What's the longest time span a single party held power in a democratic nation?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:13:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  What's the longest time span a single party held power in a democratic nation?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: What's the longest time span a single party held power in a democratic nation?  (Read 1409 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 08, 2017, 03:21:15 AM »

Whether it be in europe, asia, america, africa, south america, which democratic country was controlled (as in they had majorities and the executive)  by one party for the longest stretch of time?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2017, 03:28:50 AM »

PRI had Mexico from 1929 to 2000. But it wasn't really that democratic for most of that time.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2017, 04:35:46 AM »

PRI had Mexico from 1929 to 2000. But it wasn't really that democratic for most of that time.

Yep. Vargas Llosa was dead right when he dubbed PRI-ran Mexico as a "perfect dictatorship".
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2017, 04:47:12 AM »

democratic party in japan?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2017, 05:02:26 AM »


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,038
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2017, 05:11:27 AM »

South Africa will probably be it at some point.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,314
Papua New Guinea


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2017, 06:37:23 AM »


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.

Uninterrupted 1936-1976, but in reality 1932-1976 as the centre-right government in 1936 only lasted four months.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2017, 06:57:49 AM »


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.

Uninterrupted 1936-1976, but in reality 1932-1976 as the centre-right government in 1936 only lasted four months.

I believe it was kind of power-sharing agreement, with Hansson letting the other guy, Axel Pehrsson-Bramstorp, enjoy the title for 101 days. Very nice of him.

Kind of like (keeping all the differences in mind) Hun Sen being in power in Cambodia ever since 1985, though he was officially "Second Prime Minister" from 1993 to 1998.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2017, 06:59:56 AM »

South African National Party held power from 1948 to 1995, but, despite having elections, it was at the very best semi-semi-semi-democratic system, with majority of population not being able to participate. Still, it were "free" elections as far as white community was concerned.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,267
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2017, 07:13:53 AM »

PAP had ruled Singapore since 1959.

The CSU has controlled Bavaria since democracy started if that counts
Logged
parochial boy
parochial_boy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,117


Political Matrix
E: -8.38, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2017, 07:35:29 AM »

Well, if we want to play with the rules a bit - the Radicals/PLR have been on the Swiss federal council since 1848.

They were a majority from 1848 - 1930.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,314
Papua New Guinea


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2017, 10:44:57 AM »

PAP had ruled Singapore since 1959.

The CSU has controlled Bavaria since democracy started if that counts

I am not sure being part of a four party coalition led by another party counts as "controlling", so I would say since 1957.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2017, 10:46:04 AM »


Oh right, we missed the most obvious one.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Not quite. SDP held the Premiership from 1954 to 1957 (and during the occupation from 1945 to 1946).
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,314
Papua New Guinea


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2017, 10:55:05 AM »


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.

Uninterrupted 1936-1976, but in reality 1932-1976 as the centre-right government in 1936 only lasted four months.

I believe it was kind of power-sharing agreement, with Hansson letting the other guy, Axel Pehrsson-Bramstorp, enjoy the title for 101 days. Very nice of him.

Not power sharing. The Social Democratic/Farmers' League coalition government lost a vote about the future defense structure and the Prime Minister resigned along with the Social Democratic ministers. The Farmers' League then continued in government together with various experts until the ordinary election in the autumn. Parliament wasn't convened during the summertime so there was hardly any government business going on.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2017, 11:29:58 AM »


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.

Uninterrupted 1936-1976, but in reality 1932-1976 as the centre-right government in 1936 only lasted four months.

I believe it was kind of power-sharing agreement, with Hansson letting the other guy, Axel Pehrsson-Bramstorp, enjoy the title for 101 days. Very nice of him.

Not power sharing. The Social Democratic/Farmers' League coalition government lost a vote about the future defense structure and the Prime Minister resigned along with the Social Democratic ministers. The Farmers' League then continued in government together with various experts until the ordinary election in the autumn. Parliament wasn't convened during the summertime so there was hardly any government business going on.

Oh, I misread what the "coalition" meant in that particular case. Thanks.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,320


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 08, 2017, 01:27:15 PM »
« Edited: June 08, 2017, 01:39:13 PM by Tintrlvr »

PAP had ruled Singapore since 1959.

The CSU has controlled Bavaria since democracy started if that counts

Singapore isn't really a democracy, at least no more than Mexico under the PRI, with political opposition largely banned and many opposition leaders jailed in the 1960s and 70s, and even today strong institutional favoritism for PAP eroding its credibility as a democracy. In any case, Singapore has only been an independent country since 1965.

Surely the LDP in Japan holds this title. 1955-1993, plus also its predecessor parties going back to 1948. That's 38 or 45 years continuously in power, depending on how you count it.


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.

The parties in power 1948-1955 were direct predecessors of the LDP (that eventually merged with other parties to form the LDP in 1955), so I think we can count that period also.
Logged
IceAgeComing
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,564
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2017, 01:37:38 PM »

if you include provincial level elections then the Alberta PCs control of Alberta from 1971 to 2015 has to be up there
Logged
parochial boy
parochial_boy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,117


Political Matrix
E: -8.38, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 08, 2017, 01:38:47 PM »

So nobody going to tell me why the Radicals/Free Democrats controlling the Swiss Federal Council for 82 years doesn't count?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 08, 2017, 01:43:29 PM »

PAP had ruled Singapore since 1959.

The CSU has controlled Bavaria since democracy started if that counts

Singapore isn't really a democracy, at least no more than Mexico under the PRI, with political opposition largely banned and many opposition leaders jailed in the 1960s and 70s, and even today strong institutional favoritism for PAP eroding its credibility as a democracy. In any case, Singapore has only been an independent country since 1965.

Surely the LDP in Japan holds this title. 1955-1993, plus also its predecessor parties going back to 1948. That's 38 or 45 years continuously in power, depending on how you count it.


Uninterrupted time in power: 1955-1992.

If we're talking uninterrupted time, I think Swedish Social Democrats might be a strong contender.

The parties in power 1948-1955 were direct predecessors of the LDP (that eventually merged with other parties to form the LDP in 1955), so I think we can count that period also.

Well, Mexican PRI, our favorite example it seems, only adopted the name in 1946, with its predecessor ruling since Plutarco Elías Calles Presidency.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,320


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 08, 2017, 01:44:19 PM »

So nobody going to tell me why the Radicals/Free Democrats controlling the Swiss Federal Council for 82 years doesn't count?

They didn't have a majority in the National Council as far as I can tell, only control of the Federal Council. The OP specified legislative as well as executive control.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 12, 2017, 03:50:04 PM »

Why exactly are we calling Singapore democratic?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 12, 2017, 03:53:18 PM »

Why exactly are we calling Singapore democratic?

Reported for insulting the glorious legacy of Lee Kuan Yew
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 12, 2017, 04:06:35 PM »

if you include provincial level elections then the Alberta PCs control of Alberta from 1971 to 2015 has to be up there

Vermont had Republican governors from 1854-1963. That's about 55 straight elections won there.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,163
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 12, 2017, 05:12:40 PM »

I'm not sure if Italy's DC counts, since they were almost always in coalition with one party or the other, but still, leading every government from 1946 to 1981 is something.
Logged
Lachi
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,351
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 12, 2017, 08:06:34 PM »

The Labor party held onto Tasmania's state parliament for 35 years (1934-1969)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 11 queries.