModerate]

Having a net loss of seats is definitely not a wave.

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

Losing seats never qualifies as a wave. Period.

You're wrong.  Period.

This entire thread is on its period. Period.

Periods are so extreme.  How about some semicolons?

[The Arizonan]

Having a net loss of seats is definitely not a wave.

Democrats actually did gain seats in the House and Senate in 2016, so it was in no way a wave...

Republicans were already almost maxed out, especially in the house.

Losing seats never qualifies as a wave. Period.

You're wrong.  Period.

This entire thread is on its period. Period.

Periods are so extreme.  How about some semicolons?

No, they are Independents.