Policies in a post-Trump era (the next 25 years)

[American2020]

Trump's presidency seems to be a disaster. We're thinking about the post-Trump era.
I vote for a combination between a Great Reconstruction, a new deal and a restoration of Obama's era.

[Sumner 1868]

Bland neoliberalism almost identical to Hillary Clinton's politics but with a less toxic figurehead.

[Santander]

- Life
- Marriage
- Israel

[Sumner 1868]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

[Santander]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

Economic nationalism doesn't mean fascism. The state can help lead nationalist fervor. Anyway, I replaced Bannon's trinity with Cruz's because it's more succinct, although of course I'd like all of the above.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Free cosmetic procedures would do wonders for the national morale.

[RFayette]

Hopefully Ted Cruz's 2016 agenda could be enacted in full.

[Kingpoleon]

I'd like to see some form of Wyden's various budget proposals. Ideally, we would have a Wyden-Díaz-Balart-Moulton budget.

[pbrower2a]

First, undo the damage. End the corrupt deals, and prosecute malefactors.

We will be in a position in which we will need to presume that practically everything that the Trump Administration has done is itself wrong.   

[Hindsight was 2020]

I think we are likely to see a realignment of each base with reps becoming rural an dems suburanties. The major result is likely the GOP becoming more anti-trade in a general "America first way" an Dems becoming Anti-Russia/foreign policy hawks

[SoLongAtlas]

Combination, some new deal like stuff but also admin rearrangement of the fed govt, Reps becoming either a purely rural party or moderating, Dems retaining more and more power on the federal level as time goes on, US retrenchment. A ton of policy new and reformed is made due to huge advancements in automation, bankruptcy and closing of hundreds if not thousands of companies, layoffs, consolidation, transportation rethinking on a grand scale, cyber issues take the forefront in just about everything http://www.futuretimeline.net/blog/business-politics-blog.htm#.WSWRpGjyuUk Both parties tend to favor new versions of protectionism and retention of current jobs, GOP more open to continuation of automation while they double-speak out against it.

A lot of things in this will occur http://www.futuretimeline.net/blog/business-politics-blog.htm#.WSWRpGjyuUk

[Middle-aged Europe]

Hopefully Ted Cruz's 2016 agenda could be enacted in full.

Oh god.

[Nyvin]

Once the baby boomer generation is gone things will get much better.   The conservative movement is only alive through them.

[SoLongAtlas]

Once the baby boomer generation is gone things will get much better.   The conservative movement is only alive through them.

So at least until the 2030s for the oldest boomers and into the 2040s for the youngest (born 1960). Some will live into their late 80s, 90s, some 100s but it will be few in number. That gives the 2030s folks the best shot at moderation. Millennials will be in the forties to thirties for young millennials at that time so starting to get involved in politics more/elected office.

[TheSaint250]

Center-right politics.

[Stranger in a strange land]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

Economic nationalism doesn't mean fascism. The state can help lead nationalist fervor. Anyway, I replaced Bannon's trinity with Cruz's because it's more succinct, although of course I'd like all of the above.

You can either have "Life, Marriage, Israel" or you can have "America First". You can't have both.

[Santander]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

Economic nationalism doesn't mean fascism. The state can help lead nationalist fervor. Anyway, I replaced Bannon's trinity with Cruz's because it's more succinct, although of course I'd like all of the above.

You can either have "Life, Marriage, Israel" or you can have "America First". You can't have both.

I never said America First. Israel always comes first.

[SoLongAtlas]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

Economic nationalism doesn't mean fascism. The state can help lead nationalist fervor. Anyway, I replaced Bannon's trinity with Cruz's because it's more succinct, although of course I'd like all of the above.

You can either have "Life, Marriage, Israel" or you can have "America First". You can't have both.

I never said America First. Israel always comes first.

Why? If it comes first why stay?

[Inmate Trump]

The next few presidents will be doing a course correct. Trump will have almost no lasting policies.

[Santander]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

Economic nationalism doesn't mean fascism. The state can help lead nationalist fervor. Anyway, I replaced Bannon's trinity with Cruz's because it's more succinct, although of course I'd like all of the above.

You can either have "Life, Marriage, Israel" or you can have "America First". You can't have both.

I never said America First. Israel always comes first.

Why? If it comes first why stay?

Okay, I realize that my comment could be interpreted as trolling or perhaps even anti-Zionist, so I will clarify.

If we stay true to America's founding values and traditions, Israel must always remain a priority and the interests of America and the Jewish nation of Israel will always be aligned, even if at times our governments may disagree, as they are entitled to.

[pbrower2a]

Once the baby boomer generation is gone things will get much better.   The conservative movement is only alive through them.

Elderly voters are turning against Trump. I'm guessing that such is on foreign policy and national security. 

[senyor_brownbear]

- National security and sovereignty
- Economic nationalism
- Deconstruction of the administrative state

These two principles are contradictory and can't co-exist with the other.

Economic nationalism doesn't mean fascism. The state can help lead nationalist fervor. Anyway, I replaced Bannon's trinity with Cruz's because it's more succinct, although of course I'd like all of the above.

You can either have "Life, Marriage, Israel" or you can have "America First". You can't have both.

I never said America First. Israel always comes first.

Why? If it comes first why stay?

Okay, I realize that my comment could be interpreted as trolling or perhaps even anti-Zionist, so I will clarify.

If we stay true to America's founding values and traditions, Israel must always remain a priority and the interests of America and the Jewish nation of Israel will always be aligned, even if at times our governments may disagree, as they are entitled to.

Are you willing to extend that kind of commitment to any other country, like Canada or UK?