Trump revealed classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador

[ApatheticAustrian]

i can also post it a third time if necessary.

the agencies did "censor" the article, cause it was correct and included classified informations.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

Sources from the intelligence community are beginning to confirm that the Washington Post was accurate in their reporting.

"Sources."

Sources say water is wet

"Sources"

This is coming from @NoahGrayCNN on twitter

[DrScholl]

Top headlines on foxnews.com right now:

"Hillary Clinton launches Onward Together PAC"
"Could a probe of Hillary's email server be reopened?"
"Hillary Clinton launches PAC aimed at resisting Trump"
"Krauthammer on DNC slamming Trump intel reveal: Hillary did much worse"

Most of the extreme far-left types are also more concerned with Hillary's PAC and think it's much worse than anything Trump has done.

[ApatheticAustrian]

Bombshell: Initial Thoughts on the Washington Post’s Game-Changing Story
https://www.lawfareblog.com/bombshell-initial-thoughts-washington-posts-game-changing-story

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[GeorgiaModerate]

Tomorrow's NY Daily News front page: https://twitter.com/NYDailyNews

[The_Doctor]

Don't forget the Flynn indictment is still yet to come, plus the Manafort and Page cases.

[ProudModerate2]

Wow, what do you know? I want both of those things.

See... the problem is your party is preventing an independent prosecutor and just further enabling Trump by excusing everything he does

But this doesn't just go with Republicans. Democrats did this in regards to Fast and Furious and the IRS targeting scandal.  

Admittedly, I never really looked into those so I can't comment on that but let's face it...if Trump get's away with the GOP defending him on this leak then he's just going to get more brazen and corrupt.

When BIll Clinton was president, he voluntarily agreed to have Ken Starr investigate him...we will never get that out of Trump or the current GOP

Many Republicans have already condemned him.

And Obama never had independent investigations into stuff going on in his admin, so who's to say post-Clinton Democrats will appoint special prosecutors?

You are right.
We needed a independent investigator assigned to look into the fact that Obama was born in Kenya, that his birth certificate was fake, and that he was really a Muslim.
This kind of "stuff going on in his administration" was very important, and needed to be investigated ASAP.

[TheSaint250]

Wow, what do you know? I want both of those things.

See... the problem is your party is preventing an independent prosecutor and just further enabling Trump by excusing everything he does

But this doesn't just go with Republicans. Democrats did this in regards to Fast and Furious and the IRS targeting scandal.  

Admittedly, I never really looked into those so I can't comment on that but let's face it...if Trump get's away with the GOP defending him on this leak then he's just going to get more brazen and corrupt.

When BIll Clinton was president, he voluntarily agreed to have Ken Starr investigate him...we will never get that out of Trump or the current GOP

Many Republicans have already condemned him.

And Obama never had independent investigations into stuff going on in his admin, so who's to say post-Clinton Democrats will appoint special prosecutors?

You are right.
We needed a independent investigator assigned to look into the fact that Obama was born in Kenya, that his birth certificate was fake, and that he was really a Muslim.
This kind of "stuff going on in his administration" was very important, and needed to be investigated ASAP.

hahahahahahahaha

not funny

i was referring to fast and furious, IRS, etc.

[yankeesfan]

All 3 of the people in the room with trump have denied he shared confidential info: tillerson, powell, and mcmaster.

Why should they NOT be trusted, but anti-trump leakers are automatically trusted?

What PROOF do we have?

1. There was more than 3 people in the room with Trump,
2.  They have NOT denied that he shared confidential info.

It's very frustrating dealing with apologists that ignore the facts.

1. Name them. All of them.
2. They have denied what the Compost claimed.

For the last time, the statements did not deny what the Washington Post reported.  They denied that sources, methods and military operations were discussed.  That's not what WaPo reported.

As for the other point, you can't seriously be claiming that those three were the only ones in the room, can you?

That's exactly what the Compost was saying.

Wrong.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/15/white-house-denies-report-trump-revealed-classified-info-about-isis-to-russians.html

Your article says the deniers are saying that they "did not discuss sources, methods or military operations."

The Washington Post said that Trump revealed code word "intelligence".

Both of these can be true.  They are not mutually exclusive.  The WH denial is a non-denial because it doesn't deny Trump revealing classified intel.

I've tried walking you blue avvys through this as basically as I can.

[Gass3268]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Hahaha! So many of Trump's closest advisors love to leak to the press!

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

Tomorrow's NY Daily News front page: https://twitter.com/NYDailyNews

Ouch...

[The_Doctor]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Hahaha! So many of Trump's closest advisors love to leak to the press!

Is he being satirical? I think he is.

