AHC: Upper Peninsula has city with population over 1M in 2017
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:38:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  AHC: Upper Peninsula has city with population over 1M in 2017
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AHC: Upper Peninsula has city with population over 1M in 2017  (Read 1604 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 30, 2017, 05:48:25 PM »

.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2017, 07:12:40 PM »

"City" here means urban area?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2017, 09:19:36 PM »

It means a municipality, like NYC, LA, Houston, et cetera
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2017, 10:30:33 PM »

Cities don't just spring up for no reason. About the only way to get even a 100K sized city there would be to have Canada be part of the U.S. and as a result have  Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan be the bigger of the two Soos.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2017, 01:30:53 AM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2017, 01:29:36 PM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?

Why would there be?  As I said, cities don't come into existence for no reason.   Until the Mackinac Bridge opened in 1957 there was no road link between the upper and lower peninsulas. There never was a rail link. Between the two Soos, while a rail bridge was built in 1880, there wasn't a road link until 1962.  The transportation difficulties alone make the development of a big city in the UP extremely unlikely.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2017, 02:00:51 PM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?

Why would there be?  As I said, cities don't come into existence for no reason.   Until the Mackinac Bridge opened in 1957 there was no road link between the upper and lower peninsulas. There never was a rail link. Between the two Soos, while a rail bridge was built in 1880, there wasn't a road link until 1962.  The transportation difficulties alone make the development of a big city in the UP extremely unlikely.
The UP is just centrally located in the Great Lakes region though. In some alternate universe, that fact could help power a city to a 150k-200k population.
Transportation is the biggest problem though. A smaller US focused on the Great Lakes and building up infastructure there might help...
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2017, 11:54:48 AM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?

Why would there be?  As I said, cities don't come into existence for no reason.   Until the Mackinac Bridge opened in 1957 there was no road link between the upper and lower peninsulas. There never was a rail link. Between the two Soos, while a rail bridge was built in 1880, there wasn't a road link until 1962.  The transportation difficulties alone make the development of a big city in the UP extremely unlikely.
The UP is just centrally located in the Great Lakes region though. In some alternate universe, that fact could help power a city to a 150k-200k population.
Transportation is the biggest problem though. A smaller US focused on the Great Lakes and building up infastructure there might help...

It isn't just transportation -- the geography is swampy in the East and rugged in the West. The soil and climate are really not on your side either.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2017, 01:19:09 PM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?

Why would there be?  As I said, cities don't come into existence for no reason.   Until the Mackinac Bridge opened in 1957 there was no road link between the upper and lower peninsulas. There never was a rail link. Between the two Soos, while a rail bridge was built in 1880, there wasn't a road link until 1962.  The transportation difficulties alone make the development of a big city in the UP extremely unlikely.
The UP is just centrally located in the Great Lakes region though. In some alternate universe, that fact could help power a city to a 150k-200k population.
Transportation is the biggest problem though. A smaller US focused on the Great Lakes and building up infastructure there might help...
Detroit is far better placed as being centrally located on the lakes with Superior and Michigan-Huron above and Eire and Ontario below.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2017, 03:26:16 AM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?

Why would there be?  As I said, cities don't come into existence for no reason.   Until the Mackinac Bridge opened in 1957 there was no road link between the upper and lower peninsulas. There never was a rail link. Between the two Soos, while a rail bridge was built in 1880, there wasn't a road link until 1962.  The transportation difficulties alone make the development of a big city in the UP extremely unlikely.
The UP is just centrally located in the Great Lakes region though. In some alternate universe, that fact could help power a city to a 150k-200k population.
Transportation is the biggest problem though. A smaller US focused on the Great Lakes and building up infastructure there might help...
Detroit is far better placed as being centrally located on the lakes with Superior and Michigan-Huron above and Eire and Ontario below.
the best route would seem then to be increasing the importance of Lake Superior, and making ports like Duluth bigger then?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2017, 06:05:18 AM »

Why couldn't there be a mid-sized big city on the level of Toledo up there?

Why would there be?  As I said, cities don't come into existence for no reason.   Until the Mackinac Bridge opened in 1957 there was no road link between the upper and lower peninsulas. There never was a rail link. Between the two Soos, while a rail bridge was built in 1880, there wasn't a road link until 1962.  The transportation difficulties alone make the development of a big city in the UP extremely unlikely.
The UP is just centrally located in the Great Lakes region though. In some alternate universe, that fact could help power a city to a 150k-200k population.
Transportation is the biggest problem though. A smaller US focused on the Great Lakes and building up infastructure there might help...
Detroit is far better placed as being centrally located on the lakes with Superior and Michigan-Huron above and Eire and Ontario below.
the best route would seem then to be increasing the importance of Lake Superior, and making ports like Duluth bigger then?
Nah. That'd make Duluth bigger, but there's no reason it would help out a UP city. Maybe if the St. Mary's River had been more of an obstacle and Lake Michigan-Huron had been two lakes without easy passage between then a large city at the northern tip of Lake Michigan would've been a natural transportation hub, but that would've also increased the importance of Detroit and Toledo and shrunk Chicago considerably.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.