Trump approval ratings thread 1.1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:18:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Trump approval ratings thread 1.1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump approval ratings thread 1.1  (Read 202219 times)
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: July 27, 2017, 10:01:02 AM »

When I went there I saw so many Asians. Everyone always talks about Hispanics, or me it was Asians everywhere. That got me thinking, were they foreigners on vacation to Santa Monica, or were they California residents?
You can spot a foreign tourist by looking at them.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2017, 11:41:49 AM »

PPIC - California:

Approve 25%
Disapprove 71%

Only 68% of California Republicans and 33% of Independents approve of Trump.

Source

california is real america, best america confirmed

I agree. Smiley

When I went there I saw so many Asians. Everyone always talks about Hispanics, or me it was Asians everywhere. That got me thinking, were they foreigners on vacation to Santa Monica, or were they California residents?

Does this go into the Deplorapile?

Naso's entire posting history belongs in the deplorable or bad post threads
And yours belong in the irony thread.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2017, 12:08:47 PM »

TD,

Don't forget that when he refers to "the majority," he means the majority of White, heterosexual, Christians who don't live on the coasts or in big cities. According to him, that's America. Everything and everyone else is foreign and not to be taken into consideration.
That is America.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2017, 12:15:10 PM »

Why do people bully Naso?
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2017, 12:44:38 PM »

Or we could just take this nonsensical debate out of this thread and let ReaganFan live his miserable life the way he wants. If he wants to be openly racist, let him. He's certainly not going to get anywhere in life with those out in the open views
Yes, I never understood why people get so outraged when they perceive someone is being "racist". Who cares?
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2017, 12:30:09 PM »

These days, the big cities are generally the home of productive people who are paying for the rest of the country.

Makers and Takers right?

Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2017, 01:55:10 PM »

That's actually a great point. Ford almost winning in 1876 is what gave me pause, but then again, Ford was a lot more likeable and popular on a personal level than Pence ever is/was.

Yeah, that was wild how Rutherford B. Hayes won against Samuel J. Ford.

Lol FIFY. Though Hayes was a fluke too.
In the same way that Sergei Mavrodi was a fluke.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2017, 12:20:40 PM »

At this point, even I disapprove.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2017, 02:32:57 PM »


Ultimately, it is for the same reason I turned on Obama after Orlando - the sheer insensitivity of his response was enough to push me over the edge and accept the tides that had been turning in my head for a while now. I still believe he has been treated unfairly by the media, and I am willing to be supportive of him where I agree, but I don't feel any need to actively defend someone who obviously doesn't care about me, or anyone but himself, for that matter.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2017, 03:23:42 PM »


Ultimately, it is for the same reason I turned on Obama after Orlando - the sheer insensitivity of his response was enough to push me over the edge and accept the tides that had been turning in my head for a while now. I still believe he has been treated unfairly by the media, and I am willing to be supportive of him where I agree, but I don't feel any need to actively defend someone who obviously doesn't care about me, or anyone but himself, for that matter.

Could you elaborate on what it was about Obama's response to Orlando that you thought was insensitive? I honestly don't remember what his reaction was, but just looking up his statement, it wasn't anything dramatically different from what you'd expect under the circumstances - calling it an act of terror, deploying federal agencies to work with local ones - is it just that it was a level political response rather than an emotional appeal?


He managed to bring Sandy Hook and other shootings into a statement which was supposed to be a response to an Islamic terrorist attack, and focused his speech on gun control, not terrorism. He later said the debate over his refusal to say "radical Islam" was a distraction. It may not seem that bad in retrospect, but remember how hot the political temperature was at that time last year.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2017, 02:06:34 PM »


They might as well just go all the way and call it "ungood".
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #11 on: August 28, 2017, 12:46:55 PM »

There's also the issue of fraud in the census. The 2000 census deliberately undercounted Democratic-leaning demographics and places.

That damn Republican Bill Clinton...
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2017, 10:58:10 AM »
« Edited: September 13, 2017, 11:38:05 AM by Santander »

You can't simultaneously call a pollster "trash" and then say their poll is "worth noting" in the same sentence.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,937
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2017, 11:38:11 AM »

You can't simultaneously call a pollster "trash" and then say their poll is "worth nothing" in the same sentence.

Sure you can! They mean the same thing! Cheesy

...sorry, I know that was a typo but I could not resist.
Good catch. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.