[ApatheticAustrian]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Hahaha! So many of Trump's closest advisors love to leak to the press!

Is he being satirical? I think he is.

AP is just what his name says...a pundit and this is his trademark cynicism.

[ProudModerate2]

Why is it that every single new thing that comes up about Trump and/or his administration is immediately dismissed by his supporters?  Is it just them trying to save face, or are they legitimately deranged?

If Hillary had won, and then all of these revelations started coming out of possible Russian collusion and her giving classified info (reportedly more info than even our allies have on the matter), then she would lose my support.  At some point, something has got to give with these people.

Answer: They are legitimately deranged. Especially marty.
Also, nothing "will give with these people." If trump walked up to marty's mother and shot her in her head, marty would find an excuse for why it was acceptable, and he would still support the orange-haired slug.

[TheSaint250]

Why is it that every single new thing that comes up about Trump and/or his administration is immediately dismissed by his supporters?  Is it just them trying to save face, or are they legitimately deranged?

If Hillary had won, and then all of these revelations started coming out of possible Russian collusion and her giving classified info (reportedly more info than even our allies have on the matter), then she would lose my support.  At some point, something has got to give with these people.

Answer: They are legitimately deranged. Especially marty.
Also, nothing "will give with these people." If trump walked up to marty's mother and shot her in her head, marty would find an excuse for why it was acceptable, and he would still support the orange-haired slug.

that is a disgusting thing to say

[Horus]

Why is it that every single new thing that comes up about Trump and/or his administration is immediately dismissed by his supporters?  Is it just them trying to save face, or are they legitimately deranged?

If Hillary had won, and then all of these revelations started coming out of possible Russian collusion and her giving classified info (reportedly more info than even our allies have on the matter), then she would lose my support.  At some point, something has got to give with these people.

Answer: They are legitimately deranged. Especially marty.
Also, nothing "will give with these people." If trump walked up to marty's mother and shot her in her head, marty would find an excuse for why it was acceptable, and he would still support the orange-haired slug.

that is a disgusting thing to say

Despite that, it is almost certainly true.

[MasterJedi]

Why is it that every single new thing that comes up about Trump and/or his administration is immediately dismissed by his supporters?  Is it just them trying to save face, or are they legitimately deranged?

If Hillary had won, and then all of these revelations started coming out of possible Russian collusion and her giving classified info (reportedly more info than even our allies have on the matter), then she would lose my support.  At some point, something has got to give with these people.

Answer: They are legitimately deranged. Especially marty.
Also, nothing "will give with these people." If trump walked up to marty's mother and shot her in her head, marty would find an excuse for why it was acceptable, and he would still support the orange-haired slug.

that is a disgusting thing to say

And true, march of the sycophants.

[This account no longer in use.]

I had to leave for a while after page 11; anything happen since then?

[TheSaint250]

I had to leave for a while after page 11; anything happen since then?

just disgusting personal attacks

[Mike Thick]

I had to leave for a while after page 11; anything happen since then?

[Beet]

I had to leave for a while after page 11; anything happen since then?

just disgusting personal attacks

[yankeesfan]

I don't consider the attacks personal as the Trump apologists are just emissaries of a unified brainless cult.

[ProudModerate2]

Top headlines on foxnews.com right now:

"Hillary Clinton launches Onward Together PAC"
"Could a probe of Hillary's email server be reopened?"
"Hillary Clinton launches PAC aimed at resisting Trump"
"Krauthammer on DNC slamming Trump intel reveal: Hillary did much worse"

The story is everywhere now. MSNBC, CNN, and even FOX.

It's news. Of course they're going to cover it.  That's why it's called Fox NEWS.

But I don't understand these Fox News headlines ......
TheSaint250 said that Fox always places "true news" on their front page (see his comment referenced above, that I brought forward here, from his earlier post).
LOL.

[TheSaint250]

Top headlines on foxnews.com right now:

"Hillary Clinton launches Onward Together PAC"
"Could a probe of Hillary's email server be reopened?"
"Hillary Clinton launches PAC aimed at resisting Trump"
"Krauthammer on DNC slamming Trump intel reveal: Hillary did much worse"

The story is everywhere now. MSNBC, CNN, and even FOX.

It's news. Of course they're going to cover it.  That's why it's called Fox NEWS.

But I don't understand these Fox News headlines ......
TheSaint250 said that Fox always places "true news" on their front page (see his comment referenced above, that I brought forward here, from his earlier post).
LOL.

It's not covered as it should be, but it's being covered

[TheSaint250]

I don't consider the attacks personal as the Trump apologists are just emissaries of a unified brainless cult.

1. You used a personal attack to justify how this wasn't a personal attack
2. Read what people were saying about Marty