Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:07:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning?  (Read 3225 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,755
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


« on: June 04, 2017, 05:59:05 PM »

Again, it was the Senate candidates in PA: McGinty, OH Strickland, and IN Bayh, that help sank Clinton.  If Sestak would have won the primary against McGinty things would have been alot different.  And Tim Ryan in Ohio

McGinty, Strickland, Bayh and Clinton were thought to be invincible because of the Black vote.  But, the Bernie Sanders vote didn't support the Senate candidates and supporting 3rd party candidates instead.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.